{"title":"Flow Control When Testing Dry-Powder Inhalers.","authors":"Daryl L Roberts","doi":"10.1177/19412711261448446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International compendia specify setting the flow for testing dry powder inhalers (DPIs) with the pressure ratio across the flow control valve ≤0.5. This guidance derives from thermodynamic theory, but there is no requirement that the flow control equipment demonstrates adherence to this theory. There is therefore a need to define and test for acceptable flow control valve performance, enabling DPI manufacturers to determine whether their test equipment is achieving the expected flow control. Herein, we present flow control data for two valves common in the inhaler testing community and describe the need for qualification specifications for flow control equipment with such valves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We devised a simple laboratory apparatus and method for determining the mass flow rate through two common flow control valves in their commercial configuration. In the test method, the pressure ratio across the valve is lowered from ∼0.7 to 0.3. This range of pressure ratio covers the standard test requirement that the pressure ratio must be 0.5 or less and maps the transition of compressible flow through the valve to the point where the air flow theoretically remains constant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A common industrial valve, mentioned specifically in Pharm. Eur. 2.9.18 and in earlier editions of United States Pharmacopeia 601, exhibits nearly constant flow when the pressure ratio is <0.5. Another valve in widespread use exhibits a continued slight increase in mass flow rate even as the pressure ratio is decreased below 0.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inhaler testing laboratories should test whether their equipment exhibits the constant flow condition that is often assumed when the pressure ratio across the flow control valve is 0.5 or smaller. Quantitative specifications, yet to be developed, for qualifying commercial flow control equipment must account for both the transient start-up and the steady-state flow in DPI testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":"228-235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711261448446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: International compendia specify setting the flow for testing dry powder inhalers (DPIs) with the pressure ratio across the flow control valve ≤0.5. This guidance derives from thermodynamic theory, but there is no requirement that the flow control equipment demonstrates adherence to this theory. There is therefore a need to define and test for acceptable flow control valve performance, enabling DPI manufacturers to determine whether their test equipment is achieving the expected flow control. Herein, we present flow control data for two valves common in the inhaler testing community and describe the need for qualification specifications for flow control equipment with such valves.
Methods: We devised a simple laboratory apparatus and method for determining the mass flow rate through two common flow control valves in their commercial configuration. In the test method, the pressure ratio across the valve is lowered from ∼0.7 to 0.3. This range of pressure ratio covers the standard test requirement that the pressure ratio must be 0.5 or less and maps the transition of compressible flow through the valve to the point where the air flow theoretically remains constant.
Results: A common industrial valve, mentioned specifically in Pharm. Eur. 2.9.18 and in earlier editions of United States Pharmacopeia 601, exhibits nearly constant flow when the pressure ratio is <0.5. Another valve in widespread use exhibits a continued slight increase in mass flow rate even as the pressure ratio is decreased below 0.5.
Conclusions: Inhaler testing laboratories should test whether their equipment exhibits the constant flow condition that is often assumed when the pressure ratio across the flow control valve is 0.5 or smaller. Quantitative specifications, yet to be developed, for qualifying commercial flow control equipment must account for both the transient start-up and the steady-state flow in DPI testing.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient.
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes:
Pulmonary drug delivery
Airway reactivity and asthma treatment
Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract
Toxic effects of inhaled agents
Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.