Safety of resident performed surgeries in complex cataract cases and comparative analysis with staff surgeons: a review of 1500 consecutive cases.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Gozde Derin Sengun, Ebubekir Durmus, Veysel Aykut, Halit Oguz, Fehim Esen
{"title":"Safety of resident performed surgeries in complex cataract cases and comparative analysis with staff surgeons: a review of 1500 consecutive cases.","authors":"Gozde Derin Sengun, Ebubekir Durmus, Veysel Aykut, Halit Oguz, Fehim Esen","doi":"10.1007/s10792-026-04094-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the intraoperative complication rates and incidence of postoperative day 1 (POD1) intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation in primary phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed by residents and staff surgeons in a teaching hospital and determine the risk factors associated with posterior capsule tear (PCT) and POD1 IOP elevation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all cases of primary phacoemulsification in patients aged 18 years or older, performed by residents and staff surgeons from May 27, 2022, to May 31, 2023 in a tertiary eyecare center in Turkey. There were no exclusion criteria. Data collected included primary surgeon, level of experience, preoperative status of cases, intraoperative complications, other operative details and POD1 IOP measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1500 surgeries were included; 68.8% were performed by residents. Overall intraoperative complication rates were similar in groups in simple and complex cases. There was no statistically significant difference in PCT rates between groups in simple (2.4% and 1.9%, p = 0.800) and complex cases (3.7% and 5.1%, p = 0.455). Rate of POD1 IOP elevation above 25 mm Hg was also similar in groups (22.7% and 22.6%, p = 0.903). Pseudoexfoliation + small pupil and special cataracts were significant risk factors for PCT among residents (p = 0.048 and p = 0.033, respectively). Pseudoexfoliation + small pupil, glaucoma or ocular hypertension and uveitis were significant risk factors for POD1 IOP elevation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall intraoperative complication and PCT rates were comparable between residents and staff surgeons in both simple and complex cases. Resident involvement was not a risk factor for POD1 IOP elevation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-026-04094-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the intraoperative complication rates and incidence of postoperative day 1 (POD1) intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation in primary phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed by residents and staff surgeons in a teaching hospital and determine the risk factors associated with posterior capsule tear (PCT) and POD1 IOP elevation.

Methods: This retrospective study included all cases of primary phacoemulsification in patients aged 18 years or older, performed by residents and staff surgeons from May 27, 2022, to May 31, 2023 in a tertiary eyecare center in Turkey. There were no exclusion criteria. Data collected included primary surgeon, level of experience, preoperative status of cases, intraoperative complications, other operative details and POD1 IOP measurements.

Results: A total of 1500 surgeries were included; 68.8% were performed by residents. Overall intraoperative complication rates were similar in groups in simple and complex cases. There was no statistically significant difference in PCT rates between groups in simple (2.4% and 1.9%, p = 0.800) and complex cases (3.7% and 5.1%, p = 0.455). Rate of POD1 IOP elevation above 25 mm Hg was also similar in groups (22.7% and 22.6%, p = 0.903). Pseudoexfoliation + small pupil and special cataracts were significant risk factors for PCT among residents (p = 0.048 and p = 0.033, respectively). Pseudoexfoliation + small pupil, glaucoma or ocular hypertension and uveitis were significant risk factors for POD1 IOP elevation.

Conclusion: Overall intraoperative complication and PCT rates were comparable between residents and staff surgeons in both simple and complex cases. Resident involvement was not a risk factor for POD1 IOP elevation.

住院医师在复杂白内障手术中的安全性及与主治医师的比较分析:1500例连续病例的回顾。
目的:比较某教学医院住院医师与专职医师行原发性白内障超声乳化手术的术中并发症发生率及术后第1天眼压升高的发生率,探讨后囊膜撕裂(PCT)和第1天眼压升高的相关危险因素。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2022年5月27日至2023年5月31日在土耳其一家三级眼科中心由住院医师和专职外科医生进行的所有18岁及以上的原发性超声乳化手术病例。没有排除标准。收集的数据包括主要外科医生、经验水平、病例术前状态、术中并发症、其他手术细节和POD1 IOP测量。结果:共纳入手术1500例;68.8%由住院医师执行。单纯和复杂病例组间总的术中并发症发生率相似。简单病例(2.4%和1.9%,p = 0.800)和复杂病例(3.7%和5.1%,p = 0.455)两组间PCT率差异无统计学意义。两组患者眼压升高25 mm Hg以上的比例相似(22.7%和22.6%,p = 0.903)。假性脱落+小瞳孔和特殊白内障是居民PCT发生的重要危险因素(p = 0.048和p = 0.033)。假脱落+小瞳孔、青光眼或高眼压和葡萄膜炎是POD1 IOP升高的重要危险因素。结论:住院医师和普通外科医师在简单和复杂病例中,术中并发症和PCT发生率均具有可比性。住院医师的介入并不是POD1 IOP升高的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书