Hai Xu, Huayuan Zhu, Junjie Du, Xiaozhi Wang, Huanhuan Chen, Surong Jiang, Binlin Luo, Wei Sun, Qiao Ke, Liling Chen
{"title":"A study on the Dilemmas faced by Chinese clinical medicine interns preparing for postgraduate entrance examinations: a grounded theory approach.","authors":"Hai Xu, Huayuan Zhu, Junjie Du, Xiaozhi Wang, Huanhuan Chen, Surong Jiang, Binlin Luo, Wei Sun, Qiao Ke, Liling Chen","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2026.2667657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical internship is a critical stage for cultivating clinical competence among medical undergraduates. However, Chinese clinical medicine interns (CMI) often face intense conflicts between completing internships and preparing for the postgraduate entrance examination (PEE), which severely affects the quality of clinical internship and professional development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adopting a grounded theory approach, this study conducted in‑depth interviews with CMI who had experienced an internship and PEE preparation. Data were analyzed using open coding, axial coding, and selective coding to explore the dilemmas and corresponding solutions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three levels of dilemmas were identified: (1) Student‑level dilemmas: limited learning outcomes from internships, pressure for postgraduate advancement, and aspiration‑reality gaps. (2) Teaching‑level dilemmas: low sense of teaching accomplishment and low teaching efficacy. (3) Institutional‑level dilemmas: weak regulation enforcement and misalignment of institutional orientation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To alleviate these conflicts, this study proposes optimizing the internship model, strengthening teaching incentives, redesigning the clinical skill evaluation system, and tightening regulation enforcement. These strategies are expected to foster a supportive clinical learning environment and strengthen the development of competent medical professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"31 1","pages":"2667657"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13142182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2026.2667657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical internship is a critical stage for cultivating clinical competence among medical undergraduates. However, Chinese clinical medicine interns (CMI) often face intense conflicts between completing internships and preparing for the postgraduate entrance examination (PEE), which severely affects the quality of clinical internship and professional development.
Methods: Adopting a grounded theory approach, this study conducted in‑depth interviews with CMI who had experienced an internship and PEE preparation. Data were analyzed using open coding, axial coding, and selective coding to explore the dilemmas and corresponding solutions.
Results: Three levels of dilemmas were identified: (1) Student‑level dilemmas: limited learning outcomes from internships, pressure for postgraduate advancement, and aspiration‑reality gaps. (2) Teaching‑level dilemmas: low sense of teaching accomplishment and low teaching efficacy. (3) Institutional‑level dilemmas: weak regulation enforcement and misalignment of institutional orientation.
Conclusion: To alleviate these conflicts, this study proposes optimizing the internship model, strengthening teaching incentives, redesigning the clinical skill evaluation system, and tightening regulation enforcement. These strategies are expected to foster a supportive clinical learning environment and strengthen the development of competent medical professionals.
期刊介绍:
Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends.
Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to:
-Basic science education
-Clinical science education
-Residency education
-Learning theory
-Problem-based learning (PBL)
-Curriculum development
-Research design and statistics
-Measurement and evaluation
-Faculty development
-Informatics/web