Does long-term care insurance promote assistive device utilization? Evidence from pilot regions in China.

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Xiaoting Liu, Jinjing Fu, Wenxuan Zhu, Hao Lyu, Shimin Li, Yanru Wang
{"title":"Does long-term care insurance promote assistive device utilization? Evidence from pilot regions in China.","authors":"Xiaoting Liu, Jinjing Fu, Wenxuan Zhu, Hao Lyu, Shimin Li, Yanru Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13561-026-00779-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As China's population aging rapidly, long-term care insurance (LTCI) has emerged as a critical policy instrument to address the care needs of older adults. While previous studies have examined the effects of LTCI on service utilization, less is known about its effect on assistive device utilization-a key component in supporting functional independence and reducing caregiver burden. This study examines the association between LTCI benefit design and assistive device use among older adults in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use cross-sectional data from 1,460 older adults residing in elderly care institutions located in non-pilot areas, general LTCI pilot areas (covering care services only), and special LTCI pilot areas (covering both care services and assistive devices). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between LTCI benefit types and assistive device use. Robustness checks were conducted using propensity score matching (PSM), and subgroup analyses were performed by age, education, and household registration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>General LTCI programs that cover care service only were significantly associated with a lower probability of assistive device use, consistent with a potential substitution effect in which subsidized formal care services may replace the need for assistive devices. In contrast, LTCI programs that explicitly include assistive device benefits were associated with a higher probability of assistive device use. These associations were more pronounced among the oldest-old, individuals with urban household registration, and those with lower education levels. Additional analyses indicate that the observed associations are primarily driven by mobility-related devices, whereas estimates for ADL-related devices and total device counts are not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that the design of LTCI benefit packages may influence older adults' care choices and technology adoption. While causal interpretation remains limited, the results highlight the potential role of benefit design in shaping the balance between formal care services and assistive technology use. Expanding assistive device coverage and improving accessibility may help support functional independence among older adults in ageing societies, particularly in underserved rural regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13330377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-026-00779-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As China's population aging rapidly, long-term care insurance (LTCI) has emerged as a critical policy instrument to address the care needs of older adults. While previous studies have examined the effects of LTCI on service utilization, less is known about its effect on assistive device utilization-a key component in supporting functional independence and reducing caregiver burden. This study examines the association between LTCI benefit design and assistive device use among older adults in China.

Methods: We use cross-sectional data from 1,460 older adults residing in elderly care institutions located in non-pilot areas, general LTCI pilot areas (covering care services only), and special LTCI pilot areas (covering both care services and assistive devices). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between LTCI benefit types and assistive device use. Robustness checks were conducted using propensity score matching (PSM), and subgroup analyses were performed by age, education, and household registration.

Results: General LTCI programs that cover care service only were significantly associated with a lower probability of assistive device use, consistent with a potential substitution effect in which subsidized formal care services may replace the need for assistive devices. In contrast, LTCI programs that explicitly include assistive device benefits were associated with a higher probability of assistive device use. These associations were more pronounced among the oldest-old, individuals with urban household registration, and those with lower education levels. Additional analyses indicate that the observed associations are primarily driven by mobility-related devices, whereas estimates for ADL-related devices and total device counts are not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that the design of LTCI benefit packages may influence older adults' care choices and technology adoption. While causal interpretation remains limited, the results highlight the potential role of benefit design in shaping the balance between formal care services and assistive technology use. Expanding assistive device coverage and improving accessibility may help support functional independence among older adults in ageing societies, particularly in underserved rural regions.

长期护理保险促进辅助器具的使用吗?来自中国试点地区的证据。
背景:随着中国人口的快速老龄化,长期护理保险(LTCI)已成为解决老年人护理需求的重要政策工具。虽然以前的研究已经检查了LTCI对服务利用的影响,但对辅助设备利用的影响知之甚少-辅助设备利用是支持功能独立和减轻照顾者负担的关键组成部分。本研究探讨了中国老年人LTCI福利设计与辅助装置使用之间的关系。方法:我们使用了1460名老年人的横断面数据,这些老年人居住在位于非试点地区、一般LTCI试点地区(仅涵盖护理服务)和特殊LTCI试点地区(涵盖护理服务和辅助设备)的老年护理机构。使用逻辑回归模型来估计LTCI获益类型与辅助器具使用之间的关联。采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)进行稳健性检验,并按年龄、教育程度和户籍进行亚组分析。结果:仅涵盖护理服务的一般LTCI计划与辅助装置使用的可能性较低显著相关,这与潜在的替代效应一致,即补贴的正规护理服务可能取代对辅助装置的需求。相比之下,明确包括辅助装置益处的LTCI计划与辅助装置使用的更高可能性相关。这些关联在老年人、城市户籍和教育水平较低的人群中更为明显。其他分析表明,观察到的关联主要是由与移动性相关的设备驱动的,而与adl相关的设备和总设备计数的估计在统计上并不显著。结论:LTCI福利包的设计可能会影响老年人的护理选择和技术采用。虽然因果解释仍然有限,但结果强调了福利设计在形成正式护理服务和辅助技术使用之间的平衡方面的潜在作用。扩大辅助器具覆盖率和改善可及性可能有助于支持老龄化社会中老年人的功能独立,特别是在服务不足的农村地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书