Evaluating and screening the dosage-dependent bioremediation efficiency of seaweeds and a halophyte species.

IF 3.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wei Huang, Zohaib Noor, Yuchuan Tang, Yi Yang, Yaohua Shi, Zhifeng Gu
{"title":"Evaluating and screening the dosage-dependent bioremediation efficiency of seaweeds and a halophyte species.","authors":"Wei Huang, Zohaib Noor, Yuchuan Tang, Yi Yang, Yaohua Shi, Zhifeng Gu","doi":"10.1080/15226514.2026.2661891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aquatic macrophytes play a critical role as natural bio-remediators of nutrient-enriched aquatic bodies. We aimed to evaluate the nutrient absorption efficiency and growth rate of four seaweeds (<i>Caulerpa lentillifera</i>, <i>Codium fragile</i>, <i>Betaphycus gelatinus</i>, <i>Gracilaria confervoides</i>) and a halophyte (<i>Sesuvium portulacastrum</i>). G0: with no addition of chemicals; G1: with 10 mg/L NH<sub>4</sub>Cl and KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>; G2: with 20 mg/L; and G3: with 30 mg/L. The study revealed variable growth rates, with <i>C. lentillifera</i> consistently showing the highest growth indicators, <i>i.e.,</i> weight gain, specific growth rate, and weight gain, achieving the highest biomass and fastest growth; conversely, <i>S. portulacastrum</i> showed the lowest performance. WGR reached 289% in <i>C. lentillifera</i> at G3, significantly outperforming other species. Across various nutrient treatments, plant-based bioremediation consistently exceeded the G0 group in absorbing NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>N, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>N, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N, PO<sub>4</sub>³<sup>-</sup>, TSS, and COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand). <i>C. lentillifera</i> was mainly responsible for efficient nutrient removal, whilst <i>B. gelatinus</i> and <i>G. confervoides</i> had moderate nutrient removal efficiencies. Conversely, the halophyte <i>S. portulacastrum</i> exhibited relatively low nutrient assimilation, and all the removal rates were lower in each treatment. Overall, the <i>C. lentillifera</i> and <i>C. fragile</i> confirmed the highest nutrient uptake despite an increase in the chemical dosage used for eutrophic water synthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14235,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Phytoremediation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Phytoremediation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2026.2661891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aquatic macrophytes play a critical role as natural bio-remediators of nutrient-enriched aquatic bodies. We aimed to evaluate the nutrient absorption efficiency and growth rate of four seaweeds (Caulerpa lentillifera, Codium fragile, Betaphycus gelatinus, Gracilaria confervoides) and a halophyte (Sesuvium portulacastrum). G0: with no addition of chemicals; G1: with 10 mg/L NH4Cl and KH2PO4; G2: with 20 mg/L; and G3: with 30 mg/L. The study revealed variable growth rates, with C. lentillifera consistently showing the highest growth indicators, i.e., weight gain, specific growth rate, and weight gain, achieving the highest biomass and fastest growth; conversely, S. portulacastrum showed the lowest performance. WGR reached 289% in C. lentillifera at G3, significantly outperforming other species. Across various nutrient treatments, plant-based bioremediation consistently exceeded the G0 group in absorbing NO2-N, NO3-N, NH4+-N, PO4³-, TSS, and COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand). C. lentillifera was mainly responsible for efficient nutrient removal, whilst B. gelatinus and G. confervoides had moderate nutrient removal efficiencies. Conversely, the halophyte S. portulacastrum exhibited relatively low nutrient assimilation, and all the removal rates were lower in each treatment. Overall, the C. lentillifera and C. fragile confirmed the highest nutrient uptake despite an increase in the chemical dosage used for eutrophic water synthesis.

评估和筛选海藻和一种盐生植物的剂量依赖性生物修复效率。
水生植物是富营养化水体的天然生物修复剂,具有重要作用。研究了四种海藻(Caulerpa lentillifera, Codium fragile, Betaphycus gelatinus, Gracilaria convoides)和一种盐生植物(Sesuvium portulacastrum)的营养吸收效率和生长速率。G0:不添加化学品;G1:加入10mg /L NH4Cl和KH2PO4;G2: 20 mg/L;G3: 30mg /L。研究结果表明,小扁豆的生长速率是可变的,其生长指标(增重、特定生长率和增重)均最高,生物量最高,生长速度最快;相反,马齿苋表现最差。在G3时,小扁豆的WGR达到289%,显著优于其他物种。在不同的营养处理中,植物基生物修复在吸收NO2-N、NO3-N、NH4+- n、PO4³-、TSS和COD(化学需氧量)方面始终优于G0组。C. lentillifera主要负责有效的营养物质去除,B. gelatinus和G. convoides的营养物质去除效率中等。相反,盐生植物马齿苋(S. portulacastrum)的养分同化作用相对较低,各处理的去除率均较低。总体而言,尽管用于富营养化水合成的化学剂量有所增加,但扁豆菇和脆弱豆菇的营养吸收量最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Phytoremediation
International Journal of Phytoremediation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Phytoremediation (IJP) is the first journal devoted to the publication of laboratory and field research describing the use of plant systems to solve environmental problems by enabling the remediation of soil, water, and air quality and by restoring ecosystem services in managed landscapes. Traditional phytoremediation has largely focused on soil and groundwater clean-up of hazardous contaminants. Phytotechnology expands this umbrella to include many of the natural resource management challenges we face in cities, on farms, and other landscapes more integrated with daily public activities. Wetlands that treat wastewater, rain gardens that treat stormwater, poplar tree plantings that contain pollutants, urban tree canopies that treat air pollution, and specialized plants that treat decommissioned mine sites are just a few examples of phytotechnologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书