Christoph Beyersdorf, Helmut Frohnhofen, Jana Albers, Henriette Louise Möllmann, David Latz, Uwe Maus, Carla Stenmanns
{"title":"Observational study on the comparability of the clinical profiles of older adults with hip fractures and pelvic fractures in Germany.","authors":"Christoph Beyersdorf, Helmut Frohnhofen, Jana Albers, Henriette Louise Möllmann, David Latz, Uwe Maus, Carla Stenmanns","doi":"10.1007/s00391-026-02590-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Orthogeriatric co-management (OGCM) significantly improves outcomes in older adults with hip fractures; however, it remains unclear whether older adults with pelvic fractures can similarly benefit. This study aimed to compare clinical and geriatric profiles of older adults with hip fractures and pelvic fractures across relevant medical and geriatric domains. Demonstrating comparable profiles would support future prospective studies evaluating OGCM in patients with pelvic fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from an ongoing observational study at our institution including 611 hospitalized adults aged 70 years or older with hip fractures (n = 535) or pelvic fractures (n = 76). Variables included age, functional status, comorbidity burden and incidence of delirium. Group comparisons were performed using the χ<sup>2</sup>-test for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. After Bonferroni adjustment, a p-value < 0.005 was considered statistically significant. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 85 years (interquartile range 80-89 years) and 69% of patients were female. Hip fractures accounted for 87.6% of cases and pelvic fractures for 12.4%. Both groups showed a high burden of comorbidity and geriatric impairment, including cognitive impairment, functional limitations, frailty and medical comorbidity. Most clinical parameters were comparable between groups. Although surgery was performed much more frequently in the hip fracture group, no significant differences in the overall medical and geriatric profiles were observed except for transfusion rate and postoperative delirium.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older adults with hip fractures and pelvic fractures have largely comparable clinical and geriatric profiles. Given the established benefits of OGCM in hip fracture care, a similar approach could also benefit patients with pelvic fractures. This hypothesis should be evaluated in future prospective interventional studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-026-02590-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/objective: Orthogeriatric co-management (OGCM) significantly improves outcomes in older adults with hip fractures; however, it remains unclear whether older adults with pelvic fractures can similarly benefit. This study aimed to compare clinical and geriatric profiles of older adults with hip fractures and pelvic fractures across relevant medical and geriatric domains. Demonstrating comparable profiles would support future prospective studies evaluating OGCM in patients with pelvic fractures.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from an ongoing observational study at our institution including 611 hospitalized adults aged 70 years or older with hip fractures (n = 535) or pelvic fractures (n = 76). Variables included age, functional status, comorbidity burden and incidence of delirium. Group comparisons were performed using the χ2-test for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. After Bonferroni adjustment, a p-value < 0.005 was considered statistically significant. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University.
Results: The median age was 85 years (interquartile range 80-89 years) and 69% of patients were female. Hip fractures accounted for 87.6% of cases and pelvic fractures for 12.4%. Both groups showed a high burden of comorbidity and geriatric impairment, including cognitive impairment, functional limitations, frailty and medical comorbidity. Most clinical parameters were comparable between groups. Although surgery was performed much more frequently in the hip fracture group, no significant differences in the overall medical and geriatric profiles were observed except for transfusion rate and postoperative delirium.
Conclusion: Older adults with hip fractures and pelvic fractures have largely comparable clinical and geriatric profiles. Given the established benefits of OGCM in hip fracture care, a similar approach could also benefit patients with pelvic fractures. This hypothesis should be evaluated in future prospective interventional studies.
期刊介绍:
The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care.
Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.