Comparison of monoplanar, cross-table bull's-eye, and a hybrid ultrasound-fluoroscopy technique for renal access in supine PCNL: a cognitive mapping approach.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hüseyin Koçakgöl, Abdullah Turan, Muhammed Çağrı Akkuş, Mehmet Eren Öztürk, Deniz Öztürk Koçakgöl, Mehmet Sefa Altay, Muhittin Atar, İbrahim Karabulut
{"title":"Comparison of monoplanar, cross-table bull's-eye, and a hybrid ultrasound-fluoroscopy technique for renal access in supine PCNL: a cognitive mapping approach.","authors":"Hüseyin Koçakgöl, Abdullah Turan, Muhammed Çağrı Akkuş, Mehmet Eren Öztürk, Deniz Öztürk Koçakgöl, Mehmet Sefa Altay, Muhittin Atar, İbrahim Karabulut","doi":"10.1007/s11255-026-05181-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Percutaneous needle access is a critical step in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Supine PCNL, favored for its anesthetic and physiological benefits, can be performed using various puncture techniques. This study compared the efficacy and radiation safety of monoplanar, cross-table bull's-eye, and a combined ultrasound (US)-fluoroscopy-guided access technique for supine PCNL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2021 and March 2025, 130 patients undergoing supine PCNL were reviewed in three groups: monoplanar (Group A, n = 41), cross-table bull's-eye (Group B, n = 45), and combined US-fluoroscopy (Group C, n = 44). In Group C, pre-procedural US established a cognitive vectorial roadmap to determine needle trajectory and depth. Punctures were performed under 0° fluoroscopy, with on-demand refinements using 0-30° rotation and cephalad angulation for depth verification. Perioperative outcomes and radiation times were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total operative time, stone-free (SF) rates, complications, blood transfusion rates, creatinine (Cr) change, hemoglobin (Hb) loss, nephrostomy and hospital stay did not differ significantly among groups (p > 0.05). However, mean fluoroscopy time for successful puncture was significantly lower in the combined US-fluoroscopy group (26.59 s) compared to monoplanar (42.82 s) and cross-table bull's-eye (40.62 s) techniques (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined US-fluoroscopy-guided technique is feasible for supine PCNL and significantly reduces radiation exposure. By integrating US-derived cognitive planning with on-demand fluoroscopic verification, this hybrid approach facilitates efficient needle puncture without compromising procedural precision or clinical success. It serves as a valuable alternative for optimizing radiation safety in urologic practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-026-05181-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Percutaneous needle access is a critical step in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Supine PCNL, favored for its anesthetic and physiological benefits, can be performed using various puncture techniques. This study compared the efficacy and radiation safety of monoplanar, cross-table bull's-eye, and a combined ultrasound (US)-fluoroscopy-guided access technique for supine PCNL.

Methods: Between January 2021 and March 2025, 130 patients undergoing supine PCNL were reviewed in three groups: monoplanar (Group A, n = 41), cross-table bull's-eye (Group B, n = 45), and combined US-fluoroscopy (Group C, n = 44). In Group C, pre-procedural US established a cognitive vectorial roadmap to determine needle trajectory and depth. Punctures were performed under 0° fluoroscopy, with on-demand refinements using 0-30° rotation and cephalad angulation for depth verification. Perioperative outcomes and radiation times were compared.

Results: Total operative time, stone-free (SF) rates, complications, blood transfusion rates, creatinine (Cr) change, hemoglobin (Hb) loss, nephrostomy and hospital stay did not differ significantly among groups (p > 0.05). However, mean fluoroscopy time for successful puncture was significantly lower in the combined US-fluoroscopy group (26.59 s) compared to monoplanar (42.82 s) and cross-table bull's-eye (40.62 s) techniques (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The combined US-fluoroscopy-guided technique is feasible for supine PCNL and significantly reduces radiation exposure. By integrating US-derived cognitive planning with on-demand fluoroscopic verification, this hybrid approach facilitates efficient needle puncture without compromising procedural precision or clinical success. It serves as a valuable alternative for optimizing radiation safety in urologic practice.

平卧位PCNL肾脏通路单面、交叉台靶心和混合超声透视技术的比较:一种认知制图方法。
目的:经皮穿刺是经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的关键步骤。仰卧位PCNL因其麻醉和生理上的好处而受到青睐,可以使用各种穿刺技术进行。本研究比较了单面、横台靶心和超声-透视联合入路技术治疗仰卧PCNL的疗效和放射安全性。方法:在2021年1月至2025年3月期间,将130例接受仰卧PCNL的患者分为三组:单平面(A组,n = 41),交叉表靶心(B组,n = 45)和联合us -透视(C组,n = 44)。在C组,术前US建立了认知向量路线图来确定针头轨迹和深度。在0°透视下进行穿刺,并使用0-30°旋转和头侧成角进行深度验证。比较围手术期疗效和放疗时间。结果:两组患者总手术时间、无结石(SF)率、并发症、输血率、肌酐(Cr)变化、血红蛋白(Hb)损失、肾造瘘及住院时间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。然而,与单平面(42.82 s)和交叉表靶心(40.62 s)技术相比,联合us -透视组成功穿刺的平均透视时间(26.59 s)明显更短。(p)结论:联合us -透视引导技术用于仰卧位PCNL是可行的,并显著减少辐射暴露。通过将美国衍生的认知计划与按需透视验证相结合,这种混合方法可以在不影响程序精度或临床成功的情况下促进有效的针头穿刺。它是泌尿外科实践中优化辐射安全的一种有价值的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书