Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on spontaneous neural activity in post-stroke aphasia: a protocol for a coordinate-based meta-analysis of fALFF studies.
Yao Rao, Jingjing Zhang, Jiawei Ni, Ming Zeng, Jiali Wu, Hui Xu, Zhiwei Zhao, Cong Wang, Chunlei Shan
{"title":"Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on spontaneous neural activity in post-stroke aphasia: a protocol for a coordinate-based meta-analysis of fALFF studies.","authors":"Yao Rao, Jingjing Zhang, Jiawei Ni, Ming Zeng, Jiali Wu, Hui Xu, Zhiwei Zhao, Cong Wang, Chunlei Shan","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2026.1820631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-stroke aphasia (PSA) is a common and debilitating sequela of stroke that severely impairs quality of life. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), particularly repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has increasingly emerged as a promising adjunctive approach for language recovery in patients with PSA. Although accumulating evidence supports the beneficial effects of NIBS on language outcomes, the neural mechanisms underlying these clinical improvements remain incompletely elucidated. Previous meta-analyses in PSA and stroke have synthesized multiple resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) indices, but no meta-analysis has specifically examined treatment-related fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) changes after NIBS in PSA. This protocol describes a coordinate-based meta-analysis designed to quantitatively synthesize rs-fMRI data, aiming to investigate how NIBS modulates intrinsic neural activity-indexed by fALFF-in patients with PSA.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Two independent reviewers will conduct a systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies published from database inception to December 1, 2025. Eligible studies evaluating the effects of NIBS on fALFF in patients with PSA will be selected based on pre-defined criteria. Only whole-brain voxel-wise fALFF studies reporting stereotactic peak coordinates in standard space will be entered into the primary quantitative AES-SDM analysis; ROI-only studies or studies without usable coordinates will be retained for narrative synthesis. Any discrepancies arising during study selection or data extraction will be resolved through consultation with a third independent reviewer. Neuroimaging reporting quality will be assessed with a customized 20-point checklist, and risk of bias will be evaluated with design-specific tools (RoB 2 for randomized trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomized intervention studies). We will also record studies using other rs-fMRI indices (e.g., ALFF, ReHo, and functional connectivity) during screening to describe the broader evidence base. The primary outcome measures will focus on alterations in specific intrinsic regional neuronal activity assessed via rs-fMRI. The meta-analysis of neuroimaging data will be conducted using Anisotropic Effect Size Seed-Based d Mapping (AES-SDM, version 5.15), while clinical outcome analyses will be performed using RevMan 5.4 software (The Cochrane Collaboration). The reporting of this study will strictly adhere to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study will quantitatively synthesize findings from independent neuroimaging studies to provide comprehensive evidence for identifying the modulation patterns of intrinsic brain activity induced by NIBS in patients with PSA.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Identifier CRD420251275236. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251275236.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1820631"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13143647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1820631","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Post-stroke aphasia (PSA) is a common and debilitating sequela of stroke that severely impairs quality of life. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), particularly repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has increasingly emerged as a promising adjunctive approach for language recovery in patients with PSA. Although accumulating evidence supports the beneficial effects of NIBS on language outcomes, the neural mechanisms underlying these clinical improvements remain incompletely elucidated. Previous meta-analyses in PSA and stroke have synthesized multiple resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) indices, but no meta-analysis has specifically examined treatment-related fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) changes after NIBS in PSA. This protocol describes a coordinate-based meta-analysis designed to quantitatively synthesize rs-fMRI data, aiming to investigate how NIBS modulates intrinsic neural activity-indexed by fALFF-in patients with PSA.
Methods and analysis: Two independent reviewers will conduct a systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies published from database inception to December 1, 2025. Eligible studies evaluating the effects of NIBS on fALFF in patients with PSA will be selected based on pre-defined criteria. Only whole-brain voxel-wise fALFF studies reporting stereotactic peak coordinates in standard space will be entered into the primary quantitative AES-SDM analysis; ROI-only studies or studies without usable coordinates will be retained for narrative synthesis. Any discrepancies arising during study selection or data extraction will be resolved through consultation with a third independent reviewer. Neuroimaging reporting quality will be assessed with a customized 20-point checklist, and risk of bias will be evaluated with design-specific tools (RoB 2 for randomized trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomized intervention studies). We will also record studies using other rs-fMRI indices (e.g., ALFF, ReHo, and functional connectivity) during screening to describe the broader evidence base. The primary outcome measures will focus on alterations in specific intrinsic regional neuronal activity assessed via rs-fMRI. The meta-analysis of neuroimaging data will be conducted using Anisotropic Effect Size Seed-Based d Mapping (AES-SDM, version 5.15), while clinical outcome analyses will be performed using RevMan 5.4 software (The Cochrane Collaboration). The reporting of this study will strictly adhere to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.
Conclusion: This study will quantitatively synthesize findings from independent neuroimaging studies to provide comprehensive evidence for identifying the modulation patterns of intrinsic brain activity induced by NIBS in patients with PSA.
卒中后失语症(PSA)是卒中后常见的衰弱性后遗症,严重影响生活质量。非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS),特别是重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和经颅直流刺激(tDCS),越来越多地成为PSA患者语言恢复的一种有希望的辅助方法。尽管越来越多的证据支持NIBS对语言结果的有益影响,但这些临床改善背后的神经机制仍未完全阐明。先前针对PSA和卒中的荟萃分析已经合成了多个静息状态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)指标,但没有荟萃分析专门研究NIBS后PSA中与治疗相关的低频波动分数幅度(fALFF)变化。该方案描述了一项基于坐标的荟萃分析,旨在定量合成rs-fMRI数据,旨在研究NIBS如何调节PSA患者的内在神经活动(由faff指标)。方法和分析:两名独立审稿人将对PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行系统搜索,查找从数据库建立到2025年12月1日发表的研究。评估NIBS对PSA患者fALFF影响的合格研究将根据预先定义的标准进行选择。只有在标准空间中报告立体定向峰坐标的全脑体素方向的fALFF研究将被纳入主要的定量AES-SDM分析;只有roi的研究或没有可用坐标的研究将被保留用于叙事合成。在研究选择或数据提取过程中产生的任何差异将通过咨询第三方独立审稿人来解决。神经影像学报告质量将采用定制的20点检查表进行评估,偏倚风险将采用设计特定工具进行评估(随机试验的rob2和非随机干预研究的ROBINS-I)。我们还将记录筛选过程中使用其他rs-fMRI指数(如ALFF、ReHo和功能连接)的研究,以描述更广泛的证据基础。主要结果测量将集中于通过rs-fMRI评估的特定内在区域神经元活动的改变。神经影像学数据的meta分析将使用各向异性效应大小种子型d Mapping (AES-SDM, version 5.15)进行,临床结果分析将使用RevMan 5.4软件(The Cochrane Collaboration)进行。本研究的报告将严格遵守PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。结论:本研究将定量综合独立神经影像学研究的结果,为确定NIBS对PSA患者脑内活动的调节模式提供全面的证据。系统评价注册:标识符CRD420251275236。https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251275236。
期刊介绍:
The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.