Spoilt for choice? Temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: The importance of the patient.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Perfusion-Uk Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-05 DOI:10.1177/02676591261424661
Dirk W Donker, Libera Fresiello
{"title":"Spoilt for choice? Temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: The importance of the patient.","authors":"Dirk W Donker, Libera Fresiello","doi":"10.1177/02676591261424661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite major advances in temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS), cardiogenic shock remains associated with high mortality. Early management strategies were dominated by the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), widely adopted on physiological grounds despite limited randomized evidence and later declining use due to downgraded guideline recommendations. Subsequent shifts toward more potent tMCS devices, including transaortic micro-axial flow pumps and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO), were driven by the pursuit of improving systemic perfusion and ventricular unloading. However, enhanced hemodynamic support has not consistently translated into superior clinical outcomes and is frequently accompanied by substantial device-related complications. Increasing recognition of the complex and patient-specific physiology of cardiogenic shock has fueled a transition from device-centred to patient-centred strategies, emphasizing tailored support configurations, multimodal monitoring, and physiology-driven decision-making. Adjunct left ventricular unloading during VA ECMO has emerged as a promising yet controversial approach, with ongoing trials expected to clarify its clinical role. Recent evidence, including the DanGer Shock trial, suggests that timely initiation of appropriately selected tMCS may improve longer-term outcomes in selected populations. Parallel advances in biomedical engineering have enabled physiology-based cardiovascular simulators that allow systematic comparison of tMCS strategies, pharmacological support, and device hemocompatibility under controlled conditions. When extended to virtual populations, these in silico approaches can complement clinical evidence through virtual clinical trials, potentially reducing the size and cost of traditional studies. Together, these developments highlight a new era of patient-centred critical care and biomedical innovation in cardiogenic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":"41 1_suppl","pages":"60S-65S"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591261424661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite major advances in temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS), cardiogenic shock remains associated with high mortality. Early management strategies were dominated by the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), widely adopted on physiological grounds despite limited randomized evidence and later declining use due to downgraded guideline recommendations. Subsequent shifts toward more potent tMCS devices, including transaortic micro-axial flow pumps and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO), were driven by the pursuit of improving systemic perfusion and ventricular unloading. However, enhanced hemodynamic support has not consistently translated into superior clinical outcomes and is frequently accompanied by substantial device-related complications. Increasing recognition of the complex and patient-specific physiology of cardiogenic shock has fueled a transition from device-centred to patient-centred strategies, emphasizing tailored support configurations, multimodal monitoring, and physiology-driven decision-making. Adjunct left ventricular unloading during VA ECMO has emerged as a promising yet controversial approach, with ongoing trials expected to clarify its clinical role. Recent evidence, including the DanGer Shock trial, suggests that timely initiation of appropriately selected tMCS may improve longer-term outcomes in selected populations. Parallel advances in biomedical engineering have enabled physiology-based cardiovascular simulators that allow systematic comparison of tMCS strategies, pharmacological support, and device hemocompatibility under controlled conditions. When extended to virtual populations, these in silico approaches can complement clinical evidence through virtual clinical trials, potentially reducing the size and cost of traditional studies. Together, these developments highlight a new era of patient-centred critical care and biomedical innovation in cardiogenic shock.

太多选择了?心源性休克中的临时机械循环支持:患者的重要性。
尽管临时机械循环支持(tMCS)取得了重大进展,但心源性休克仍然与高死亡率相关。早期的治疗策略主要是主动脉内球囊泵(IABP),尽管随机证据有限,但由于生理原因被广泛采用,后来由于指南建议的降级而减少使用。随后转向更有效的tMCS装置,包括经主动脉微轴流泵和静脉体外膜氧合(VA ECMO),是为了改善全身灌注和心室卸载。然而,增强的血流动力学支持并没有始终转化为良好的临床结果,并且经常伴有大量与器械相关的并发症。越来越多的人认识到心源性休克的复杂和患者特异性生理,这推动了从以设备为中心到以患者为中心的策略的转变,强调了量身定制的支持配置、多模式监测和生理驱动的决策。在VA ECMO期间辅助左心室卸载已成为一种有希望但有争议的方法,正在进行的试验有望阐明其临床作用。最近的证据,包括危险休克试验,表明适时启动适当选择的tMCS可以改善选定人群的长期结果。生物医学工程的平行进展使基于生理学的心血管模拟器能够在受控条件下系统地比较tMCS策略、药理支持和设备血液相容性。当扩展到虚拟人群时,这些计算机方法可以通过虚拟临床试验补充临床证据,潜在地减少传统研究的规模和成本。总之,这些发展突出了以患者为中心的重症监护和心源性休克生物医学创新的新时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书