Short-term outcome of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients of acute respiratory distress syndrome presenting at a tertiary care centre - An observational study.

IF 1.5 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung India Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-30 DOI:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_451_25
Khuram Maqbool, Munish Chauhan, Sandeep Dewan
{"title":"Short-term outcome of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients of acute respiratory distress syndrome presenting at a tertiary care centre - An observational study.","authors":"Khuram Maqbool, Munish Chauhan, Sandeep Dewan","doi":"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_451_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe and potentially fatal condition characterised by inflammation and damage to the lungs. Veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of life support that can be used in the management of ARDS. This study was done to evaluate the short-term outcome of VV ECMO in patients of ARDS presenting at our institute.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>This ambispective observational study was carried out on patients with severe ARDS on VV ECMO admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Parameters studied included duration of pre-ECMO and total duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of ECMO, length of stay in ICU, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality from the case records. The APACHE II, SOFA, and Murray scores were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the ARDS patients in our study was 48.70 ± 12.06 years. Out of 70 study patients, 41 were male and 29 were female. The most common underlying causes of ARDS requiring VV ECMO were pneumonia and sepsis. The primary indication for ECMO initiation in all patients was refractory hypoxemia despite optimal conventional ventilation. The rate of mortality was significantly higher in patients with pneumonia (44.7%) and sepsis (44.4%). The mean duration of mechanical ventilation and the mean duration of ECMO were 21.86 ± 13.19 days and 16.35 ± 10.11 days, respectively. The mean duration of ICU and hospital stay in our study was 23.26 ± 12.25 days and 27.33 ± 14.44 days, respectively. The proportion of survivors (58.6%) was higher than that of non-survivors (41.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VV ECMO can be used as a treatment option for patients with severe ARDS who are failing conventional mechanical ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47462,"journal":{"name":"Lung India","volume":"43 3","pages":"297-303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13186488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_451_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe and potentially fatal condition characterised by inflammation and damage to the lungs. Veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of life support that can be used in the management of ARDS. This study was done to evaluate the short-term outcome of VV ECMO in patients of ARDS presenting at our institute.

Materials: This ambispective observational study was carried out on patients with severe ARDS on VV ECMO admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Parameters studied included duration of pre-ECMO and total duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of ECMO, length of stay in ICU, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality from the case records. The APACHE II, SOFA, and Murray scores were also recorded.

Results: The mean age of the ARDS patients in our study was 48.70 ± 12.06 years. Out of 70 study patients, 41 were male and 29 were female. The most common underlying causes of ARDS requiring VV ECMO were pneumonia and sepsis. The primary indication for ECMO initiation in all patients was refractory hypoxemia despite optimal conventional ventilation. The rate of mortality was significantly higher in patients with pneumonia (44.7%) and sepsis (44.4%). The mean duration of mechanical ventilation and the mean duration of ECMO were 21.86 ± 13.19 days and 16.35 ± 10.11 days, respectively. The mean duration of ICU and hospital stay in our study was 23.26 ± 12.25 days and 27.33 ± 14.44 days, respectively. The proportion of survivors (58.6%) was higher than that of non-survivors (41.4%).

Conclusion: VV ECMO can be used as a treatment option for patients with severe ARDS who are failing conventional mechanical ventilation.

三级护理中心急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者静脉-静脉体外膜氧合的短期疗效-一项观察性研究。
背景和目的:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是一种以肺部炎症和损伤为特征的严重且可能致命的疾病。静脉-静脉(VV)体外膜氧合(ECMO)是一种生命支持形式,可用于ARDS的治疗。本研究旨在评估在我院就诊的ARDS患者行VV ECMO的短期疗效。材料:本研究对重症监护病房(ICU)的VV ECMO重症ARDS患者进行了双视角观察研究。研究的参数包括ECMO前持续时间和机械通气总持续时间、ECMO持续时间、ICU住院时间、住院时间和病例记录中的住院死亡率。同时记录APACHEⅱ、SOFA和Murray评分。结果:本组ARDS患者平均年龄为48.70±12.06岁。在70名研究患者中,41名男性,29名女性。需要VV ECMO的ARDS最常见的潜在原因是肺炎和败血症。所有患者开始ECMO的主要指征是难治性低氧血症,尽管有最佳的常规通气。肺炎(44.7%)和脓毒症(44.4%)患者的死亡率明显更高。机械通气和ECMO的平均持续时间分别为21.86±13.19天和16.35±10.11天。本组患者平均ICU时间为23.26±12.25天,平均住院时间为27.33±14.44天。幸存者的比例(58.6%)高于非幸存者(41.4%)。结论:VV ECMO可作为常规机械通气失败的重症ARDS患者的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung India
Lung India RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书