Diagnostic accuracy of IHDS and MoCA in screening for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders among adults living with HIV in Ethiopia.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mulualem Kelebie, Gebresilassie Tadesse, Setegn Fentahun, Girum Nakie, Birtukan Fasil, Gidey Rtbey, Dawed Ali, Girmaw Medfu Takelle, Yeneneh Workie, Zemene Yiglet, Mulu Getnet, Getasew Kibralew
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of IHDS and MoCA in screening for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders among adults living with HIV in Ethiopia.","authors":"Mulualem Kelebie, Gebresilassie Tadesse, Setegn Fentahun, Girum Nakie, Birtukan Fasil, Gidey Rtbey, Dawed Ali, Girmaw Medfu Takelle, Yeneneh Workie, Zemene Yiglet, Mulu Getnet, Getasew Kibralew","doi":"10.1186/s13033-026-00711-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain prevalent among adults living with HIV, even in the era of sustained antiretroviral therapy (ART). Accurate screening for HAND remains a challenge in resource-limited settings like Ethiopia, as comprehensive neuropsychological assessments thought effective are often limited by their high demands for time, specialized personnel, and logistical resources. The International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are brief cognitive screening tools commonly used in clinical settings; however, their diagnostic accuracy for detecting HAND in the Ethiopian population has not been well established. This study aims to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the IHDS and MoCA in identifying HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder among adults living with HIV in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted among 290 adults living with HIV attending three primary hospitals in Ethiopia. Participants aged ≥ 18 years were recruited using systematic random sampling. Clinical data, including baseline CD4⁺ T-cell counts and recent viral load measurements, were extracted from medical records. Cognitive function was assessed using the IHDS and MoCA, with the Frascati criteria used as the diagnostic reference standard, and factors independently associated with IHDS scores were identified through multivariable linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 290 adults living with HIV, with a mean age of 40.6 ± 8.04 years. Based on the Frascati criteria, 43.4% of participants exhibited HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), with asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment being the most common subtype (25.4%), followed by mild neurocognitive disorder (13.3%) and HIV-associated dementia (4.7%). Using the International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS), 47.9% of participants were identified as cognitively impaired, indicating possible HAND, whereas the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) identified 36.2% as impaired. The IHDS demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, with an optimal cutoff score of ≤ 10 (sensitivity 85.3% and specificity 77%), compared to the MoCA at a cutoff score of 21 (sensitivity 62.1% and specificity 81%). Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that higher educational attainment (β = 0.30, p = 0.005) and male sex (β = 0.41, p = 0.045) were independently associated with better neurocognitive performance, while being unmarried (β = -0.29, p = 0.01) and a longer duration of antiretroviral therapy (β = -0.26, p = 0.04) were significantly associated with poorer cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders remain highly prevalent among adults living with HIV in Ethiopia. The IHDS demonstrated better sensitivity than the MoCA for detecting HAND, making it a more suitable screening tool in resource-limited settings. Educational status, sex, marital status, and duration of ART were significant predictors of cognitive performance. Integrating routine cognitive screening using IHDS may improve early identification and management of HAND.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13317224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-026-00711-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain prevalent among adults living with HIV, even in the era of sustained antiretroviral therapy (ART). Accurate screening for HAND remains a challenge in resource-limited settings like Ethiopia, as comprehensive neuropsychological assessments thought effective are often limited by their high demands for time, specialized personnel, and logistical resources. The International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are brief cognitive screening tools commonly used in clinical settings; however, their diagnostic accuracy for detecting HAND in the Ethiopian population has not been well established. This study aims to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the IHDS and MoCA in identifying HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder among adults living with HIV in Ethiopia.

Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted among 290 adults living with HIV attending three primary hospitals in Ethiopia. Participants aged ≥ 18 years were recruited using systematic random sampling. Clinical data, including baseline CD4⁺ T-cell counts and recent viral load measurements, were extracted from medical records. Cognitive function was assessed using the IHDS and MoCA, with the Frascati criteria used as the diagnostic reference standard, and factors independently associated with IHDS scores were identified through multivariable linear regression.

Results: The study included 290 adults living with HIV, with a mean age of 40.6 ± 8.04 years. Based on the Frascati criteria, 43.4% of participants exhibited HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), with asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment being the most common subtype (25.4%), followed by mild neurocognitive disorder (13.3%) and HIV-associated dementia (4.7%). Using the International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS), 47.9% of participants were identified as cognitively impaired, indicating possible HAND, whereas the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) identified 36.2% as impaired. The IHDS demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, with an optimal cutoff score of ≤ 10 (sensitivity 85.3% and specificity 77%), compared to the MoCA at a cutoff score of 21 (sensitivity 62.1% and specificity 81%). Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that higher educational attainment (β = 0.30, p = 0.005) and male sex (β = 0.41, p = 0.045) were independently associated with better neurocognitive performance, while being unmarried (β = -0.29, p = 0.01) and a longer duration of antiretroviral therapy (β = -0.26, p = 0.04) were significantly associated with poorer cognitive outcomes.

Conclusion: HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders remain highly prevalent among adults living with HIV in Ethiopia. The IHDS demonstrated better sensitivity than the MoCA for detecting HAND, making it a more suitable screening tool in resource-limited settings. Educational status, sex, marital status, and duration of ART were significant predictors of cognitive performance. Integrating routine cognitive screening using IHDS may improve early identification and management of HAND.

IHDS和MoCA在埃塞俄比亚成年艾滋病毒感染者中筛查艾滋病毒相关神经认知障碍的诊断准确性
背景:即使在持续抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的时代,艾滋病毒相关神经认知障碍(HAND)在成年艾滋病毒感染者中仍然普遍存在。在埃塞俄比亚等资源有限的环境中,准确筛查HAND仍然是一个挑战,因为被认为有效的全面神经心理学评估往往受到时间、专业人员和后勤资源的高要求的限制。国际艾滋病毒痴呆量表(IHDS)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)是临床常用的简短认知筛查工具;然而,它们在埃塞俄比亚人群中检测HAND的诊断准确性尚未得到很好的证实。本研究旨在评估和比较IHDS和MoCA在埃塞俄比亚成年HIV感染者中识别HIV相关神经认知障碍的敏感性和特异性。方法:在埃塞俄比亚三家初级医院就诊的290名成年艾滋病毒感染者中进行了一项多中心横断面研究。参与者年龄≥18岁,采用系统随机抽样。临床数据,包括基线CD4 + t细胞计数和最近的病毒载量测量,从医疗记录中提取。采用IHDS和MoCA评估认知功能,以Frascati标准作为诊断参考标准,并通过多变量线性回归确定与IHDS评分独立相关的因素。结果:纳入290例成人HIV感染者,平均年龄40.6±8.04岁。根据Frascati标准,43.4%的参与者表现出hiv相关神经认知障碍(HAND),无症状神经认知障碍是最常见的亚型(25.4%),其次是轻度神经认知障碍(13.3%)和hiv相关痴呆(4.7%)。使用国际艾滋病毒痴呆量表(IHDS), 47.9%的参与者被确定为认知受损,表明可能是HAND,而蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)确定36.2%的参与者受损。与MoCA的21分(灵敏度62.1%,特异性81%)相比,IHDS表现出更好的诊断性能,其最佳临界值≤10(敏感性85.3%,特异性77%)。多变量线性回归分析显示,较高的受教育程度(β = 0.30, p = 0.005)和男性(β = 0.41, p = 0.045)与较好的神经认知表现独立相关,而未婚(β = -0.29, p = 0.01)和较长的抗逆转录病毒治疗时间(β = -0.26, p = 0.04)与较差的认知结果显著相关。结论:在埃塞俄比亚,艾滋病毒相关的神经认知障碍在成年艾滋病毒感染者中仍然非常普遍。IHDS在检测HAND方面比MoCA具有更好的灵敏度,使其成为资源有限环境下更合适的筛查工具。教育状况、性别、婚姻状况和抗逆转录病毒治疗持续时间是认知表现的重要预测因素。结合IHDS的常规认知筛查可以改善HAND的早期识别和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书