The Role of Regulatory Policies in Shaping Outpatient Cancer Treatment in Germany: A Comparative Perspective.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Julia Heinen, Max Kraemer, Florian Kron, Michael Hallek
{"title":"The Role of Regulatory Policies in Shaping Outpatient Cancer Treatment in Germany: A Comparative Perspective.","authors":"Julia Heinen, Max Kraemer, Florian Kron, Michael Hallek","doi":"10.1159/000552372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The German healthcare system has traditionally separated sectors for inpatient and outpatient care. Recently, outpatient care was increasingly integrated into hospital settings, in particular for cancer patients. This transition has been gradual, leading to inconsistencies in coordination, quality assurance and reimbursement. This study compares how different reimbursement frameworks impact outpatient care for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma at the University Hospital of Cologne (UHC) and its affiliated medical service center (Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum, MVZ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis (2018-2021) was conducted using clinical and billing data of the outpatient unit of the Department I of Internal Medicine (Dept I) and the MVZ. Patients with DLBCL or stage IV EGJ adenocarcinoma receiving first-line therapy were included. Adherence to S3 guideline-based reference care pathways was assessed alongside additional service provision. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests and regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: Among 93 eligible patients (DLBCL, n=65; EGJ, n=28), DLBCL patients treated at the Dept I showed significantly higher adherence to standard procedures during primary staging and pre-therapeutic assessments compared to the MVZ (p < 0.01). The Dept I more frequently delegated routine tasks to general practitioners during chemotherapy cycles 4-6 (p < 0.01) and provided more additional medical consultations during treatment (p < 0.01). In contrast, the MVZ used multiday chemotherapy schedules more frequently than the Dept I (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed for EGJ patients. Overall, both settings maintained equal levels of guideline-compliant care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regulatory frameworks did not impact overall service volume but influenced certain aspects of care delivery. The outpatient unit of the Dept I adopted a more integrated, service-oriented approach, while the MVZ emphasized operational efficiency. Overall, the findings show that reimbursement schedules influence the operational standards of cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000552372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The German healthcare system has traditionally separated sectors for inpatient and outpatient care. Recently, outpatient care was increasingly integrated into hospital settings, in particular for cancer patients. This transition has been gradual, leading to inconsistencies in coordination, quality assurance and reimbursement. This study compares how different reimbursement frameworks impact outpatient care for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma at the University Hospital of Cologne (UHC) and its affiliated medical service center (Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum, MVZ).

Methods: A retrospective analysis (2018-2021) was conducted using clinical and billing data of the outpatient unit of the Department I of Internal Medicine (Dept I) and the MVZ. Patients with DLBCL or stage IV EGJ adenocarcinoma receiving first-line therapy were included. Adherence to S3 guideline-based reference care pathways was assessed alongside additional service provision. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests and regression models.

Results: Results: Among 93 eligible patients (DLBCL, n=65; EGJ, n=28), DLBCL patients treated at the Dept I showed significantly higher adherence to standard procedures during primary staging and pre-therapeutic assessments compared to the MVZ (p < 0.01). The Dept I more frequently delegated routine tasks to general practitioners during chemotherapy cycles 4-6 (p < 0.01) and provided more additional medical consultations during treatment (p < 0.01). In contrast, the MVZ used multiday chemotherapy schedules more frequently than the Dept I (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed for EGJ patients. Overall, both settings maintained equal levels of guideline-compliant care.

Conclusion: Regulatory frameworks did not impact overall service volume but influenced certain aspects of care delivery. The outpatient unit of the Dept I adopted a more integrated, service-oriented approach, while the MVZ emphasized operational efficiency. Overall, the findings show that reimbursement schedules influence the operational standards of cancer care.

监管政策在塑造德国门诊癌症治疗中的作用:一个比较的视角。
简介:德国医疗保健系统传统上有住院和门诊分开的部门。最近,门诊护理越来越多地纳入医院环境,特别是对癌症患者。这种过渡是渐进的,导致协调、质量保证和偿还方面的不一致。本研究比较了不同报销框架对科隆大学医院(UHC)及其附属医疗服务中心(Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum, MVZ)弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)和食管胃交界(EGJ)腺癌患者门诊护理的影响。方法:回顾性分析2018-2021年内科一科门诊部和MVZ的临床和计费数据。包括接受一线治疗的DLBCL或IV期EGJ腺癌患者。对基于S3指南的参考护理途径的依从性进行评估,同时提供额外的服务。统计分析包括Mann-Whitney U检验和回归模型。结果:在93例符合条件的患者(DLBCL, n=65; EGJ, n=28)中,与MVZ相比,在I部治疗的DLBCL患者在初级分期和治疗前评估中对标准程序的依从性明显更高(p < 0.01)。在化疗4-6周期,I科更频繁地将常规任务委托给全科医生(p < 0.01),并在治疗期间提供更多的额外医疗咨询(p < 0.01)。相比之下,MVZ使用多天化疗方案的频率高于I部(p < 0.05)。EGJ患者无显著性差异。总的来说,两种设置都保持了相同水平的指南依从性护理。结论:监管框架不会影响总体服务量,但会影响医疗服务的某些方面。第一科的门诊部采用了更加综合的、面向服务的方法,而MVZ则强调业务效率。总的来说,研究结果表明,报销计划影响了癌症治疗的操作标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书