Sumit Sharma, Dilsher S Dhoot, Dilraj S Grewal, Eric Jung, Fabiana Q Silva, Weiming Du, Hadi Moini, David S Boyer
{"title":"Effects of Time From Diagnosis to Treatment and Baseline Vision on Retinal Vein Occlusion Outcomes in Aflibercept 2 mg Phase 3 Trials.","authors":"Sumit Sharma, Dilsher S Dhoot, Dilraj S Grewal, Eric Jung, Fabiana Q Silva, Weiming Du, Hadi Moini, David S Boyer","doi":"10.1016/j.oret.2026.04.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine impacts of time since diagnosis of macular edema following central or branch retinal vein occlusion (MEfCRVO or MEfBRVO) to first intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg injection (IAI) and baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) on visual and anatomic outcomes, to inform treatment decisions and management of physician and patient expectations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Post hoc analysis of 3 clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with MEfCRVO from COPERNICUS and GALILEO treated with IAI every 4 weeks then as needed from Week 24 to 100 (COPERNICUS) or 76 (GALILEO) and patients with MEfBRVO from VIBRANT treated with IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks then every 8 weeks from Week 24 to 52.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were grouped by time from initial MEfCRVO/MEfBRVO diagnosis to first IAI, < 1, 1-3, or > 3 months (COPERNICUS/GALILEO), and < 1 or ≥ 1 month (VIBRANT).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Impact of baseline BCVA was evaluated by tertiles: T1, ≤ 44; T2, > 44-≤ 58; T3, > 58 letters (COPERNICUS), T1, ≤ 47; T2, > 47-≤ 65; T3, > 65 letters (GALILEO), and T1, ≤ 55; T2, > 55-≤ 64; T3, > 64 letters (VIBRANT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In COPERNICUS, 113 patients initiated IAI at < 1 (n = 44; 38.9%), 1-3 (n = 33; 29.2%), or > 3 months (n = 36; 31.9%) post-diagnosis; mean BCVA gains from baseline at Week 24 were 19.8, 15.6, and 11.9 letters, respectively (mean [95% CI] difference between < 1-month and > 3-month groups: +7.9 [1.7, 14.1]; P = 0.01). Central retinal thickness (CRT) decrease from baseline at Week 24 across time-since-diagnosis subgroups was -466.6, -456.4, and -479.2 μm, respectively. Least squares mean BCVA gains from baseline at Week 100 were greater for baseline BCVA T1 versus T2/T3 (16.5 vs 8.9/5.9 letters) but final BCVA was lower (49.8 vs 60.9/71.2 letters, respectively). CRT at Week 100 was similar across T1-T3 (243.8-291.5 μm, respectively). Outcomes were similar in GALILEO and VIBRANT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In MEfCRVO/MEfBRVO, longer time to IAI treatment initiation was followed by less visual improvement. Poor baseline BCVA was associated with greater visual improvement but worse final BCVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19501,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Retina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2026.04.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To examine impacts of time since diagnosis of macular edema following central or branch retinal vein occlusion (MEfCRVO or MEfBRVO) to first intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg injection (IAI) and baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) on visual and anatomic outcomes, to inform treatment decisions and management of physician and patient expectations.
Design: Post hoc analysis of 3 clinical trials.
Participants: Patients with MEfCRVO from COPERNICUS and GALILEO treated with IAI every 4 weeks then as needed from Week 24 to 100 (COPERNICUS) or 76 (GALILEO) and patients with MEfBRVO from VIBRANT treated with IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks then every 8 weeks from Week 24 to 52.
Methods: Patients were grouped by time from initial MEfCRVO/MEfBRVO diagnosis to first IAI, < 1, 1-3, or > 3 months (COPERNICUS/GALILEO), and < 1 or ≥ 1 month (VIBRANT).
Main outcome measures: Impact of baseline BCVA was evaluated by tertiles: T1, ≤ 44; T2, > 44-≤ 58; T3, > 58 letters (COPERNICUS), T1, ≤ 47; T2, > 47-≤ 65; T3, > 65 letters (GALILEO), and T1, ≤ 55; T2, > 55-≤ 64; T3, > 64 letters (VIBRANT).
Results: In COPERNICUS, 113 patients initiated IAI at < 1 (n = 44; 38.9%), 1-3 (n = 33; 29.2%), or > 3 months (n = 36; 31.9%) post-diagnosis; mean BCVA gains from baseline at Week 24 were 19.8, 15.6, and 11.9 letters, respectively (mean [95% CI] difference between < 1-month and > 3-month groups: +7.9 [1.7, 14.1]; P = 0.01). Central retinal thickness (CRT) decrease from baseline at Week 24 across time-since-diagnosis subgroups was -466.6, -456.4, and -479.2 μm, respectively. Least squares mean BCVA gains from baseline at Week 100 were greater for baseline BCVA T1 versus T2/T3 (16.5 vs 8.9/5.9 letters) but final BCVA was lower (49.8 vs 60.9/71.2 letters, respectively). CRT at Week 100 was similar across T1-T3 (243.8-291.5 μm, respectively). Outcomes were similar in GALILEO and VIBRANT.
Conclusion: In MEfCRVO/MEfBRVO, longer time to IAI treatment initiation was followed by less visual improvement. Poor baseline BCVA was associated with greater visual improvement but worse final BCVA.