The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on burden of global injuries: a counterfactual modeling.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kexin Cao, Can Chen, Zhenglin Yuan, Rongrong Qu, Wenkai Zhou, Yi Yang, Mengsha Chen, Jiaxing Qi, Jiani Miao, Xiaoyue Wu, Jingtong Zhou, Anqi Dai, Jiaxin Chen, Shanxiang Xu, Mao Zhang, Shigui Yang
{"title":"The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on burden of global injuries: a counterfactual modeling.","authors":"Kexin Cao, Can Chen, Zhenglin Yuan, Rongrong Qu, Wenkai Zhou, Yi Yang, Mengsha Chen, Jiaxing Qi, Jiani Miao, Xiaoyue Wu, Jingtong Zhou, Anqi Dai, Jiaxin Chen, Shanxiang Xu, Mao Zhang, Shigui Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12963-025-00403-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The global burden of injury is a key indicator for assessing public health and medical needs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this burden was impacted. This study aims to explore how the pandemic influenced the injury burden globally and regionally, and provide recommendations to relieve this burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The burden of injury-related data is derived from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 Study. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and ARIMA-Long short-Term Memory (LSTM) models were adopted for counterfactual inference to predict the scenario without the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the observed global age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of injury exceeded the predicted value by 107.31 per 100,000, and the observed age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR) was higher than the predicted value by 102.81 per 100,000. Self-harm and interpersonal violence saw the largest deviations above predicted values in Europe and parts of Asia. Specifically, Armenia's ASIR was 7,829.33 per 100,000 higher than predicted, and its ASDR exceeded projections by 5,186.32 per 100,000. Besides, traffic injuries exceeded predicted levels most significantly in Southeast Asia, with Indonesia's ASIR 25.48 per 100,000 higher than projected. And the observed ASIR of unintentional injuries in China was 379.61 per 100,000 higher than the predicted value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the global burden of injuries surpassed the predicted levels for a scenario without the pandemic in 2020-2021, especially in Europe and Asia. In addressing an epidemic, prevention and emergency measures for high-burden injury types and key populations should be strengthened based on local socio-cultural contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13137603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-025-00403-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The global burden of injury is a key indicator for assessing public health and medical needs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this burden was impacted. This study aims to explore how the pandemic influenced the injury burden globally and regionally, and provide recommendations to relieve this burden.

Methods: The burden of injury-related data is derived from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 Study. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and ARIMA-Long short-Term Memory (LSTM) models were adopted for counterfactual inference to predict the scenario without the pandemic.

Results: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the observed global age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of injury exceeded the predicted value by 107.31 per 100,000, and the observed age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR) was higher than the predicted value by 102.81 per 100,000. Self-harm and interpersonal violence saw the largest deviations above predicted values in Europe and parts of Asia. Specifically, Armenia's ASIR was 7,829.33 per 100,000 higher than predicted, and its ASDR exceeded projections by 5,186.32 per 100,000. Besides, traffic injuries exceeded predicted levels most significantly in Southeast Asia, with Indonesia's ASIR 25.48 per 100,000 higher than projected. And the observed ASIR of unintentional injuries in China was 379.61 per 100,000 higher than the predicted value.

Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the global burden of injuries surpassed the predicted levels for a scenario without the pandemic in 2020-2021, especially in Europe and Asia. In addressing an epidemic, prevention and emergency measures for high-burden injury types and key populations should be strengthened based on local socio-cultural contexts.

COVID-19大流行对全球伤害负担的影响:一个反事实模型。
背景:全球伤害负担是评估公共卫生和医疗需求的关键指标。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,这一负担受到了影响。本研究旨在探讨流感大流行如何影响全球和区域的伤害负担,并提出减轻这种负担的建议。方法:与伤害相关的负担数据来源于全球疾病负担(GBD) 2021研究。采用自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)和ARIMA-长短期记忆(LSTM)模型进行反事实推理,以预测没有大流行的情景。结果:新冠肺炎大流行期间,损伤的全球年龄标准化发病率(ASIR)超过预测值107.31 / 10万,年龄标准化患病率(ASPR)高于预测值102.81 / 10万。在欧洲和部分亚洲地区,自残和人际暴力与预测值的偏差最大。具体而言,亚美尼亚的ASIR比预期高出7829.33 / 10万,ASDR比预期高出5186.32 / 10万。此外,东南亚地区的交通伤害超过预期水平最为显著,印度尼西亚的ASIR每10万人中有25.48人高于预期。中国非故意伤害的ASIR观测值为379.61 / 10万,高于预测值。结论:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,全球伤害负担超过了2020-2021年无大流行情景下的预测水平,特别是在欧洲和亚洲。在应对流行病时,应根据当地社会文化背景,加强针对高负担伤害类型和关键人群的预防和紧急措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population Health Metrics
Population Health Metrics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书