Acceptability of Covid-19 self-testing among Primary Health Care users.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista de saude publica Pub Date : 2026-05-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2026060006399
Fabiane Soares, Laio Magno, Thaís Regis Aranha Rossi, Suelen Seixas, Thiago Silva Torres, Débora Castanheira, Helena Lima, Ana Paula Pitanga, Valdiléa Gonçalves Veloso, Inês Dourado
{"title":"Acceptability of Covid-19 self-testing among Primary Health Care users.","authors":"Fabiane Soares, Laio Magno, Thaís Regis Aranha Rossi, Suelen Seixas, Thiago Silva Torres, Débora Castanheira, Helena Lima, Ana Paula Pitanga, Valdiléa Gonçalves Veloso, Inês Dourado","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2026060006399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify factors associated with the acceptability of Covid-19 self-testing among socioeconomically vulnerable populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study using data from the \"TQT Covid-19\" project, which involved users from 19 primary health care (PHC) units located in socioeconomically vulnerable areas in Salvador (BA) and Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil. Data were collected between July 2022 and July 2023. Descriptive analysis of Covid-19 self-test acceptability was performed, and logistic regression models were used to estimate factors associated with acceptability, with respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7,939 study participants, 45.8% (95%CI 44.75-46.95) reported willingness to use a Covid-19 self-test. In the analysis of associated factors, regarding sociodemographic profile, non-Black individuals (ORa = 1.17; 95%CI 1.02-1.34), cisgender men (ORa = 1.23; 95%CI 1.12-1.37), and participants with higher educational levels (ORa = 1.60; 95%CI 1.43-1.79) were more likely to accept the self-test. Those with prior knowledge of the self-test (ORa = 2.33; 95%CI 2.11-2.58) and those previously diagnosed with Covid-19 (ORa = 1.17; 95%CI 1.05-1.28) also reported higher acceptance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Provision of Covid-19 self-testing should be considered as a complement to testing within the public health system, especially due to its acceptance among vulnerable populations and the difficulties in accessing testing in many Brazilian regions. During periods of increased Covid-19 incidence, self-testing may serve as an important strategy for mass case detection, provided that access and knowledge are expanded so communities can play an active role in SARS-CoV-2 epidemiological surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"60 suppl 1","pages":"e10s"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13138127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2026060006399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify factors associated with the acceptability of Covid-19 self-testing among socioeconomically vulnerable populations.

Methods: Cross-sectional study using data from the "TQT Covid-19" project, which involved users from 19 primary health care (PHC) units located in socioeconomically vulnerable areas in Salvador (BA) and Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil. Data were collected between July 2022 and July 2023. Descriptive analysis of Covid-19 self-test acceptability was performed, and logistic regression models were used to estimate factors associated with acceptability, with respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

Results: Among 7,939 study participants, 45.8% (95%CI 44.75-46.95) reported willingness to use a Covid-19 self-test. In the analysis of associated factors, regarding sociodemographic profile, non-Black individuals (ORa = 1.17; 95%CI 1.02-1.34), cisgender men (ORa = 1.23; 95%CI 1.12-1.37), and participants with higher educational levels (ORa = 1.60; 95%CI 1.43-1.79) were more likely to accept the self-test. Those with prior knowledge of the self-test (ORa = 2.33; 95%CI 2.11-2.58) and those previously diagnosed with Covid-19 (ORa = 1.17; 95%CI 1.05-1.28) also reported higher acceptance.

Conclusions: Provision of Covid-19 self-testing should be considered as a complement to testing within the public health system, especially due to its acceptance among vulnerable populations and the difficulties in accessing testing in many Brazilian regions. During periods of increased Covid-19 incidence, self-testing may serve as an important strategy for mass case detection, provided that access and knowledge are expanded so communities can play an active role in SARS-CoV-2 epidemiological surveillance.

初级卫生保健使用者对Covid-19自我检测的可接受性
目的:了解影响社会经济弱势群体接受新冠肺炎自我检测的相关因素。方法:利用“TQT Covid-19”项目的数据进行横断面研究,该项目涉及巴西萨尔瓦多(BA)和巴西里约热内卢(RJ)社会经济脆弱地区的19个初级卫生保健(PHC)单位的用户。数据收集于2022年7月至2023年7月。对Covid-19自检可接受性进行描述性分析,并使用逻辑回归模型估计与可接受性相关的因素,分别具有95%可信区间(95% ci)。结果:在7939名研究参与者中,45.8% (95%CI 44.75-46.95)报告愿意使用Covid-19自我检测。在相关因素分析中,在社会人口统计学方面,非黑人个体(ORa = 1.17; 95%CI 1.02-1.34)、顺性男性(ORa = 1.23; 95%CI 1.12-1.37)和受教育程度较高的参与者(ORa = 1.60; 95%CI 1.43-1.79)更容易接受自测。那些事先知道自检的人(ORa = 2.33; 95%CI 2.11-2.58)和之前被诊断为Covid-19的人(ORa = 1.17; 95%CI 1.05-1.28)也报告了更高的接受度。结论:应考虑提供Covid-19自我检测作为公共卫生系统内检测的补充,特别是考虑到弱势人群对其的接受程度以及巴西许多地区难以获得检测。在Covid-19发病率增加期间,自我检测可作为大规模病例发现的一项重要战略,前提是扩大获取途径和知识,使社区能够在SARS-CoV-2流行病学监测中发挥积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de saude publica
Revista de saude publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Saúde Pública has the purpose of publishing original scientific contributions on topics of relevance to public health in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书