The Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass - a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Control Trials.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Caroline Drumm, Matthew G Davey, Shane Moore, Taya Keating, Noel E Donlon
{"title":"The Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass - a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Control Trials.","authors":"Caroline Drumm, Matthew G Davey, Shane Moore, Taya Keating, Noel E Donlon","doi":"10.1007/s11695-026-08711-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used as an element of multimodal analgesia following abdominal surgery; however, its efficacy in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effectiveness of TAP block following RYGB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. RCTs comparing TAP block with control in adult patients undergoing RYGB were included. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores (visual analogues scores (VAS)/numeric rating scale (NRS)) in recovery and at 6, 12, and 24-hours. Data analytics were performed using RevMan v.5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs comprising 481 patients were included. TAP block did not significantly reduce pain scores in recovery, at 6-hours, or at 12-hours postoperatively. A significant reduction in pain was observed at 24-hours (mean difference (MD) -0.57, 95% CI -0.96- -0.17, p = 0.005, I<sup>2</sup> = 92%). Patients receiving TAP block were significantly less likely to require breakthrough opioid analgesia (odds ratio (OR) 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02-0.32, p = 0.0003, I<sup>2</sup> = 51%). TAP block was also associated with earlier ambulation (MD -1.65, 95% CI -2.32- -0.98, p < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). No significant differences were observed in PONV or LOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While TAP block provided limited benefit in early postoperative pain control in patients undergoing RYGB, it was associated with reduced 'breakthrough' opioid requirements, earlier mobilisation, and a significant analgesic effect at 24 h. These findings support the use of TAP blocks as an opioid-sparing adjunct within enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-026-08711-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used as an element of multimodal analgesia following abdominal surgery; however, its efficacy in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains uncertain.

Aim: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effectiveness of TAP block following RYGB.

Methods: A comprehensive search was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. RCTs comparing TAP block with control in adult patients undergoing RYGB were included. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores (visual analogues scores (VAS)/numeric rating scale (NRS)) in recovery and at 6, 12, and 24-hours. Data analytics were performed using RevMan v.5.3.

Results: Five RCTs comprising 481 patients were included. TAP block did not significantly reduce pain scores in recovery, at 6-hours, or at 12-hours postoperatively. A significant reduction in pain was observed at 24-hours (mean difference (MD) -0.57, 95% CI -0.96- -0.17, p = 0.005, I2 = 92%). Patients receiving TAP block were significantly less likely to require breakthrough opioid analgesia (odds ratio (OR) 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02-0.32, p = 0.0003, I2 = 51%). TAP block was also associated with earlier ambulation (MD -1.65, 95% CI -2.32- -0.98, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). No significant differences were observed in PONV or LOS.

Conclusion: While TAP block provided limited benefit in early postoperative pain control in patients undergoing RYGB, it was associated with reduced 'breakthrough' opioid requirements, earlier mobilisation, and a significant analgesic effect at 24 h. These findings support the use of TAP blocks as an opioid-sparing adjunct within enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery pathways.

经腹平面阻滞在Roux-en-Y胃旁路术中的疗效——随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
背景:腹横平面(TAP)阻滞通常被用作腹部手术后多模式镇痛的一个组成部分;然而,其在Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)中的疗效仍不确定。目的:对随机临床试验(rct)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估RYGB后TAP阻断的有效性。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行全面检索。在接受RYGB的成人患者中,比较TAP阻滞与对照组的随机对照试验被纳入。主要结局是术后疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分(VAS)/数值评定量表(NRS))在恢复和6、12和24小时。使用RevMan v.5.3进行数据分析。结果:纳入5项随机对照试验,共481例患者。术后6小时和12小时,TAP阻滞均未显著降低疼痛评分。24小时疼痛明显减轻(平均差异(MD) -0.57, 95% CI -0.96- -0.17, p = 0.005, I2 = 92%)。接受TAP阻断的患者需要突破性阿片类镇痛的可能性显著降低(优势比(OR) 0.09, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.02 ~ 0.32, p = 0.0003, I2 = 51%)。TAP阻滞也与早期活动相关(MD -1.65, 95% CI -2.32- 0.98, p 2 = 0%)。PONV和LOS无显著差异。结论:尽管TAP阻滞对RYGB患者术后早期疼痛控制的益处有限,但它与减少“突破性”阿片类药物需求、早期活动和24小时内显著的镇痛效果有关。这些发现支持TAP阻滞作为一种阿片类药物节约辅助药物在减肥手术途径后增强恢复中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书