Diagnostic accuracy of transcranial sonography-magnetic resonance fusion imaging for Parkinson's disease versus multiple system atrophy-Parkinsonian type.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2026-04-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2026.1797261
Chao Hou, Wei Zhang, Ji-Zhu Xia, Hui Liu, Ming-Xing Li, Wen He, Li-Qing Peng
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of transcranial sonography-magnetic resonance fusion imaging for Parkinson's disease versus multiple system atrophy-Parkinsonian type.","authors":"Chao Hou, Wei Zhang, Ji-Zhu Xia, Hui Liu, Ming-Xing Li, Wen He, Li-Qing Peng","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2026.1797261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transcranial sonography-magnetic resonance (TCS-MR) fusion imaging shows promise in neurodegenerative diseases, yet current echogenicity assessment methods remain controversial, and its role in differentiating Parkinson's disease (PD) from multiple system atrophy-parkinsonian type (MSA-P) remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic and differential value of TCS-MR fusion imaging for PD versus MSA-P.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>164 PD, 71 MSA-P, and 118 controls who underwent TCS-MR fusion imaging were prospectively enrolled. Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity (SNH) area was calculated. Three planes, designated as SN1, SN2 and SN3 from fusion images were analyzed using ImageJ for grayscale median and pixel count. ROC curves were employed to assess diagnostic and differential diagnostic power.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups concerning SN grades, area of SNH, the ratio of the area of SNH to the midbrain area (S/M), echogenicity of the bilateral SN1, SN3, left SNH, and the maximum echogenicity of SN1, as well as the pixel count of bilateral SNH (<i>p <</i> 0.05). The maximum echogenicity of SN1 and left SN1 demonstrated the highest diagnostic and differential performance for PD, with AUC values of 0.86 and 0.82 (both <i>p <</i> 0.001). Fusion parameters outperformed the SNH area and S/M in both diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PD (Z = 3.84 and 3.71, <i>p <</i> 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TCS-MR fusion imaging demonstrates superior diagnostic and differential performance for PD compared to traditional TCS measurements, suggesting its potential as a novel imaging technique in the diagnosis of PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1797261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13143536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1797261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Transcranial sonography-magnetic resonance (TCS-MR) fusion imaging shows promise in neurodegenerative diseases, yet current echogenicity assessment methods remain controversial, and its role in differentiating Parkinson's disease (PD) from multiple system atrophy-parkinsonian type (MSA-P) remains unknown.

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic and differential value of TCS-MR fusion imaging for PD versus MSA-P.

Patients and methods: 164 PD, 71 MSA-P, and 118 controls who underwent TCS-MR fusion imaging were prospectively enrolled. Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity (SNH) area was calculated. Three planes, designated as SN1, SN2 and SN3 from fusion images were analyzed using ImageJ for grayscale median and pixel count. ROC curves were employed to assess diagnostic and differential diagnostic power.

Results: Statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups concerning SN grades, area of SNH, the ratio of the area of SNH to the midbrain area (S/M), echogenicity of the bilateral SN1, SN3, left SNH, and the maximum echogenicity of SN1, as well as the pixel count of bilateral SNH (p < 0.05). The maximum echogenicity of SN1 and left SN1 demonstrated the highest diagnostic and differential performance for PD, with AUC values of 0.86 and 0.82 (both p < 0.001). Fusion parameters outperformed the SNH area and S/M in both diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PD (Z = 3.84 and 3.71, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: TCS-MR fusion imaging demonstrates superior diagnostic and differential performance for PD compared to traditional TCS measurements, suggesting its potential as a novel imaging technique in the diagnosis of PD.

经颅超声-磁共振融合成像诊断帕金森病与多系统萎缩-帕金森型的准确性比较。
简介:经颅超声-磁共振(TCS-MR)融合成像在神经退行性疾病中显示出前景,但目前的回声性评估方法仍存在争议,其在帕金森病(PD)与多系统萎缩-帕金森型(MSA-P)鉴别中的作用仍不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评价TCS-MR融合成像对PD与MSA-P的诊断和鉴别价值。患者和方法:164名PD, 71名MSA-P和118名对照组接受TCS-MR融合成像。计算黑质高回声(SNH)面积。利用ImageJ对融合图像中的SN1、SN2和SN3三个平面进行灰度中值和像素数分析。ROC曲线用于评估诊断和鉴别诊断能力。结果:三组患者在SNH分级、SNH面积、SNH面积与中脑面积之比(S/M)、双侧SN1、SN3、左侧SNH、SN1最大回声度、双侧SNH像素数等方面差异均有统计学意义(p  0.05)。SN1和左SN1的最大回声增强对PD具有最高的诊断和鉴别价值,AUC值分别为0.86和0.82 (p均为  0.001)。融合参数对PD的诊断和鉴别诊断均优于SNH区和S/M (Z = 3.84和3.71,p  0.01)。结论:与传统的TCS测量相比,TCS- mr融合成像对PD具有更好的诊断和鉴别性能,提示其作为一种新的PD诊断成像技术的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书