Effectiveness of protocol-based medical treatment in selected uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sami Dogan
{"title":"Effectiveness of protocol-based medical treatment in selected uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Sami Dogan","doi":"10.1186/s12893-026-03767-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the short-term treatment outcomes and intermediate-term appendectomy rates following protocol-based medical treatment in carefully selected patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis without appendicolith.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-arm retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary center. Patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis without appendicolith on computed tomography (CT) were treated following a standardized protocol consisting of intravenous antibiotics, a 48-hour in-hospital observation period, and systematic follow-up. The primary outcome was treatment success during initial hospitalization, defined as symptom resolution and discharge without the need for appendectomy. Secondary outcomes included appendectomy rates and complications during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight patients received protocol-based medical treatment. All 68 patients (100%) completed initial hospitalization successfully without requiring appendectomy. During a median follow-up of 2.8 years, six patients (8.8%) underwent appendectomy; however, only one of these (1.5%) represented true symptomatic recurrence, while the remaining five (7.4%) underwent surgery for non-clinical reasons including patient preference, anxiety, and pregnancy-related concerns. No major complications were observed among patients managed with antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Protocol-based medical treatment achieved complete short-term treatment success in this selected cohort of patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis without appendicolith. The overall appendectomy rate during follow-up remained low, with true symptomatic recurrence observed in only one patient. These findings, while limited by the single-arm observational design and small sample size, supported the feasibility of this approach when combined with reliable imaging assessment, systematic patient selection, and structured follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03767-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the short-term treatment outcomes and intermediate-term appendectomy rates following protocol-based medical treatment in carefully selected patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis without appendicolith.

Methods: This single-arm retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary center. Patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis without appendicolith on computed tomography (CT) were treated following a standardized protocol consisting of intravenous antibiotics, a 48-hour in-hospital observation period, and systematic follow-up. The primary outcome was treatment success during initial hospitalization, defined as symptom resolution and discharge without the need for appendectomy. Secondary outcomes included appendectomy rates and complications during the follow-up period.

Results: Sixty-eight patients received protocol-based medical treatment. All 68 patients (100%) completed initial hospitalization successfully without requiring appendectomy. During a median follow-up of 2.8 years, six patients (8.8%) underwent appendectomy; however, only one of these (1.5%) represented true symptomatic recurrence, while the remaining five (7.4%) underwent surgery for non-clinical reasons including patient preference, anxiety, and pregnancy-related concerns. No major complications were observed among patients managed with antibiotics.

Conclusion: Protocol-based medical treatment achieved complete short-term treatment success in this selected cohort of patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis without appendicolith. The overall appendectomy rate during follow-up remained low, with true symptomatic recurrence observed in only one patient. These findings, while limited by the single-arm observational design and small sample size, supported the feasibility of this approach when combined with reliable imaging assessment, systematic patient selection, and structured follow-up.

基于方案的医学治疗在选择性非复杂性急性阑尾炎中的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:描述精心挑选的无阑尾结石的无并发症急性阑尾炎患者在遵医嘱治疗后的短期治疗效果和中期阑尾切除术率。方法:该单臂回顾性队列研究在单一三级中心进行。无并发症急性阑尾炎,CT检查无阑尾结石,采用标准化治疗方案,包括静脉注射抗生素、48小时住院观察期和系统随访。主要结局是首次住院期间的治疗成功,定义为症状缓解和出院,无需阑尾切除术。次要结局包括随访期间阑尾切除率和并发症。结果:68例患者接受了基于方案的医学治疗。所有68例患者(100%)成功完成首次住院治疗,无需阑尾切除术。在中位随访2.8年期间,6名患者(8.8%)接受了阑尾切除术;然而,其中只有一人(1.5%)代表真正的症状性复发,而其余5人(7.4%)因非临床原因接受手术,包括患者偏好、焦虑和妊娠相关问题。使用抗生素治疗的患者未观察到重大并发症。结论:基于方案的医学治疗在这组无阑尾结石的无并发症急性阑尾炎患者中取得了完全的短期治疗成功。随访期间阑尾切除术的总体发生率仍然很低,只有1例患者出现真正的症状性复发。这些发现虽然受到单臂观察设计和小样本量的限制,但当与可靠的影像学评估、系统的患者选择和结构化随访相结合时,支持了该方法的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书