Age-Related Differences in Response Time Across Adolescence Reflect Premotor, but Not Motor, Processing Speed.

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
William Slawson, Greg Hajcak, Bob McMurray, Bruce D Bartholow
{"title":"Age-Related Differences in Response Time Across Adolescence Reflect Premotor, but Not Motor, Processing Speed.","authors":"William Slawson, Greg Hajcak, Bob McMurray, Bruce D Bartholow","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extant literature suggests that developmental improvements in processing speed reflect changes in a common global processing factor. In theory, then, the influence of age on processing speed should be shared across premotor processes (e.g., response selection) and motor processes (e.g., response execution). However, some researchers have observed differences in the effect of age on speed across different processes depending on stage of development, and research on neurodevelopment has long demonstrated variation in the developmental trajectory of cortical regions associated with different functions. The current study explored whether age-related differences in processing speed during adolescence varied between premotor and motor domains, testing whether these domain-specific differences accounted for age-related variance in choice reaction time (RT). Adolescent participants (N = 204, 68.6% female) varying in age from 14 to 19 years (M<sub>age</sub> = 16, SD<sub>age</sub> = 1.73) completed a flanker task while EEG was recorded. We quantified the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) to fractionate RTs into premotor (stimulus-locked LRP [S-LRP]) and motor (response-locked LRP [R-LRP]) intervals. Both S-LRP and R-LRP latencies correlated with RT, but only S-LRP latency decreased with age. Mediation analysis confirmed a significant indirect effect of age on RT through S-LRP latency but not R-LRP latency, suggesting that faster processing speed among older adolescents stems from faster premotor-but not motor-processing. We demonstrate the utility of using LRP latencies to investigate domain-specific processing speed, highlighting directions for future work to link structural development research to functional measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"63 5","pages":"e70313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13150053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70313","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extant literature suggests that developmental improvements in processing speed reflect changes in a common global processing factor. In theory, then, the influence of age on processing speed should be shared across premotor processes (e.g., response selection) and motor processes (e.g., response execution). However, some researchers have observed differences in the effect of age on speed across different processes depending on stage of development, and research on neurodevelopment has long demonstrated variation in the developmental trajectory of cortical regions associated with different functions. The current study explored whether age-related differences in processing speed during adolescence varied between premotor and motor domains, testing whether these domain-specific differences accounted for age-related variance in choice reaction time (RT). Adolescent participants (N = 204, 68.6% female) varying in age from 14 to 19 years (Mage = 16, SDage = 1.73) completed a flanker task while EEG was recorded. We quantified the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) to fractionate RTs into premotor (stimulus-locked LRP [S-LRP]) and motor (response-locked LRP [R-LRP]) intervals. Both S-LRP and R-LRP latencies correlated with RT, but only S-LRP latency decreased with age. Mediation analysis confirmed a significant indirect effect of age on RT through S-LRP latency but not R-LRP latency, suggesting that faster processing speed among older adolescents stems from faster premotor-but not motor-processing. We demonstrate the utility of using LRP latencies to investigate domain-specific processing speed, highlighting directions for future work to link structural development research to functional measurements.

青春期反应时间的年龄相关差异反映了运动前的处理速度,而不是运动前的处理速度。
现有文献表明,处理速度的发展改善反映了一个共同的全球处理因素的变化。因此,理论上,年龄对处理速度的影响应该在前运动过程(如反应选择)和运动过程(如反应执行)之间共享。然而,一些研究人员已经观察到年龄对不同发育阶段不同过程速度的影响存在差异,神经发育研究早就证明了与不同功能相关的皮层区域的发育轨迹存在差异。本研究探讨了青春期前运动域和运动域处理速度的年龄相关差异是否存在差异,并检验了这些特定领域的差异是否解释了选择反应时间(RT)的年龄相关差异。年龄在14 - 19岁(年龄在16岁,年龄在1.73岁)的青少年参与者(N = 204, 68.6%为女性)在记录EEG的同时完成了侧卫任务。我们量化了侧化准备电位(LRP),将RTs分为运动前期(刺激锁定LRP [S-LRP])和运动期(反应锁定LRP [R-LRP])。S-LRP和R-LRP潜伏期均与RT相关,但只有S-LRP潜伏期随年龄而降低。中介分析证实了年龄通过S-LRP潜伏期而非R-LRP潜伏期对RT有显著的间接影响,这表明大龄青少年更快的加工速度源于更快的前运动加工,而不是运动加工。我们展示了使用LRP延迟来研究特定领域处理速度的实用性,强调了将结构发展研究与功能测量联系起来的未来工作方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书