L Alibrandi, R Tognetti, V Pellegrini, G Grosso, T Vezzosi
{"title":"Evaluation of a smartphone-based six‑lead ECG for clinical electrocardiography in cats.","authors":"L Alibrandi, R Tognetti, V Pellegrini, G Grosso, T Vezzosi","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2026.106236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smartphone-based electrocardiographic devices (smECGs) are promising tools for both human and veterinary medicine, as they provide greater portability convenience and ease of use than standard methods. Although six‑lead smECG devices have been studied in dogs, there is currently no research on their application in cats. This prospective observational study thus evaluates a six‑lead smECG device in feline clinical practice. A total of forty cats underwent simultaneous ECG recordings with a standard ECG (stECG) and the six‑lead smECG. Heart rhythm was assessed; heart rate, P- and R-wave amplitudes, wave and interval durations and the QRS mean electrical axis were measured. The Bland-Altman plot and Cohen's κ test were used to assess the agreement between the devices. All smECG traces were evaluable. The smECG showed perfect agreement with the stECG in heart rhythm diagnosis (κ = 1) and QRS axis deviation (κ = 1). No clinically significant differences in heart rate or wave and interval duration were observed between the devices. However, the smECG tended to underestimate the P- and R-wave amplitude. The six‑lead smECG device was easy to use and reliable in cats, providing an accurate assessment of heart rhythm and ECG parameters. This tool shows promise for integration into feline clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"208 ","pages":"106236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2026.106236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Smartphone-based electrocardiographic devices (smECGs) are promising tools for both human and veterinary medicine, as they provide greater portability convenience and ease of use than standard methods. Although six‑lead smECG devices have been studied in dogs, there is currently no research on their application in cats. This prospective observational study thus evaluates a six‑lead smECG device in feline clinical practice. A total of forty cats underwent simultaneous ECG recordings with a standard ECG (stECG) and the six‑lead smECG. Heart rhythm was assessed; heart rate, P- and R-wave amplitudes, wave and interval durations and the QRS mean electrical axis were measured. The Bland-Altman plot and Cohen's κ test were used to assess the agreement between the devices. All smECG traces were evaluable. The smECG showed perfect agreement with the stECG in heart rhythm diagnosis (κ = 1) and QRS axis deviation (κ = 1). No clinically significant differences in heart rate or wave and interval duration were observed between the devices. However, the smECG tended to underestimate the P- and R-wave amplitude. The six‑lead smECG device was easy to use and reliable in cats, providing an accurate assessment of heart rhythm and ECG parameters. This tool shows promise for integration into feline clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.