Association of Acute Ischemic Stroke Volume With Post-Stroke Epilepsy Development.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vijaya Dasari, Kunio Nakamura, Bhaskar Thoomukuntla, Nicolas Thompson, Shumei Man, Ken Uchino, Andrew Russman, M Shazam Hussain, Vineet Punia
{"title":"Association of Acute Ischemic Stroke Volume With Post-Stroke Epilepsy Development.","authors":"Vijaya Dasari, Kunio Nakamura, Bhaskar Thoomukuntla, Nicolas Thompson, Shumei Man, Ken Uchino, Andrew Russman, M Shazam Hussain, Vineet Punia","doi":"10.1111/jon.70134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Stroke is a leading cause of epilepsy, especially in older adults. The SeLECT score remains the standard among post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) prediction tools. However, its broader validation is limited by the need to manually extract neuroimaging predictors (cortical and middle cerebral artery [MCA] involvement). Unlike the CAVE score, SeLECT did not evaluate acute stroke volume, which can now be quantified automatically. We aimed to determine whether stroke volume independently predicts PSE and compare its predictive contribution to SeLECT's neuroimaging variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SeLECT variables were manually extracted. Diffusion-weighted imaging volume was quantified using a validated convolutional neural network. Cox proportional hazards models for time to PSE were built by adding stroke volume (per 10 mL) and then removing cortical and/or MCA involvement. For each model, we analyzed variable significance, discrimination, and calibration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 221 patients, 35 (15.8%) developed PSE. In our cohort, the original SeLECT score and the refit model had a C-index of 0.669 and 0.642, respectively. Adding stroke volume resulted in a C-index of 0.656. Retaining volume while removing cortical and MCA involvement resulted in C-indices of 0.664 and 0.668, respectively. Keeping stroke volume and removing both variables increased the C-index to 0.679. Calibration was good for all models. Stroke volume in crease by 10 mL was an independent predictor of 12% increased PSE risk across all models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acute stroke volume is an independent PSE predictor. Stroke volume offered comparable discrimination to the neuroimaging components of the SeLECT score, supporting its use as a scalable and automated alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":16399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroimaging","volume":"36 3","pages":"e70134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13145306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.70134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Stroke is a leading cause of epilepsy, especially in older adults. The SeLECT score remains the standard among post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) prediction tools. However, its broader validation is limited by the need to manually extract neuroimaging predictors (cortical and middle cerebral artery [MCA] involvement). Unlike the CAVE score, SeLECT did not evaluate acute stroke volume, which can now be quantified automatically. We aimed to determine whether stroke volume independently predicts PSE and compare its predictive contribution to SeLECT's neuroimaging variables.

Methods: SeLECT variables were manually extracted. Diffusion-weighted imaging volume was quantified using a validated convolutional neural network. Cox proportional hazards models for time to PSE were built by adding stroke volume (per 10 mL) and then removing cortical and/or MCA involvement. For each model, we analyzed variable significance, discrimination, and calibration.

Results: Among 221 patients, 35 (15.8%) developed PSE. In our cohort, the original SeLECT score and the refit model had a C-index of 0.669 and 0.642, respectively. Adding stroke volume resulted in a C-index of 0.656. Retaining volume while removing cortical and MCA involvement resulted in C-indices of 0.664 and 0.668, respectively. Keeping stroke volume and removing both variables increased the C-index to 0.679. Calibration was good for all models. Stroke volume in crease by 10 mL was an independent predictor of 12% increased PSE risk across all models.

Conclusions: Acute stroke volume is an independent PSE predictor. Stroke volume offered comparable discrimination to the neuroimaging components of the SeLECT score, supporting its use as a scalable and automated alternative.

急性缺血性卒中容量与卒中后癫痫发展的关系。
背景和目的:中风是癫痫的主要原因,尤其是在老年人中。SeLECT评分仍然是卒中后癫痫(PSE)预测工具的标准。然而,其更广泛的验证受到人工提取神经影像学预测因子(大脑皮层和大脑中动脉[MCA]受累)的限制。与CAVE评分不同,SeLECT不评估急性卒中容量,现在可以自动量化。我们的目的是确定脑卒中容量是否能独立预测PSE,并比较其对SeLECT神经影像学变量的预测贡献。方法:人工提取部分变量。使用经过验证的卷积神经网络对扩散加权成像体积进行量化。通过增加脑卒中容量(每10 mL),然后去除皮层和/或MCA受累,建立到PSE时间的Cox比例风险模型。对于每个模型,我们分析了变量显著性、判别和校准。结果:221例患者中有35例(15.8%)发生PSE。在我们的队列中,原始SeLECT得分和修正模型的c指数分别为0.669和0.642。增加冲程体积,c指数为0.656。保留体积同时去除皮质和MCA受累导致c指数分别为0.664和0.668。保持笔划量并去除这两个变量使c -指数增加到0.679。所有模型的校准都很好。在所有模型中,卒中容量增加10ml是PSE风险增加12%的独立预测因子。结论:急性脑卒中容量是一个独立的PSE预测指标。脑卒中量与SeLECT评分的神经成像成分具有可比性,支持其作为可扩展和自动化替代方案的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroimaging
Journal of Neuroimaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Start reading the Journal of Neuroimaging to learn the latest neurological imaging techniques. The peer-reviewed research is written in a practical clinical context, giving you the information you need on: MRI CT Carotid Ultrasound and TCD SPECT PET Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology Functional MRI Xenon CT and other new and upcoming neuroscientific modalities.The Journal of Neuroimaging addresses the full spectrum of human nervous system disease, including stroke, neoplasia, degenerating and demyelinating disease, epilepsy, tumors, lesions, infectious disease, cerebral vascular arterial diseases, toxic-metabolic disease, psychoses, dementias, heredo-familial disease, and trauma.Offering original research, review articles, case reports, neuroimaging CPCs, and evaluations of instruments and technology relevant to the nervous system, the Journal of Neuroimaging focuses on useful clinical developments and applications, tested techniques and interpretations, patient care, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Start reading today!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书