Panida Pongvittayanon, Anna Hvidbjerg Poulsen, Cecilie Olsen, Eva González Pérez, Charlotte Reinhard Bjørnvad, Fintan J McEvoy, Mette Louise Halck
{"title":"Optimizing CT-Based Models for Predicting Whole-Body Fat in Rabbits.","authors":"Panida Pongvittayanon, Anna Hvidbjerg Poulsen, Cecilie Olsen, Eva González Pérez, Charlotte Reinhard Bjørnvad, Fintan J McEvoy, Mette Louise Halck","doi":"10.1111/vru.70160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated three computed tomography (CT)-based automatic fat segmentation methods and identified the optimal regression model for predicting whole-body fat in rabbits. CT scans were performed on 21 postmortem companion rabbits to estimate fat percentage (Fat%-CT) and fat volume (FV-CT, mm<sup>3</sup>). Two techniques were used to determine CT number (Hounsfield units [HU]) ranges for fat (HU Ranges 1 and 2). These were applied to four body regions using three voxel counting techniques (one-, two-, and three-dimensional techniques) to quantify Fat%-CT and FV-CT. Data from whole-body chemical carcass analysis (whole-body Fat% and whole-body fat in grams) were used as gold standard values. The relationship between the extracted CT data and carcass fat estimates was determined using a Spearman rank correlation. Simple linear regression and assumption tests were performed to identify the best model for predicting whole-body Fat%, and whole-body fat (g). There was a high correlation between measured fat estimated by CT and by chemical carcass analysis (r<sub>s</sub> > 0.7, p < 0.001) for all but one body region-counting combination. The best model predicting whole-body Fat% used CT data from left kidney region, HU Range 2, and three-dimensional counting technique. The optimal model predicting whole-body fat (g) used CT data from the entire abdominal region, HU Range 1, and a one-dimensional counting technique. The CT-based models for estimating whole-body fat in rabbits are feasible. Model optimization requires appropriate selection of the body region, CT number ranges, and counting techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":23581,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound","volume":"67 3","pages":"e70160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13150672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.70160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluated three computed tomography (CT)-based automatic fat segmentation methods and identified the optimal regression model for predicting whole-body fat in rabbits. CT scans were performed on 21 postmortem companion rabbits to estimate fat percentage (Fat%-CT) and fat volume (FV-CT, mm3). Two techniques were used to determine CT number (Hounsfield units [HU]) ranges for fat (HU Ranges 1 and 2). These were applied to four body regions using three voxel counting techniques (one-, two-, and three-dimensional techniques) to quantify Fat%-CT and FV-CT. Data from whole-body chemical carcass analysis (whole-body Fat% and whole-body fat in grams) were used as gold standard values. The relationship between the extracted CT data and carcass fat estimates was determined using a Spearman rank correlation. Simple linear regression and assumption tests were performed to identify the best model for predicting whole-body Fat%, and whole-body fat (g). There was a high correlation between measured fat estimated by CT and by chemical carcass analysis (rs > 0.7, p < 0.001) for all but one body region-counting combination. The best model predicting whole-body Fat% used CT data from left kidney region, HU Range 2, and three-dimensional counting technique. The optimal model predicting whole-body fat (g) used CT data from the entire abdominal region, HU Range 1, and a one-dimensional counting technique. The CT-based models for estimating whole-body fat in rabbits are feasible. Model optimization requires appropriate selection of the body region, CT number ranges, and counting techniques.
本研究评估了三种基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的自动脂肪分割方法,并确定了预测家兔全身脂肪的最佳回归模型。对21只死后伴侣兔进行CT扫描,估计脂肪百分比(fat %-CT)和脂肪体积(FV-CT, mm3)。采用两种技术确定脂肪的CT数(Hounsfield units [HU])范围(HU范围1和2)。使用三体素计数技术(一维、二维和三维技术)将这些应用于四个身体区域,以量化Fat%- ct和FV-CT。采用全身化学胴体分析数据(全身脂肪%和全身脂肪克数)作为金标准值。提取的CT数据与胴体脂肪估计值之间的关系使用Spearman秩相关确定。采用简单线性回归和假设检验来确定预测全身脂肪%和全身脂肪(g)的最佳模型。CT测量的脂肪与化学胴体分析之间有很高的相关性(rs >.7, p
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is a bimonthly, international, peer-reviewed, research journal devoted to the fields of veterinary diagnostic imaging and radiation oncology. Established in 1958, it is owned by the American College of Veterinary Radiology and is also the official journal for six affiliate veterinary organizations. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is represented on the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, World Association of Medical Editors, and Committee on Publication Ethics.
The mission of Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is to serve as a leading resource for high quality articles that advance scientific knowledge and standards of clinical practice in the areas of veterinary diagnostic radiology, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, nuclear imaging, radiation oncology, and interventional radiology. Manuscript types include original investigations, imaging diagnosis reports, review articles, editorials and letters to the Editor. Acceptance criteria include originality, significance, quality, reader interest, composition and adherence to author guidelines.