Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Representation in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Global Perspective on Workforce Disparities and Patient Care Implications.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Dua Rana, Hussain Haider Shah, Ayesha Khan, Sakshi Chawla, Rabbey Khan, Bishoy Fahim, Sarrah Ali Asghar, Saloni Mitra, Muskan Seher, L V Simhachalam Kutikuppala, Helen Huang
{"title":"Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Representation in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Global Perspective on Workforce Disparities and Patient Care Implications.","authors":"Dua Rana, Hussain Haider Shah, Ayesha Khan, Sakshi Chawla, Rabbey Khan, Bishoy Fahim, Sarrah Ali Asghar, Saloni Mitra, Muskan Seher, L V Simhachalam Kutikuppala, Helen Huang","doi":"10.1007/s40615-026-03004-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-quality care in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) is closely linked to patient satisfaction. However, disparities in care delivery based on patient demographics, including gender, race, and ethnicity, have been documented in the literature. As healthcare institutions strive to improve the quality of care provided to their patients, diversity among gynaecologists is emerging as essential to achieving this goal. Increasing diversity among gynaecologists can lead to better representation of diverse patient populations and improved patient-physician concordance, resulting in higher patient satisfaction. Available evidence shows that there are high levels of disparity in workforce in the field of OBGYN. An example can be provided with women in the United States who make up about 57% of the OBGYN physicians and yet their representation in leadership positions remain lower than expected. Likewise, the ratio of racial representation is not balanced, as about 68% of the OBGYN physicians are White and only 8 and 5% are Black and Hispanic physicians respectively. Moreover, research has found that there is almost a 21% gender pay gap even with the workload and volume of procedures. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of key gender, racial, and ethnic disparities that exist in OBGYN care in developed countries, particularly the United States, highlighting the need for further research in developing regions. We highlight the importance of reducing and monitoring these disparities through quality metrics to promote better clinical practice and physician well-being. Our review provides valuable insight for healthcare institutions and policymakers to promote physician representation, enhance patient-physician experiences, and improve patient outcomes in OBGYN practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-026-03004-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-quality care in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) is closely linked to patient satisfaction. However, disparities in care delivery based on patient demographics, including gender, race, and ethnicity, have been documented in the literature. As healthcare institutions strive to improve the quality of care provided to their patients, diversity among gynaecologists is emerging as essential to achieving this goal. Increasing diversity among gynaecologists can lead to better representation of diverse patient populations and improved patient-physician concordance, resulting in higher patient satisfaction. Available evidence shows that there are high levels of disparity in workforce in the field of OBGYN. An example can be provided with women in the United States who make up about 57% of the OBGYN physicians and yet their representation in leadership positions remain lower than expected. Likewise, the ratio of racial representation is not balanced, as about 68% of the OBGYN physicians are White and only 8 and 5% are Black and Hispanic physicians respectively. Moreover, research has found that there is almost a 21% gender pay gap even with the workload and volume of procedures. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of key gender, racial, and ethnic disparities that exist in OBGYN care in developed countries, particularly the United States, highlighting the need for further research in developing regions. We highlight the importance of reducing and monitoring these disparities through quality metrics to promote better clinical practice and physician well-being. Our review provides valuable insight for healthcare institutions and policymakers to promote physician representation, enhance patient-physician experiences, and improve patient outcomes in OBGYN practice.

妇产科的种族、民族和性别代表:劳动力差异和患者护理影响的全球视角。
产科和妇科(OBGYN)的高质量护理与患者满意度密切相关。然而,基于患者人口统计数据(包括性别、种族和民族)的护理服务差异已被文献记载。随着保健机构努力提高向患者提供的护理质量,妇科医生的多样性正在成为实现这一目标的关键。增加妇科医生的多样性可以更好地代表不同的患者群体,改善患者-医生的一致性,从而提高患者满意度。现有证据表明,在妇产科领域存在着很大程度的劳动力差距。以美国的女性为例,她们占妇产科医生的57%,但她们在领导职位上的比例仍然低于预期。同样,种族代表的比例也不平衡,大约68%的妇产科医生是白人,黑人和西班牙裔医生分别只有8%和5%。此外,研究发现,即使在工作量和程序数量方面,性别收入差距也接近21%。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们概述了发达国家(特别是美国)妇产科护理中存在的主要性别、种族和民族差异,并强调了发展中地区进一步研究的必要性。我们强调通过质量指标减少和监测这些差异的重要性,以促进更好的临床实践和医生福祉。我们的综述为医疗机构和政策制定者提供了有价值的见解,以促进医生的代表性,增强患者与医生的经验,并改善妇产科实践中的患者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书