Nathan Hodson, Azka Imran, Saumya Khanna, Ray Jerram
{"title":"Did Financial Incentives Increase 5-11-year-olds' COVID-19 Vaccination? Synthetic Control Method.","authors":"Nathan Hodson, Azka Imran, Saumya Khanna, Ray Jerram","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>During 2020-2021, many states offered financial incentives for COVID-19 vaccinations. Systematic review evidence suggests that this was often effective among adults.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate whether incentives increased vaccination rates among 5-11-year-olds.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The synthetic control method was used.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Minnesota's \"Kids Deserve a Shot\" policy.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Data were drawn from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Census Bureau. Relevant placebo and robustness tests were conducted.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The offer of financial incentives for pediatric COVID-19 vaccinations.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The number of fully vaccinated 5-11-year-olds in Minnesota.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthetic control was well-matched with true Minnesota during the preintervention period. There was no difference between true Minnesota and the synthetic Minnesota during the postintervention period, indicating that the incentive policy had no effect. The robustness checks and placebo tests were all consistent with this result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policymakers attempted various interventions to promote vaccine uptake, including financial incentives. Although this analysis did not find any differences between true Minnesota and synthetic Minnesota during the postintervention period, further research into which factors determine incentive effectiveness will strengthen interventions and protect communities in future public health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: During 2020-2021, many states offered financial incentives for COVID-19 vaccinations. Systematic review evidence suggests that this was often effective among adults.
Objectives: We aimed to investigate whether incentives increased vaccination rates among 5-11-year-olds.
Design: The synthetic control method was used.
Setting: Minnesota's "Kids Deserve a Shot" policy.
Participants: Data were drawn from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Census Bureau. Relevant placebo and robustness tests were conducted.
Intervention: The offer of financial incentives for pediatric COVID-19 vaccinations.
Main outcome measure: The number of fully vaccinated 5-11-year-olds in Minnesota.
Results: The synthetic control was well-matched with true Minnesota during the preintervention period. There was no difference between true Minnesota and the synthetic Minnesota during the postintervention period, indicating that the incentive policy had no effect. The robustness checks and placebo tests were all consistent with this result.
Conclusions: Policymakers attempted various interventions to promote vaccine uptake, including financial incentives. Although this analysis did not find any differences between true Minnesota and synthetic Minnesota during the postintervention period, further research into which factors determine incentive effectiveness will strengthen interventions and protect communities in future public health crises.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.