A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study on the Effectiveness of Triple Inhaled Therapy in Severe Asthma.

IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
David Dacal Rivas, Nagore Blanco Cid, Daniel Pérez Ortiz, Mar Mosteiro Añon, Coral Gonzalez Fernández, Jose M Alvarez Torres, Abel Pallares Sanmartin, Abraham Ali-Munive, Carlos A Torres-Duque, Raquel Ruiz Ferreras, Andrés Blanco Hortas, Carmen Vidal, Luis Pérez de Llano
{"title":"A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study on the Effectiveness of Triple Inhaled Therapy in Severe Asthma.","authors":"David Dacal Rivas, Nagore Blanco Cid, Daniel Pérez Ortiz, Mar Mosteiro Añon, Coral Gonzalez Fernández, Jose M Alvarez Torres, Abel Pallares Sanmartin, Abraham Ali-Munive, Carlos A Torres-Duque, Raquel Ruiz Ferreras, Andrés Blanco Hortas, Carmen Vidal, Luis Pérez de Llano","doi":"10.18176/jiaci.1181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Triple therapy (TT) is effective for asthma patients whose disease remains uncontrolled with dual therapy. However, relevant questions remain unanswered. Objectives: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of TT in a real-world setting; to determine the extent to which it prevents escalation to oral corticosteroids (OCS), azithromycin, or biologics; and to identify factors related to failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective multicenter cohort study. Data were collected at baseline, 16-24 weeks, 52 weeks, and at the last visit. Follow-up extended to treatment escalation or the last visit. Effectiveness of TT was defined as no treatment escalation plus asthma control (Asthma Control Test [ACT] ≥20 and no severe exacerbations in the preceding 12 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 390 patients were analyzed (median follow-up 40.0 months). Of these, 83 (22.5%) escalated treatment; TT was effective in 54% at the last visit. Complete remission (control plus FEV1 ≥80%) was achieved in 20.6%. Severe exacerbations, OCS load, symptoms, and FEV1 improved significantly. The factors associated with failure of TT in the previous year were smoking history (HR 1.84), lack of asthma control at 16-24 weeks (HR 3.41), bronchiectasis (HR 1.91), baseline ACT ≤15 (HR 1.81), ≥2 severe exacerbations in the previous year (HR 2.01), and low eosinophil count (HR 2.58). FEV1 declined >30 mL/year in 25.3% of patients in whom TT was effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TT achieved sustained control in a significant proportion of patients whose disease was not controlled with dual therapy. Bronchiectasis, smoking history, greater clinical severity at initiation of TT, and lack of control at 16-24 weeks predicted poorer outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":50173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.1181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Triple therapy (TT) is effective for asthma patients whose disease remains uncontrolled with dual therapy. However, relevant questions remain unanswered. Objectives: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of TT in a real-world setting; to determine the extent to which it prevents escalation to oral corticosteroids (OCS), azithromycin, or biologics; and to identify factors related to failure.

Methods: Retrospective multicenter cohort study. Data were collected at baseline, 16-24 weeks, 52 weeks, and at the last visit. Follow-up extended to treatment escalation or the last visit. Effectiveness of TT was defined as no treatment escalation plus asthma control (Asthma Control Test [ACT] ≥20 and no severe exacerbations in the preceding 12 months).

Results: A total of 390 patients were analyzed (median follow-up 40.0 months). Of these, 83 (22.5%) escalated treatment; TT was effective in 54% at the last visit. Complete remission (control plus FEV1 ≥80%) was achieved in 20.6%. Severe exacerbations, OCS load, symptoms, and FEV1 improved significantly. The factors associated with failure of TT in the previous year were smoking history (HR 1.84), lack of asthma control at 16-24 weeks (HR 3.41), bronchiectasis (HR 1.91), baseline ACT ≤15 (HR 1.81), ≥2 severe exacerbations in the previous year (HR 2.01), and low eosinophil count (HR 2.58). FEV1 declined >30 mL/year in 25.3% of patients in whom TT was effective.

Conclusions: TT achieved sustained control in a significant proportion of patients whose disease was not controlled with dual therapy. Bronchiectasis, smoking history, greater clinical severity at initiation of TT, and lack of control at 16-24 weeks predicted poorer outcome.

三联吸入治疗重症哮喘疗效的回顾性多中心队列研究。
背景和目的:三联疗法(TT)对双重治疗仍不能控制病情的哮喘患者有效。然而,相关问题仍未得到解答。目的:在现实世界中评估TT的长期有效性;确定它在多大程度上防止升级为口服皮质类固醇(OCS)、阿奇霉素或生物制剂;并找出与失败相关的因素。方法:回顾性多中心队列研究。在基线、16-24周、52周和最后一次就诊时收集数据。随访延长至治疗升级或最后一次就诊。TT治疗的有效性定义为治疗无升级且哮喘得到控制(哮喘控制试验[ACT]≥20且前12个月内无严重恶化)。结果:共分析390例患者(中位随访40.0个月)。其中83例(22.5%)加重治疗;最后一次访视时TT有效率为54%。20.6%的患者达到完全缓解(对照组+ FEV1≥80%)。严重加重、OCS负荷、症状和FEV1显著改善。与前一年TT失败相关的因素有吸烟史(HR 1.84)、16-24周缺乏哮喘控制(HR 3.41)、支气管扩张(HR 1.91)、基线ACT≤15 (HR 1.81)、前一年≥2次严重发作(HR 2.01)和低嗜酸性粒细胞计数(HR 2.58)。在TT有效的患者中,25.3%的患者FEV1下降了30ml /年。结论:在双重治疗无法控制病情的患者中,有相当一部分患者获得了持续的控制。支气管扩张、吸烟史、TT开始时临床严重程度较高,以及16-24周缺乏控制,预测预后较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology (J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol) provides an attractive and very active forum for basic and clinical research in allergology and clinical immunology.Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology publishes original works, reviews, short communications and opinions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书