The Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) and non-instrumental swallowing measures in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sergio Motta, Giuseppe Quaremba, Lucia Aruta, Salvatore Allosso, Gianmaria Senerchia, Valentina Virginia Iuzzolino, Raffaele Dubbioso
{"title":"The Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) and non-instrumental swallowing measures in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.","authors":"Sergio Motta, Giuseppe Quaremba, Lucia Aruta, Salvatore Allosso, Gianmaria Senerchia, Valentina Virginia Iuzzolino, Raffaele Dubbioso","doi":"10.1007/s10072-026-09076-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate reliability of the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients, and to assess diagnostic accuracy of selected non-instrumental measures in defining swallowing safety in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and thirteen consecutive ALS patients underwent comprehensive dysphagia evaluation with fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and were classified according to DOSS. Safe and unsafe swallowing were defined by DOSS levels 7-6 and 5-1, respectively. Patient-reported measures included ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised swallow item (I-3) and Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10). Non-instrumental clinical measures were hyolaryngeal excursion, voluntary cough (VC), voice quality and reflexive cough/throat clearing (VRC), and maximum phonation time (MPT). Inter- and intra-rater reliability were assessed using weighted Cohen's kappa and Fleiss' kappa coefficients. Non-instrumental measures diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six of 113 patients (23%) exhibited an unsafe swallowing. Inter- and intra-rater agreement for DOSS classification was excellent across raters. EAT-10 and a composite clinical index derived from VC, VRC, and MPT showed the highest diagnostic accuracy with area under the curve values of 0.790 and 0.832, respectively. Other non-instrumental measures demonstrated lower discriminative performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DOSS showed an excellent reliability when applied to FEES in patients with ALS, supporting its use as a functional classification tool with direct nutritional and management implications. Non-instrumental measures should be interpreted with caution and confined to a triage role rather than diagnostic decision-making, particularly in light of the rapid progression of dysphagia in ALS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":"47 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13149588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-026-09076-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate reliability of the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients, and to assess diagnostic accuracy of selected non-instrumental measures in defining swallowing safety in this population.

Methods: One hundred and thirteen consecutive ALS patients underwent comprehensive dysphagia evaluation with fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and were classified according to DOSS. Safe and unsafe swallowing were defined by DOSS levels 7-6 and 5-1, respectively. Patient-reported measures included ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised swallow item (I-3) and Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10). Non-instrumental clinical measures were hyolaryngeal excursion, voluntary cough (VC), voice quality and reflexive cough/throat clearing (VRC), and maximum phonation time (MPT). Inter- and intra-rater reliability were assessed using weighted Cohen's kappa and Fleiss' kappa coefficients. Non-instrumental measures diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: Twenty-six of 113 patients (23%) exhibited an unsafe swallowing. Inter- and intra-rater agreement for DOSS classification was excellent across raters. EAT-10 and a composite clinical index derived from VC, VRC, and MPT showed the highest diagnostic accuracy with area under the curve values of 0.790 and 0.832, respectively. Other non-instrumental measures demonstrated lower discriminative performance.

Conclusions: The DOSS showed an excellent reliability when applied to FEES in patients with ALS, supporting its use as a functional classification tool with direct nutritional and management implications. Non-instrumental measures should be interpreted with caution and confined to a triage role rather than diagnostic decision-making, particularly in light of the rapid progression of dysphagia in ALS.

肌萎缩性侧索硬化症患者的吞咽困难结局和严重程度量表(DOSS)和非器械吞咽测量。
目的:评估肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)患者吞咽困难结局和严重程度量表(DOSS)的可靠性,并评估该人群中确定吞咽安全性的选定非工具测量的诊断准确性。方法:连续113例ALS患者行纤维内镜吞咽评估(FEES)综合吞咽困难评估,并按DOSS进行分类。安全吞咽和不安全吞咽分别按DOSS等级7-6和5-1进行定义。患者报告的测量包括ALS功能评定量表-修订吞咽项目(I-3)和进食评估工具-10 (EAT-10)。非器质性临床指标包括:喉偏移、自主咳嗽(VC)、音质和反射性咳嗽/清喉(VRC)、最大发声时间(MPT)。使用加权的Cohen’s kappa和Fleiss’s kappa系数评估评级间和评级内的信度。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评价非仪器测量诊断效果。结果:113例患者中有26例(23%)出现不安全吞咽。评分者之间和评分者内部对DOSS分类的一致性非常好。EAT-10和VC、VRC、MPT综合临床指标诊断准确率最高,曲线下面积分别为0.790和0.832。其他非工具测量显示较低的判别性能。结论:将DOSS应用于ALS患者的FEES时显示出极好的可靠性,支持其作为具有直接营养和管理意义的功能分类工具。非仪器测量应谨慎解释,仅限于分诊作用,而不是诊断决策,特别是考虑到ALS患者吞咽困难的快速进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书