Participation Restrictions in Early Learning and Child Care Among Children With Long-Term Conditions or Disabilities.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Allison Leanage, David Wavrock, Rubab Arim
{"title":"Participation Restrictions in Early Learning and Child Care Among Children With Long-Term Conditions or Disabilities.","authors":"Allison Leanage, David Wavrock, Rubab Arim","doi":"10.1111/cch.70291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with long-term conditions (LTC) or disabilities often face participation restrictions in early learning and child care (ELCC), but little is known about their specific challenges. This study used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify non-categorical profiles of children's disability-related difficulties, capturing the heterogeneity of conditions rather than condition-specific categories, and examined socio-demographic and child care participation characteristics informing common challenges and needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data drawn from the 2023 Survey on ELCC Arrangements-Children with LTC and Disabilities included 1977 children aged 0-5 (98% of survey sample). LCA identified groups based on parent-reported difficulties, activity limitations, LTC and disabilities. Child care participation, difficulty finding child care, extra support needs and school participation were compared across the total sample and identified classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A four-class model provided the most meaningful solution. Class 1 (Relatively Healthy, 48%) included children likely to have difficulty learning, remembering, or concentrating sometimes. Class 2 (Activity Limitations and LTC, 14%) included children likely to have activity limitations (90%) and LTC (80%). Class 3 (LTC, 28%) included children most likely to have LTC (95%) but no activity limitations. Class 4 (Children with Disabilities, 10%) included children most likely to have multiple difficulties and disabilities, activity limitations and LTC. Relatively healthy children were most often reported in excellent or very good health (88%), were least likely to require extra support (42%) or have difficulty finding child care (37%) and were less often enrolled in school (34%), whereas children with disabilities were least likely to be in excellent or very good health (50%), most likely to require extra support (94%) and often enrolled in school (50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Children with LTC or disabilities are a diverse group with varying extra support needs and patterns of participation in ELCC and school engagement. These differences highlight the importance of inclusive, responsive strategies to reduce access gaps and promote early educational engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":55262,"journal":{"name":"Child Care Health and Development","volume":"52 3","pages":"e70291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Care Health and Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.70291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with long-term conditions (LTC) or disabilities often face participation restrictions in early learning and child care (ELCC), but little is known about their specific challenges. This study used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify non-categorical profiles of children's disability-related difficulties, capturing the heterogeneity of conditions rather than condition-specific categories, and examined socio-demographic and child care participation characteristics informing common challenges and needs.

Methods: Data drawn from the 2023 Survey on ELCC Arrangements-Children with LTC and Disabilities included 1977 children aged 0-5 (98% of survey sample). LCA identified groups based on parent-reported difficulties, activity limitations, LTC and disabilities. Child care participation, difficulty finding child care, extra support needs and school participation were compared across the total sample and identified classes.

Results: A four-class model provided the most meaningful solution. Class 1 (Relatively Healthy, 48%) included children likely to have difficulty learning, remembering, or concentrating sometimes. Class 2 (Activity Limitations and LTC, 14%) included children likely to have activity limitations (90%) and LTC (80%). Class 3 (LTC, 28%) included children most likely to have LTC (95%) but no activity limitations. Class 4 (Children with Disabilities, 10%) included children most likely to have multiple difficulties and disabilities, activity limitations and LTC. Relatively healthy children were most often reported in excellent or very good health (88%), were least likely to require extra support (42%) or have difficulty finding child care (37%) and were less often enrolled in school (34%), whereas children with disabilities were least likely to be in excellent or very good health (50%), most likely to require extra support (94%) and often enrolled in school (50%).

Conclusion: Children with LTC or disabilities are a diverse group with varying extra support needs and patterns of participation in ELCC and school engagement. These differences highlight the importance of inclusive, responsive strategies to reduce access gaps and promote early educational engagement.

长期残疾儿童早期学习和儿童保育的参与限制。
背景:患有长期疾病(LTC)或残疾的儿童在早期学习和儿童保育(ELCC)中经常面临参与限制,但对他们的具体挑战知之甚少。本研究使用潜在类别分析(LCA)来确定儿童残疾相关困难的非分类概况,捕捉条件的异质性,而不是具体的条件类别,并检查社会人口统计学和儿童保育参与特征,为共同的挑战和需求提供信息。方法:数据来自《2023年ELCC安排调查- LTC和残疾儿童》,包括1977名0-5岁儿童(占调查样本的98%)。LCA根据家长报告的困难、活动限制、LTC和残疾来确定群体。在整个样本和确定的班级中比较了儿童保育参与、寻找儿童保育困难、额外支持需求和学校参与情况。结果:四类模型最有意义。第一类(相对健康,48%)包括可能在学习、记忆或有时集中注意力方面有困难的儿童。第二类(活动限制和LTC, 14%)包括可能有活动限制(90%)和LTC(80%)的儿童。第三类(LTC, 28%)包括最有可能患有LTC的儿童(95%),但没有活动限制。第四班(残疾儿童,10%)包括最有可能有多种困难和残疾、活动限制和LTC的儿童。相对健康的儿童通常报告健康状况良好或非常好(88%),最不可能需要额外支持(42%)或难以找到托儿服务(37%),入学的情况较少(34%),而残疾儿童最不可能健康状况良好或非常好(50%),最可能需要额外支持(94%),并且经常入学(50%)。结论:LTC或残疾儿童是一个多样化的群体,他们有不同的额外支持需求和参与ELCC和学校参与的模式。这些差异凸显了包容性、响应性战略对于缩小教育机会差距和促进早期教育参与的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Child: care, health and development is an international, peer-reviewed journal which publishes papers dealing with all aspects of the health and development of children and young people. We aim to attract quantitative and qualitative research papers relevant to people from all disciplines working in child health. We welcome studies which examine the effects of social and environmental factors on health and development as well as those dealing with clinical issues, the organization of services and health policy. We particularly encourage the submission of studies related to those who are disadvantaged by physical, developmental, emotional and social problems. The journal also aims to collate important research findings and to provide a forum for discussion of global child health issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书