Low-frequency rTMS in combination with nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: a phase II non-comparative Fleming-type randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Anastasia Demina, Benjamin Petit, Agnès Soudry-Faure, Karine Goueslard, Benoit Trojak
{"title":"Low-frequency rTMS in combination with nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: a phase II non-comparative Fleming-type randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.","authors":"Anastasia Demina, Benjamin Petit, Agnès Soudry-Faure, Karine Goueslard, Benoit Trojak","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntag097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Innovative interventions such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may hold promise for individuals seeking smoking cessation support. In this Phase II pilot trial, we explored the potential of low-frequency rTMS (1 Hz) combined with nicotine replacement therapy to contribute to sustained tobacco abstinence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-comparative single-step Fleming-type Phase II randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled design was used to test the eligibility of active rTMS for a Phase III trial. The primary outcome was biochemically confirmed Continuous Abstinence Rate (CAR) at six weeks post-randomization in the active rTMS group. Secondary outcomes included 12-week and 12-month CAR, craving, mood and safety evaluations in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>78 participants were randomized to the active (n=39) or sham rTMS group (n=39). All participants received nicotine replacement therapy. In the active rTMS group, at 6-week follow-up, 16 patients (41%) were abstinent versus 18 patients (46%) in the sham rTMS group. At the 12-week and 12-month follow-up assessments, abstinence rates declined in both groups, with 26% and 15% of participants maintaining abstinence in the active rTMS group, compared with 15% and 10% in the sham group, respectively. Craving scores decreased in both groups, and mood scores were equally distributed. Eleven mild-to-moderate adverse events were reported in the active group versus twenty-three in the sham group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given our definition of treatment efficacy, active low-frequency rTMS can be considered effective and eligible for a phase III trial. However, this result requires careful consideration since the sham rTMS group exhibited similar outcomes. The remaining uncertainty suggests a need for further research, particularly to assess nicotine's influence on cortical excitability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntag097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Innovative interventions such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may hold promise for individuals seeking smoking cessation support. In this Phase II pilot trial, we explored the potential of low-frequency rTMS (1 Hz) combined with nicotine replacement therapy to contribute to sustained tobacco abstinence.

Methods: A non-comparative single-step Fleming-type Phase II randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled design was used to test the eligibility of active rTMS for a Phase III trial. The primary outcome was biochemically confirmed Continuous Abstinence Rate (CAR) at six weeks post-randomization in the active rTMS group. Secondary outcomes included 12-week and 12-month CAR, craving, mood and safety evaluations in both groups.

Results: 78 participants were randomized to the active (n=39) or sham rTMS group (n=39). All participants received nicotine replacement therapy. In the active rTMS group, at 6-week follow-up, 16 patients (41%) were abstinent versus 18 patients (46%) in the sham rTMS group. At the 12-week and 12-month follow-up assessments, abstinence rates declined in both groups, with 26% and 15% of participants maintaining abstinence in the active rTMS group, compared with 15% and 10% in the sham group, respectively. Craving scores decreased in both groups, and mood scores were equally distributed. Eleven mild-to-moderate adverse events were reported in the active group versus twenty-three in the sham group.

Conclusion: Given our definition of treatment efficacy, active low-frequency rTMS can be considered effective and eligible for a phase III trial. However, this result requires careful consideration since the sham rTMS group exhibited similar outcomes. The remaining uncertainty suggests a need for further research, particularly to assess nicotine's influence on cortical excitability.

低频rTMS联合尼古丁替代疗法戒烟:一项II期非比较弗莱明型随机、双盲、假对照试验。
引言:创新的干预措施,如重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)可能为寻求戒烟支持的个人带来希望。在这项II期试点试验中,我们探索了低频rTMS (1hz)联合尼古丁替代疗法对持续戒烟的潜力。方法:采用非比较性单步弗莱明II期随机、双盲、假对照设计来检验主动rTMS在III期试验中的适用性。主要终点是随机化后活性rTMS组6周生化确认的持续戒断率(CAR)。次要结果包括两组12周和12个月的CAR、渴望、情绪和安全性评估。结果:78名参与者被随机分为活跃组(n=39)和假rTMS组(n=39)。所有参与者都接受尼古丁替代疗法。在主动rTMS组中,在6周的随访中,16名患者(41%)戒断,而假rTMS组中有18名患者(46%)戒断。在12周和12个月的随访评估中,两组的戒断率都有所下降,活跃rTMS组中有26%和15%的参与者保持戒断,而假手术组分别为15%和10%。两组的渴望得分都有所下降,情绪得分分布均匀。活跃组报告了11例轻中度不良事件,而假药组报告了23例。结论:根据我们对治疗疗效的定义,主动低频rTMS可以被认为是有效的,符合III期试验的条件。然而,这个结果需要仔细考虑,因为假rTMS组表现出类似的结果。剩余的不确定性表明需要进一步的研究,特别是评估尼古丁对皮质兴奋性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书