Fecal Microbiota Profiling in Indigenous Backyard and Commercial Chickens Reveals Distinct Taxonomic Signatures.

IF 2 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Medicine International Pub Date : 2026-05-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/vmi/3146713
Abdullah Hasib, Stephen Ogada, Susan Maina, Stephen Kuria, Min-Sheng Peng, Jiangkun Yu, Sheila Cecily Ommeh
{"title":"Fecal Microbiota Profiling in Indigenous Backyard and Commercial Chickens Reveals Distinct Taxonomic Signatures.","authors":"Abdullah Hasib, Stephen Ogada, Susan Maina, Stephen Kuria, Min-Sheng Peng, Jiangkun Yu, Sheila Cecily Ommeh","doi":"10.1155/vmi/3146713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Farm management conditions and feeding practices in free-range (backyard), semi-intensive, or intensive production systems significantly influence the poultry gut microbiome, thereby impacting their productive performance and overall health. Here, fecal samples from asymptomatic indigenous backyard chickens raised in a free-range production system, characterized by little to no biosecurity measures in place, and from commercial chickens raised in an intensive production system with enhanced biosecurity measures were subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing analysis. Taxonomic assignment identified 19 bacterial phyla, 137 families, and 238 genera. The most prevalent phyla in indigenous backyard and commercial chickens were <i>Firmicutes</i>, <i>Proteobacteria</i>, <i>Bacteroidetes</i>, <i>Fusobacteria</i>, and <i>Spirochaetes</i>. Similarities were detected between bacterial families and genera in both indigenous backyard and commercial chickens; however, the bacterial family <i>Bacillaceae</i> and genus <i>Anoxybacillus</i> were only observed in commercial chickens. Statistical tests performed to evaluate the alpha-diversity and beta-diversity metrics showed no significant difference in the fecal bacterial microbiota of indigenous backyard and commercial chickens, as indicated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum (<i>p</i> = 0.94) and PERMANOVA tests (<i>p</i> = 0.26). This study highlights bacteria that may affect the growth, development, and health of indigenous and commercial poultry raised under various production systems, thereby providing vital insights for the development of effective poultry farm management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":23503,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine International","volume":"2026 ","pages":"3146713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13139713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/vmi/3146713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farm management conditions and feeding practices in free-range (backyard), semi-intensive, or intensive production systems significantly influence the poultry gut microbiome, thereby impacting their productive performance and overall health. Here, fecal samples from asymptomatic indigenous backyard chickens raised in a free-range production system, characterized by little to no biosecurity measures in place, and from commercial chickens raised in an intensive production system with enhanced biosecurity measures were subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing analysis. Taxonomic assignment identified 19 bacterial phyla, 137 families, and 238 genera. The most prevalent phyla in indigenous backyard and commercial chickens were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria, and Spirochaetes. Similarities were detected between bacterial families and genera in both indigenous backyard and commercial chickens; however, the bacterial family Bacillaceae and genus Anoxybacillus were only observed in commercial chickens. Statistical tests performed to evaluate the alpha-diversity and beta-diversity metrics showed no significant difference in the fecal bacterial microbiota of indigenous backyard and commercial chickens, as indicated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum (p = 0.94) and PERMANOVA tests (p = 0.26). This study highlights bacteria that may affect the growth, development, and health of indigenous and commercial poultry raised under various production systems, thereby providing vital insights for the development of effective poultry farm management practices.

本地后院和商业鸡的粪便微生物群分析揭示了不同的分类特征。
散养(后院)、半集约化或集约化生产系统中的农场管理条件和饲养方法会显著影响家禽肠道微生物群,从而影响其生产性能和整体健康。本研究对在散养生产系统中饲养的无症状本土后院鸡和在加强生物安全措施的集约化生产系统中饲养的商品鸡的粪便样本进行了16S rRNA测序分析。共鉴定出19门137科238属。本土后院和商品鸡中最常见的门是厚壁菌门、变形菌门、拟杆菌门、梭菌门和螺旋体。土养鸡和商品鸡的细菌科属存在相似性;然而,杆菌科和无氧杆菌属细菌仅在商品鸡中发现。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验(p = 0.94)和PERMANOVA检验(p = 0.26)对α -多样性和β -多样性指标进行的统计检验显示,土生鸡和商品鸡的粪便细菌微生物群无显著差异。本研究强调了可能影响在不同生产系统下饲养的本地和商业家禽的生长、发育和健康的细菌,从而为制定有效的家禽养殖场管理实践提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Medicine International
Veterinary Medicine International Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
55
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles and review articles in all areas of veterinary research. The journal will consider articles on the biological basis of disease, as well as diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书