ARC in Critical Ill OLT Recipients: True Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact on Early Aggressive PK/PD Target Non-Attainment of CI Beta-Lactam Therapy for Posttransplant Gram-Negative Infections.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Transplant Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-07 DOI:10.1111/tid.70237
Milo Gatti, Riccardo De Paola, Matteo Rinaldi, Cristiana Laici, Antonio Siniscalchi, Pierluigi Viale, Federico Pea
{"title":"ARC in Critical Ill OLT Recipients: True Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact on Early Aggressive PK/PD Target Non-Attainment of CI Beta-Lactam Therapy for Posttransplant Gram-Negative Infections.","authors":"Milo Gatti, Riccardo De Paola, Matteo Rinaldi, Cristiana Laici, Antonio Siniscalchi, Pierluigi Viale, Federico Pea","doi":"10.1111/tid.70237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the true prevalence and the risk factors of augmented renal clearance (ARC) in critical orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients and its impact on early aggressive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target non-attainment of continuous infusion (CI) beta-lactams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>OLT recipients without renal dysfunction and undergoing one or more measured creatinine clearance (mCLCr) assessments in the first 30 days posttransplant were retrospectively included. Reliability of three different eGFR formulas (Cockcroft-Gault, 2021, CKD-EPI, and MDRD) in estimating mCLCr was tested. Univariate analyses compared the clinical features of ARC versus non-ARC patients and the severity of the clinical conditions during ARC versus non-ARC episodes in the whole cohort. In patients receiving CI beta-lactam therapy, risk factors for early aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 450 critical OLT recipients, 112 were included. The true prevalence of ARC was 23.2%. ARC versus non-ARC patients were younger (p = 0.003), had lower MELD score (p = 0.001), received lower number of intraoperative blood transfusions (p = 0.007), and had a lower need for venovenous bypass technique (p = 0.024). ARC episodes occurred more frequently in patients having lower SOFA score (p = 0.005) and lower median serum creatinine levels (p < 0.001). None of the eGFR formulas properly estimated mCLCr. In the subset of 50 OLT recipients receiving 60 CI beta-lactam treatment courses, ARC was the only factor associated with early aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment (p = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ARC is a quite prevalent condition among critical OLT recipients, which may hinder early aggressive PK/PD target attainment when using standard beta-lactams dosing regimens, regardless of delivery by CI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess the true prevalence and the risk factors of augmented renal clearance (ARC) in critical orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients and its impact on early aggressive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target non-attainment of continuous infusion (CI) beta-lactams.

Methods: OLT recipients without renal dysfunction and undergoing one or more measured creatinine clearance (mCLCr) assessments in the first 30 days posttransplant were retrospectively included. Reliability of three different eGFR formulas (Cockcroft-Gault, 2021, CKD-EPI, and MDRD) in estimating mCLCr was tested. Univariate analyses compared the clinical features of ARC versus non-ARC patients and the severity of the clinical conditions during ARC versus non-ARC episodes in the whole cohort. In patients receiving CI beta-lactam therapy, risk factors for early aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment were investigated.

Results: Among 450 critical OLT recipients, 112 were included. The true prevalence of ARC was 23.2%. ARC versus non-ARC patients were younger (p = 0.003), had lower MELD score (p = 0.001), received lower number of intraoperative blood transfusions (p = 0.007), and had a lower need for venovenous bypass technique (p = 0.024). ARC episodes occurred more frequently in patients having lower SOFA score (p = 0.005) and lower median serum creatinine levels (p < 0.001). None of the eGFR formulas properly estimated mCLCr. In the subset of 50 OLT recipients receiving 60 CI beta-lactam treatment courses, ARC was the only factor associated with early aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment (p = 0.018).

Conclusions: ARC is a quite prevalent condition among critical OLT recipients, which may hinder early aggressive PK/PD target attainment when using standard beta-lactams dosing regimens, regardless of delivery by CI.

危重病人OLT受者的ARC:移植后革兰氏阴性感染的CI - β -内酰胺治疗早期侵袭性PK/PD目标未达到的真实患病率、危险因素和影响
背景:评估原位肝移植(OLT)受者肾脏增强清除率(ARC)的真实患病率和危险因素及其对持续输注(CI) β -内酰胺早期侵袭性药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)目标未达到的影响。方法:回顾性纳入移植后30天内无肾功能障碍且接受一次或多次肌酐清除率(mCLCr)评估的OLT受者。测试了三种不同的eGFR公式(Cockcroft-Gault、2021、CKD-EPI和MDRD)估算mCLCr的可靠性。单变量分析比较了整个队列中ARC与非ARC患者的临床特征以及ARC与非ARC发作期间临床状况的严重程度。在接受CI β -内酰胺治疗的患者中,研究早期侵袭性PK/PD目标未达到的危险因素。结果:450例重度OLT受者中有112例被纳入。ARC的真实患病率为23.2%。ARC患者比非ARC患者更年轻(p = 0.003), MELD评分更低(p = 0.001),术中输血次数更少(p = 0.007),对静脉-静脉旁路技术的需求更低(p = 0.024)。在SOFA评分较低(p = 0.005)和血清肌酐中位数水平较低的患者中,ARC发作更频繁(p)。结论:ARC在危重OLT接受者中相当普遍,当使用标准β -内酰胺给药方案时,可能会阻碍早期侵袭性PK/PD目标的实现,无论CI是否给药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书