Did Financial Incentives Increase 5-11-year-olds' COVID-19 Vaccination? Synthetic Control Method.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nathan Hodson, Azka Imran, Saumya Khanna, Ray Jerram
{"title":"Did Financial Incentives Increase 5-11-year-olds' COVID-19 Vaccination? Synthetic Control Method.","authors":"Nathan Hodson, Azka Imran, Saumya Khanna, Ray Jerram","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>During 2020-2021, many states offered financial incentives for COVID-19 vaccinations. Systematic review evidence suggests that this was often effective among adults.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate whether incentives increased vaccination rates among 5-11-year-olds.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The synthetic control method was used.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Minnesota's \"Kids Deserve a Shot\" policy.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Data were drawn from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Census Bureau. Relevant placebo and robustness tests were conducted.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The offer of financial incentives for pediatric COVID-19 vaccinations.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The number of fully vaccinated 5-11-year-olds in Minnesota.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthetic control was well-matched with true Minnesota during the preintervention period. There was no difference between true Minnesota and the synthetic Minnesota during the postintervention period, indicating that the incentive policy had no effect. The robustness checks and placebo tests were all consistent with this result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policymakers attempted various interventions to promote vaccine uptake, including financial incentives. Although this analysis did not find any differences between true Minnesota and synthetic Minnesota during the postintervention period, further research into which factors determine incentive effectiveness will strengthen interventions and protect communities in future public health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: During 2020-2021, many states offered financial incentives for COVID-19 vaccinations. Systematic review evidence suggests that this was often effective among adults.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate whether incentives increased vaccination rates among 5-11-year-olds.

Design: The synthetic control method was used.

Setting: Minnesota's "Kids Deserve a Shot" policy.

Participants: Data were drawn from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Census Bureau. Relevant placebo and robustness tests were conducted.

Intervention: The offer of financial incentives for pediatric COVID-19 vaccinations.

Main outcome measure: The number of fully vaccinated 5-11-year-olds in Minnesota.

Results: The synthetic control was well-matched with true Minnesota during the preintervention period. There was no difference between true Minnesota and the synthetic Minnesota during the postintervention period, indicating that the incentive policy had no effect. The robustness checks and placebo tests were all consistent with this result.

Conclusions: Policymakers attempted various interventions to promote vaccine uptake, including financial incentives. Although this analysis did not find any differences between true Minnesota and synthetic Minnesota during the postintervention period, further research into which factors determine incentive effectiveness will strengthen interventions and protect communities in future public health crises.

财政激励是否增加了5-11岁儿童的COVID-19疫苗接种?综合控制方法。
背景:在2020-2021年期间,许多州为COVID-19疫苗接种提供了财政奖励。系统评价证据表明,这通常对成年人有效。目的:我们旨在调查激励措施是否能提高5-11岁儿童的疫苗接种率。设计:采用综合对照法。背景:明尼苏达州的“孩子应该打针”政策。参与者:数据来自疾病控制与预防中心和美国人口普查局。进行了相关的安慰剂和稳健性检验。干预措施:为儿童COVID-19疫苗接种提供财政奖励。主要结果衡量指标:明尼苏达州5-11岁儿童充分接种疫苗的人数。结果:在干预前,合成对照与真明尼苏达匹配良好。干预后,真实明尼苏达和合成明尼苏达之间没有差异,表明激励政策没有影响。稳健性检查和安慰剂试验均与此结果一致。结论:决策者尝试了各种干预措施来促进疫苗接种,包括财政激励措施。虽然这一分析没有发现在干预后时期真正的明尼苏达和合成的明尼苏达之间有任何差异,但对决定激励有效性的因素的进一步研究将加强干预,并在未来的公共卫生危机中保护社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书