Comparative effects of tabata-based HIIT modalities on physical performance in competitive table tennis players.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Mahmut Esat Uzun, Alirıza Han Civan
{"title":"Comparative effects of tabata-based HIIT modalities on physical performance in competitive table tennis players.","authors":"Mahmut Esat Uzun, Alirıza Han Civan","doi":"10.1186/s13102-026-01690-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to examine the differential effects of two Tabata-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) modalities-calisthenic/plyometric-focused versus kettlebell-focused exercise-on neuromuscular performance and physiological adaptations in competitive table tennis athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four male athletes (aged 18-24 years) were randomly assigned to a calisthenic/plyometric HIIT group (n = 12) or a kettlebell HIIT group (n = 12). Both groups performed their respective Tabata protocols in addition to regular table tennis training, three days per week for eight weeks. Flexibility, agility, sprint performance, vertical jump height, peak and average power output, and maximal oxygen uptake (VO₂max) were assessed before and after the intervention. Analysis of normally distributed data was performed using a 2 (group) × 2 (time) mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA). When significant interaction effects were detected, post-hoc comparisons were conducted using paired t-tests with Bonferroni correction. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both HIIT methods resulted in significant improvements in most measured parameters (p < 0.05). The calisthenic/plyometric protocol led to greater gains in agility, flexibility, and vertical jump performance, indicating enhanced neuromuscular function. Conversely, the kettlebell protocol elicited superior improvements in sprint performance. Both groups demonstrated increases in VO₂max; however, these changes were not significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tabata-based HIIT effectively enhances neuromuscular and physiological performance in table tennis athletes; however, adaptations differ based on exercise modality. Calisthenic/plyometric-focused HIIT preferentially improves agility, mobility, and explosive leg power, while kettlebell-focused HIIT yields greater benefits for speed and aerobic capacity. These findings demonstrate that modality-specific HIIT programming is a practical and time-efficient approach to target sport-specific performance demands in racket sport athletes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07403461), registered on 16/01/2026.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01690-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to examine the differential effects of two Tabata-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) modalities-calisthenic/plyometric-focused versus kettlebell-focused exercise-on neuromuscular performance and physiological adaptations in competitive table tennis athletes.

Methods: Twenty-four male athletes (aged 18-24 years) were randomly assigned to a calisthenic/plyometric HIIT group (n = 12) or a kettlebell HIIT group (n = 12). Both groups performed their respective Tabata protocols in addition to regular table tennis training, three days per week for eight weeks. Flexibility, agility, sprint performance, vertical jump height, peak and average power output, and maximal oxygen uptake (VO₂max) were assessed before and after the intervention. Analysis of normally distributed data was performed using a 2 (group) × 2 (time) mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA). When significant interaction effects were detected, post-hoc comparisons were conducted using paired t-tests with Bonferroni correction. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: Both HIIT methods resulted in significant improvements in most measured parameters (p < 0.05). The calisthenic/plyometric protocol led to greater gains in agility, flexibility, and vertical jump performance, indicating enhanced neuromuscular function. Conversely, the kettlebell protocol elicited superior improvements in sprint performance. Both groups demonstrated increases in VO₂max; however, these changes were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusion: Tabata-based HIIT effectively enhances neuromuscular and physiological performance in table tennis athletes; however, adaptations differ based on exercise modality. Calisthenic/plyometric-focused HIIT preferentially improves agility, mobility, and explosive leg power, while kettlebell-focused HIIT yields greater benefits for speed and aerobic capacity. These findings demonstrate that modality-specific HIIT programming is a practical and time-efficient approach to target sport-specific performance demands in racket sport athletes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07403461), registered on 16/01/2026.

基于tabata的HIIT模式对竞技乒乓球运动员身体表现的比较影响。
背景:本研究旨在研究两种基于tabata的高强度间歇训练(HIIT)模式——以健体/增强训练为重点的运动与以壶铃为重点的运动——对竞技乒乓球运动员神经肌肉表现和生理适应的不同影响。方法:24名男性运动员(18-24岁)随机分为健美体/增力HIIT组(n = 12)和壶铃HIIT组(n = 12)。除了常规的乒乓球训练外,两组都进行了各自的Tabata协议,每周三天,持续八周。在干预前后评估柔韧性、敏捷性、冲刺表现、垂直跳跃高度、峰值和平均功率输出、最大摄氧量(vo2max)。正态分布数据采用2(组)× 2(时间)混合设计方差分析(ANOVA)进行分析。当检测到显著的相互作用效应时,使用配对t检验和Bonferroni校正进行事后比较。结果:两种HIIT方法在大多数测量参数上都有显著改善(p)。结论:基于tabata的HIIT有效地提高了乒乓球运动员的神经肌肉和生理表现,然而,适应程度因运动方式而不同。以健美操/增强训练为重点的HIIT优先提高敏捷性、机动性和腿部爆发力,而以壶铃为重点的HIIT在速度和有氧能力方面有更大的好处。这些研究结果表明,针对特定运动方式的HIIT规划是一种实用且高效的方法,可以针对球拍运动运动员的特定运动表现需求。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07403461),注册日期为2026年1月16日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书