Detecting Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Using Qualitative Analyses and Machine Learning Algorithms.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Prevention Science Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-06 DOI:10.1007/s11121-026-01923-1
Ying Zhang, Jun Fang, Ambika Krishnakumar
{"title":"Detecting Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Using Qualitative Analyses and Machine Learning Algorithms.","authors":"Ying Zhang, Jun Fang, Ambika Krishnakumar","doi":"10.1007/s11121-026-01923-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors increasingly use social media platforms to share their experiences and to seek help and support for their IPV-related concerns. IPV evidence extracted from social media platforms can provide valuable information and complement data obtained from conventional data sources (e.g., self-reports and interviews) thereby enhancing our understanding of IPV victimization. This study addressed three research questions: (1) What range of IPV behaviors emerge through qualitative coding? (2) To what extent do machine learning (ML) based text classifications yield results comparable to qualitative coding of IPV behaviors? and (3) Do the conceptualizations that emerge from unsupervised ML capture additional behaviors or contextual information not identified through qualitative analyses? We analyzed 400 posts from women on IPV-related online forums using qualitative content analysis and two ML approaches: supervised text classification and unsupervised topic modeling (Latent Dirichlet Allocation). Supervised learning approaches, notably Random Forest and Neural Networks, proved effective in classifying IPV violence subtypes with high accuracy (F1 scores .62 - .85). A comparison of findings from the qualitative and topic modeling approaches supported the presence of distinct characteristics of IPV: physical and sexual violence, psychological/emotional abuse, and coercive control. The ML model revealed vocabulary patterns consistent with relational and child-related contexts, temporal and frequency indicators of violence, references to legal system engagement, and spatial contexts, elements that were less captured through thematic qualitative coding alone. The consistency of findings across qualitative and ML approaches points to the potential of leveraging ML techniques when analyzing qualitative data, thus enabling the development of timely and effective IPV interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":"1176-1190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13550090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-026-01923-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors increasingly use social media platforms to share their experiences and to seek help and support for their IPV-related concerns. IPV evidence extracted from social media platforms can provide valuable information and complement data obtained from conventional data sources (e.g., self-reports and interviews) thereby enhancing our understanding of IPV victimization. This study addressed three research questions: (1) What range of IPV behaviors emerge through qualitative coding? (2) To what extent do machine learning (ML) based text classifications yield results comparable to qualitative coding of IPV behaviors? and (3) Do the conceptualizations that emerge from unsupervised ML capture additional behaviors or contextual information not identified through qualitative analyses? We analyzed 400 posts from women on IPV-related online forums using qualitative content analysis and two ML approaches: supervised text classification and unsupervised topic modeling (Latent Dirichlet Allocation). Supervised learning approaches, notably Random Forest and Neural Networks, proved effective in classifying IPV violence subtypes with high accuracy (F1 scores .62 - .85). A comparison of findings from the qualitative and topic modeling approaches supported the presence of distinct characteristics of IPV: physical and sexual violence, psychological/emotional abuse, and coercive control. The ML model revealed vocabulary patterns consistent with relational and child-related contexts, temporal and frequency indicators of violence, references to legal system engagement, and spatial contexts, elements that were less captured through thematic qualitative coding alone. The consistency of findings across qualitative and ML approaches points to the potential of leveraging ML techniques when analyzing qualitative data, thus enabling the development of timely and effective IPV interventions.

使用定性分析和机器学习算法检测亲密伴侣暴力模式。
亲密伴侣暴力幸存者越来越多地使用社交媒体平台来分享他们的经历,并就其与亲密伴侣暴力有关的问题寻求帮助和支持。从社交媒体平台提取的IPV证据可以提供有价值的信息,并补充从传统数据源(如自我报告和访谈)获得的数据,从而增强我们对IPV受害的理解。本研究解决了三个研究问题:(1)定性编码产生的IPV行为范围是什么?(2)基于机器学习(ML)的文本分类在多大程度上产生与IPV行为定性编码相当的结果?(3)从无监督机器学习中产生的概念化是否捕获了定性分析未识别的其他行为或上下文信息?我们使用定性内容分析和两种机器学习方法(有监督文本分类和无监督主题建模(潜狄利克雷分配))分析了400篇来自女性的ipvv相关在线论坛帖子。有监督学习方法,特别是随机森林和神经网络,在分类IPV暴力亚型方面被证明是有效的,并且具有很高的准确性(F1分数)。62 - 0.85)。对定性和主题建模方法的结果进行比较,支持IPV存在明显的特征:身体和性暴力、心理/情感虐待和强制控制。ML模型揭示了与关系和儿童相关背景、暴力的时间和频率指标、对法律体系参与的参考以及空间背景相一致的词汇模式,这些元素仅通过主题定性编码很难捕捉到。定性和ML方法的一致性表明,在分析定性数据时利用ML技术具有潜力,从而能够开发及时有效的IPV干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prevention Science
Prevention Science PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.40%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书