Experiential Interventions for Externalizing Behavior: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Adolescents and Adults.

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Larissa M Hoogsteder, Maartje W Kapteijns, Hester L van der Veld, Nina T A Gielen, Marieke H Plug, Geert Jan J J M Stams
{"title":"Experiential Interventions for Externalizing Behavior: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Adolescents and Adults.","authors":"Larissa M Hoogsteder, Maartje W Kapteijns, Hester L van der Veld, Nina T A Gielen, Marieke H Plug, Geert Jan J J M Stams","doi":"10.1177/0306624X261445116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of experiential interventions in reducing persistent externalizing behavior among adolescents and adults, and whether integrating cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) components enhances outcomes. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Ovid identified 39 studies, yielding 123 effect sizes (<i>N</i> = 2,323). A three-level meta-analytic model with moderator analyses was conducted. Experiential interventions showed a significant medium effect in favor of the interventions compared to control conditions (<i>g</i> = 0.66). Interventions integrating CBT produced larger effects (<i>g</i> = 0.83) than those without CBT (<i>g</i> = 0.43), with the strongest effects for responsive CBT (<i>g</i> = 1.04 vs. <i>g</i> = 0.59). Treatment fidelity and active system involvement significantly moderated outcomes. Findings support integrating CBT within experiential approaches while ensuring high treatment fidelity and system involvement. Clinicians should combine CBT with experiential techniques and engage others to enhance responsiveness and therapeutic safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":48041,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology","volume":" ","pages":"1437-1474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X261445116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of experiential interventions in reducing persistent externalizing behavior among adolescents and adults, and whether integrating cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) components enhances outcomes. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Ovid identified 39 studies, yielding 123 effect sizes (N = 2,323). A three-level meta-analytic model with moderator analyses was conducted. Experiential interventions showed a significant medium effect in favor of the interventions compared to control conditions (g = 0.66). Interventions integrating CBT produced larger effects (g = 0.83) than those without CBT (g = 0.43), with the strongest effects for responsive CBT (g = 1.04 vs. g = 0.59). Treatment fidelity and active system involvement significantly moderated outcomes. Findings support integrating CBT within experiential approaches while ensuring high treatment fidelity and system involvement. Clinicians should combine CBT with experiential techniques and engage others to enhance responsiveness and therapeutic safety.

外化行为的经验干预:青少年和成人的多水平荟萃分析。
本荟萃分析检验了经验性干预在减少青少年和成人持续外化行为方面的有效性,以及整合认知行为疗法(CBT)成分是否能提高结果。遵循PRISMA指南,系统检索了ERIC、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和Ovid,确定了39项研究,产生123个效应值(N = 2323)。采用调节因子分析的三层次元分析模型。与对照条件相比,经验干预显示出显著的中等效应(g = 0.66)。结合CBT的干预比不结合CBT的干预产生更大的效果(g = 0.83) (g = 0.43),其中反应性CBT的效果最强(g = 1.04比g = 0.59)。治疗保真度和主动系统参与显著调节了结果。研究结果支持将CBT整合到经验方法中,同时确保高治疗保真度和系统参与。临床医生应该将CBT与经验技术结合起来,并让他人参与进来,以提高反应性和治疗安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Press/Politics is an interdisciplinary journal for the analysis and discussion of the role of the press and politics in a globalized world. The Journal is interested in theoretical and empirical research on the linkages between the news media and political processes and actors. Special attention is given to the following subjects: the press and political institutions (e.g. the state, government, political parties, social movements, unions, interest groups, business), the politics of media coverage of social and cultural issues (e.g. race, language, health, environment, gender, nationhood, migration, labor), the dynamics and effects of political communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书