Effect of hydrogen peroxide disinfectant on the flexural strength of different custom impression tray materials fabricated using conventional and digital methods.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ayşe Lengerli Efe, Elifnaz Özen Sütüven, Yurdanur Uçar, Nuray Çapa Yıldırım
{"title":"Effect of hydrogen peroxide disinfectant on the flexural strength of different custom impression tray materials fabricated using conventional and digital methods.","authors":"Ayşe Lengerli Efe, Elifnaz Özen Sütüven, Yurdanur Uçar, Nuray Çapa Yıldırım","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b7003304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim was to evaluate the effect of hydrogen peroxide disinfectant exposure for 60 minutes -representing the longest exposure time recommended for achieving the widest antimicrobial spectrum- on the flexural strength (FS) of 3D-printed (3DP), light-cured (LC) and self-cured (SC) custom tray materials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Rectangular prism-shaped specimens (64 × 10 × 3.3 mm) were fabricated from three custom tray materials; 3DP, LC, and SC. Specimens of each material were randomly divided into disinfected (D) and non-disinfected (ND) subgroups (n = 12). Disinfection was performed by the hydrogen peroxide-containing disinfectant for 60 minutes. FS was evaluated by using a three-point bending test on universal testing device. Data were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Dunnett T3 and Tukey's tests (α = .05). Weibull analysis was applied to assess the reliability and variability of FS values.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Disinfectant had no significant effect on the FS of any tray material (P = .369). Significant differences were found on FS values among the tray material types (P < .001), with the 3DP material exhibiting the highest FS (81.6 ± 13.2 MPa) and the LC material the lowest (16.5 ± 7.6 MPa). 3DP material had the highest Weibull moduli, while LC demonstrated the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hydrogen peroxide disinfection for 60 minutes did not affect the FS of custom impression tray materials. 3DP material demonstrated the highest FS, highlighting its potential as reliable and standardized option for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b7003304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim was to evaluate the effect of hydrogen peroxide disinfectant exposure for 60 minutes -representing the longest exposure time recommended for achieving the widest antimicrobial spectrum- on the flexural strength (FS) of 3D-printed (3DP), light-cured (LC) and self-cured (SC) custom tray materials.

Materials and methods: Rectangular prism-shaped specimens (64 × 10 × 3.3 mm) were fabricated from three custom tray materials; 3DP, LC, and SC. Specimens of each material were randomly divided into disinfected (D) and non-disinfected (ND) subgroups (n = 12). Disinfection was performed by the hydrogen peroxide-containing disinfectant for 60 minutes. FS was evaluated by using a three-point bending test on universal testing device. Data were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, post-hoc Dunnett T3 and Tukey's tests (α = .05). Weibull analysis was applied to assess the reliability and variability of FS values.

Result: Disinfectant had no significant effect on the FS of any tray material (P = .369). Significant differences were found on FS values among the tray material types (P < .001), with the 3DP material exhibiting the highest FS (81.6 ± 13.2 MPa) and the LC material the lowest (16.5 ± 7.6 MPa). 3DP material had the highest Weibull moduli, while LC demonstrated the lowest.

Conclusion: Hydrogen peroxide disinfection for 60 minutes did not affect the FS of custom impression tray materials. 3DP material demonstrated the highest FS, highlighting its potential as reliable and standardized option for clinical use.

双氧水消毒液对传统和数字方法制作的不同定制压模托盘材料抗弯强度的影响。
目的:目的是评估过氧化氢消毒剂暴露60分钟的效果-代表建议的最长暴露时间,以实现最广泛的抗菌光谱-对3d打印(3DP),光固化(LC)和自固化(SC)定制托盘材料的弯曲强度(FS)。材料与方法:由三种定制的托盘材料制成矩形棱柱形试样(64 × 10 × 3.3 mm);3DP, LC和SC。每种材料的标本随机分为消毒(D)和未消毒(ND)亚组(n = 12)。用含双氧水的消毒液消毒60分钟。在万能试验装置上采用三点弯曲试验对FS进行评价。采用双因素方差分析、单因素方差分析、事后Dunnett T3检验和Tukey’s检验对数据进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。采用威布尔分析评估FS值的可靠性和可变性。结果:消毒液对各种托盘材料的FS无显著影响(P = .369)。不同托盘材料的FS值差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),其中3DP材料的FS值最高(81.6±13.2 MPa), LC材料的FS值最低(16.5±7.6 MPa)。3DP材料的威布尔模量最高,LC材料的威布尔模量最低。结论:双氧水消毒60分钟不影响定制压印盘材料的FS。3d打印材料表现出最高的FS,突出了其作为临床使用的可靠和标准化选择的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry
International Journal of Computerized Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书