[Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted percutaneous placmemt of acetabular anterior column screws].

Q4 Medicine
Yuping Yang, Jingxia Ma, Xiaoyan Sha, Lin Ma, Wenhui Zhang, Lizhen Fan, Hui Zhang, Huiping Tai
{"title":"[Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted percutaneous placmemt of acetabular anterior column screws].","authors":"Yuping Yang, Jingxia Ma, Xiaoyan Sha, Lin Ma, Wenhui Zhang, Lizhen Fan, Hui Zhang, Huiping Tai","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the learning curve of robot-assisted percutaneous placement of acetabular anterior column screws.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2021 and January 2024, 30 patients undergoing robot-assisted percutaneous acetabular anterior column screw placement performed by the same surgeon were enrolled, including 21 males and 9 females, aged from 27 to 65 years old with a mean of (45.2±17.6) years old, with a disease course ranging from 1 to 9 days with a mean of (1.1±5.3) days. According to the chronological order of surgery, the patients were divided into an early group, a middle group, and a late group, with 10 cases in each group. The number of screws graded as excellent, good, and poor was recorded in each group. Fluoroscopy times, screw planning time, guide wire adjustment times, and total operation time were compared among groups. The learning curve was analyzed using curve regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures was successfully completed in all three groups, without intraoperative or postoperative complications. Postoperative coronal CT showed that in the early group, excellent/good screws were 8/2;in the middle group, excellent/good screws were 9/1;in the late group, excellent/good screws were 9/1. All screws were graded as excellent or good (26/4), without cortical perforation or poor grade screws. There was no significant difference in the proportion of excellent and good screws among the three groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). Fluoroscopy times, screw planning time, guide wire adjustment times, and total operation time:the differences were statistically significant between the early group and the middle group, and between the early group and the late group (<i>P</i><0.05), while no significant difference was found between the middle group and the late group(<i>P</i>>0.05). Curve regression showed that fluoroscopy times, screw planning time, guide wire adjustment times, and total operation time for robot-assisted percutaneous antegrade anterior column screw placement gradually decreased progressively with increasing surgical experience and reached a plateau after approximately 15 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The learning curve of robot-assisted percutaneous acetabular anterior column screw placement is relatively steep, and surgical performance tends to stabilize after about 15 cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"39 4","pages":"395-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the learning curve of robot-assisted percutaneous placement of acetabular anterior column screws.

Methods: Between January 2021 and January 2024, 30 patients undergoing robot-assisted percutaneous acetabular anterior column screw placement performed by the same surgeon were enrolled, including 21 males and 9 females, aged from 27 to 65 years old with a mean of (45.2±17.6) years old, with a disease course ranging from 1 to 9 days with a mean of (1.1±5.3) days. According to the chronological order of surgery, the patients were divided into an early group, a middle group, and a late group, with 10 cases in each group. The number of screws graded as excellent, good, and poor was recorded in each group. Fluoroscopy times, screw planning time, guide wire adjustment times, and total operation time were compared among groups. The learning curve was analyzed using curve regression.

Results: All procedures was successfully completed in all three groups, without intraoperative or postoperative complications. Postoperative coronal CT showed that in the early group, excellent/good screws were 8/2;in the middle group, excellent/good screws were 9/1;in the late group, excellent/good screws were 9/1. All screws were graded as excellent or good (26/4), without cortical perforation or poor grade screws. There was no significant difference in the proportion of excellent and good screws among the three groups (P>0.05). Fluoroscopy times, screw planning time, guide wire adjustment times, and total operation time:the differences were statistically significant between the early group and the middle group, and between the early group and the late group (P<0.05), while no significant difference was found between the middle group and the late group(P>0.05). Curve regression showed that fluoroscopy times, screw planning time, guide wire adjustment times, and total operation time for robot-assisted percutaneous antegrade anterior column screw placement gradually decreased progressively with increasing surgical experience and reached a plateau after approximately 15 cases.

Conclusion: The learning curve of robot-assisted percutaneous acetabular anterior column screw placement is relatively steep, and surgical performance tends to stabilize after about 15 cases.

机器人辅助经皮髋臼前柱螺钉置入的学习曲线分析。
目的:分析机器人辅助经皮髋臼前柱螺钉置入的学习曲线。方法:选取2021年1月至2024年1月,由同一位外科医生行机器人辅助经皮髋臼前柱螺钉置入术的患者30例,其中男性21例,女性9例,年龄27 ~ 65岁,平均(45.2±17.6)岁,病程1 ~ 9天,平均(1.1±5.3)天。根据手术时间顺序分为早期组、中期组和晚期组,每组10例。记录各组螺钉的优、良、差评分。比较两组间透视次数、螺钉计划时间、导丝调整次数及总手术时间。采用曲线回归分析学习曲线。结果:三组手术均顺利完成,无术中、术后并发症。术后冠状位CT显示,早期组优秀/良好螺钉为8/2;中组螺钉优良率为9/1;在晚期组,优秀螺钉和良好螺钉的比例为9/1。所有螺钉均被评为优秀或良好(26/4),无皮质穿孔或不良螺钉。三组间优良型螺钉比例比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。透视次数、螺钉计划时间、导丝调整次数、总手术时间:早期组与中期组、早期组与晚期组比较差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。曲线回归显示,机器人辅助下经皮顺行前柱螺钉置入的透视次数、螺钉计划时间、导丝调整次数和总手术时间随着手术经验的增加逐渐减少,约15例后达到平稳期。结论:机器人辅助经皮髋臼前柱螺钉置入的学习曲线比较陡峭,15例左右手术表现趋于稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书