Maxillofacial trauma secondary to airbag deployment: A scoping review.

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Edson Tadamitsu Tokashiki, Laís Albuquerque Fernandes, Leandro Bottura, Natacha Kalline de Oliveira, Fernando Melhem-Elias, Ricardo Grillo
{"title":"Maxillofacial trauma secondary to airbag deployment: A scoping review.","authors":"Edson Tadamitsu Tokashiki, Laís Albuquerque Fernandes, Leandro Bottura, Natacha Kalline de Oliveira, Fernando Melhem-Elias, Ricardo Grillo","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2026.2642122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Motor vehicle accidents remain a leading cause of craniofacial trauma, with injury severity evolving alongside automotive safety advancements. While airbags and seatbelts have revolutionized trauma prevention, reducing worldwide mortality by over 70,000 lives in five years, their mechanics can paradoxically modify or exacerbate facial injuries due to occupant positioning, chemical factors, and collision dynamics. This study examines injury patterns, mechanisms, and trauma prevention strategies related to airbag-related maxillofacial trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus (up to October 2025). Search terms included \"airbag,\" \"maxillofacial injuries,\" and \"occupant restraint system injuries.\" Inclusion criteria focused on human studies reporting airbag-related facial trauma. Two reviewers independently screened literature, resolving discrepancies via consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Orbital fractures (particularly blow-out fractures) and ocular trauma dominated reported injuries, attributed to blunt force distribution during a car crash with airbag deployment. Soft tissue lesions, chemical burns, and atypical fractures were also documented. Case analyses revealed that injury severity and pattern were highly variable, significantly influenced by risk factors such as pre-impact braking, seatbelt nonuse, and close occupant proximity to the steering wheel. These findings underscore that trauma prevention strategies must extend beyond the presence of safety devices to include public education on optimal occupant positioning and restraint system interactions. Furthermore, continued technological refinements aimed at mitigating deployment kinetics and chemical risks remain critical.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Airbags provide indispensable protection in motor vehicle collisions, yet a balance between their lifesaving benefits and potential for injury requires multidisciplinary collaboration. Future efforts should integrate biomechanical research, clinical findings, and policy updates to improve occupant safety and optimize protective outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2026.2642122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Motor vehicle accidents remain a leading cause of craniofacial trauma, with injury severity evolving alongside automotive safety advancements. While airbags and seatbelts have revolutionized trauma prevention, reducing worldwide mortality by over 70,000 lives in five years, their mechanics can paradoxically modify or exacerbate facial injuries due to occupant positioning, chemical factors, and collision dynamics. This study examines injury patterns, mechanisms, and trauma prevention strategies related to airbag-related maxillofacial trauma.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus (up to October 2025). Search terms included "airbag," "maxillofacial injuries," and "occupant restraint system injuries." Inclusion criteria focused on human studies reporting airbag-related facial trauma. Two reviewers independently screened literature, resolving discrepancies via consensus.

Results: Orbital fractures (particularly blow-out fractures) and ocular trauma dominated reported injuries, attributed to blunt force distribution during a car crash with airbag deployment. Soft tissue lesions, chemical burns, and atypical fractures were also documented. Case analyses revealed that injury severity and pattern were highly variable, significantly influenced by risk factors such as pre-impact braking, seatbelt nonuse, and close occupant proximity to the steering wheel. These findings underscore that trauma prevention strategies must extend beyond the presence of safety devices to include public education on optimal occupant positioning and restraint system interactions. Furthermore, continued technological refinements aimed at mitigating deployment kinetics and chemical risks remain critical.

Conclusion: Airbags provide indispensable protection in motor vehicle collisions, yet a balance between their lifesaving benefits and potential for injury requires multidisciplinary collaboration. Future efforts should integrate biomechanical research, clinical findings, and policy updates to improve occupant safety and optimize protective outcomes.

颌面部创伤继发安全气囊部署:范围审查。
目的:机动车事故仍然是颅面创伤的主要原因,随着汽车安全的进步,损伤的严重程度也在不断变化。虽然安全气囊和安全带已经彻底改变了创伤预防,在五年内减少了全球超过70,000人的死亡,但由于乘员的位置,化学因素和碰撞动力学,它们的力学可能会矛盾地改变或加剧面部损伤。本研究探讨了与安全气囊相关的颌面部创伤的损伤模式、机制和创伤预防策略。方法:对PubMed、谷歌Scholar和Scopus进行范围综述(截至2025年10月)。搜索词包括“安全气囊”、“颌面损伤”和“乘员约束系统损伤”。纳入标准侧重于报告安全气囊相关面部创伤的人体研究。两位审稿人独立筛选文献,通过共识解决差异。结果:眼窝骨折(尤其是爆裂性骨折)和眼部外伤在报告中占主导地位,这是由于在安全气囊展开的汽车碰撞中钝力分布造成的。软组织病变、化学烧伤和非典型骨折也有记录。案例分析显示,损伤的严重程度和模式变化很大,受碰撞前制动、未使用安全带和乘客离方向盘太近等危险因素的影响很大。这些发现强调,创伤预防策略必须超越安全装置的存在,包括关于最佳乘员定位和约束系统相互作用的公共教育。此外,旨在降低部署动力学和化学风险的持续技术改进仍然至关重要。结论:安全气囊在机动车碰撞中提供了不可或缺的保护,但在其挽救生命的好处和潜在的伤害之间取得平衡需要多学科合作。未来的努力应结合生物力学研究、临床发现和政策更新,以提高乘员安全性并优化保护效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书