Usefulness of the Risk Management Plan (RMP) Pocket Edition in Pharmacists' Practice in Community Pharmacies: A Questionnaire-Based Study.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Takashi Omoto, Manato Inagaki, Junichi Asaka, Kenzo Kudo
{"title":"Usefulness of the Risk Management Plan (RMP) Pocket Edition in Pharmacists' Practice in Community Pharmacies: A Questionnaire-Based Study.","authors":"Takashi Omoto, Manato Inagaki, Junichi Asaka, Kenzo Kudo","doi":"10.1248/yakushi.25-00149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk management plan (RMP) utilization in clinical settings has been reported to be insufficient, particularly in community pharmacies. To facilitate the utilization of RMPs in pharmacists' practice, we created an \"RMP Pocket Edition\" by summarizing the RMPs. This exploratory study conducted a questionnaire survey to evaluate the usefulness of the RMP Pocket Edition in pharmacists' practice in community pharmacies within Iwate Prefecture. This study targeted managing pharmacists from 89 community pharmacies who intended to use the RMP Pocket Edition. Responses to specific survey items were measured using a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Of the 89 pharmacies, 56 responded (response rate: 62.9%), and 40 of them utilized the RMP Pocket Edition. The RMP Pocket Edition was most commonly utilized to check patient materials during counseling, assess drug risks while dispensing new medications, and for personal study. All median scores for the pocket book's perceived usefulness across various aspects of pharmacists' practice, including the understanding of RMPs, the identification of adverse drug reactions, and the facilitation of RMP utilization, were 4 or higher on a five-point scale. Further, the median score for the intention to continue utilizing the RMP Pocket Edition in the future was 5 (interquartile range, 4-5). In conclusion, the findings suggest that the RMP Pocket Edition contributes to facilitating the utilization of RMPs in pharmacists' practice in community pharmacies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23810,"journal":{"name":"Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan","volume":"146 5","pages":"525-532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.25-00149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk management plan (RMP) utilization in clinical settings has been reported to be insufficient, particularly in community pharmacies. To facilitate the utilization of RMPs in pharmacists' practice, we created an "RMP Pocket Edition" by summarizing the RMPs. This exploratory study conducted a questionnaire survey to evaluate the usefulness of the RMP Pocket Edition in pharmacists' practice in community pharmacies within Iwate Prefecture. This study targeted managing pharmacists from 89 community pharmacies who intended to use the RMP Pocket Edition. Responses to specific survey items were measured using a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Of the 89 pharmacies, 56 responded (response rate: 62.9%), and 40 of them utilized the RMP Pocket Edition. The RMP Pocket Edition was most commonly utilized to check patient materials during counseling, assess drug risks while dispensing new medications, and for personal study. All median scores for the pocket book's perceived usefulness across various aspects of pharmacists' practice, including the understanding of RMPs, the identification of adverse drug reactions, and the facilitation of RMP utilization, were 4 or higher on a five-point scale. Further, the median score for the intention to continue utilizing the RMP Pocket Edition in the future was 5 (interquartile range, 4-5). In conclusion, the findings suggest that the RMP Pocket Edition contributes to facilitating the utilization of RMPs in pharmacists' practice in community pharmacies.

风险管理计划(RMP)袖珍版在社区药房药剂师实践中的有用性:一项基于问卷的研究。
据报道,风险管理计划(RMP)在临床环境中的应用不足,特别是在社区药房。为方便药师在实际工作中使用《药典》,我们对《药典》进行了总结,制作了《药典袖珍版》。本探索性研究采用问卷调查的方式,评估袖珍版RMP在岩手县社区药房药师实践中的有用性。本研究的目标是来自89家社区药房的管理药剂师,他们打算使用RMP袖珍版。对特定调查项目的回答使用五点李克特量表(1=非常不同意到5=非常同意)进行测量。89家药店中,有56家有应答(应答率为62.9%),其中40家使用RMP袖珍版。RMP袖珍版最常用于咨询期间检查患者材料,在分配新药时评估药物风险,以及个人研究。在药剂师实践的各个方面,包括对RMP的理解、药物不良反应的识别和RMP利用的促进,口袋书的感知有用性的所有中位数得分在五分制中为4分或更高。此外,打算在未来继续使用RMP Pocket Edition的中位数得分为5分(四分位数范围为4-5分)。综上所述,本研究结果表明,药典袖珍版有助于促进药典在社区药房的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
1 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书