Epigenetic age acceleration measures and chemotoxicity in older adults with early breast cancer.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jingran Ji, Can-Lan Sun, William Dale, Heeyoung Kim, Vani Katheria, Catherine Lee, Claire Smith, Nala Sun, Yuan Chun Ding, Susan L Neuhausen, Harvey J Cohen, Alexandra Binder, Mina S Sedrak
{"title":"Epigenetic age acceleration measures and chemotoxicity in older adults with early breast cancer.","authors":"Jingran Ji, Can-Lan Sun, William Dale, Heeyoung Kim, Vani Katheria, Catherine Lee, Claire Smith, Nala Sun, Yuan Chun Ding, Susan L Neuhausen, Harvey J Cohen, Alexandra Binder, Mina S Sedrak","doi":"10.1007/s11357-026-02298-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among older adults with early breast cancer, the risk of chemotoxicity can vary widely despite similar chronological age. Here, we evaluated whether epigenetic indicators of biological age can stratify the risk of chemotoxicity in this population. In a prospective study of 394 women age > 65 with stage I-III breast cancer treated with neo/adjuvant chemotherapy, we analyzed peripheral blood DNA methylation patterns to estimate epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) before chemotherapy. We tested five epigenetic clocks. The primary endpoint was grade 2+ chemotoxicity (yes/no, yes defined as any grade 2+ toxicity attributed to chemotherapy). Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the association between EAA and grade 2+ chemotoxicity, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and geriatric covariates. We also evaluated the relationship between EAA and individual grade 2+ toxicities. The median (range) pre-treatment chronological age was 70 years (65-85); 65% had stage II/III disease; 38% received anthracycline; and 75% received G-CSF prophylaxis. A total of 334 (84.8%) participants experienced a grade 2+ toxicity. After multivariable adjustment, there was no significant association between measures of EAA and grade 2+ chemotoxicity. For individual toxicities, EAA by GrimAge was associated with increased risk for infection without neutropenia, and EAA by DunedinPACE was associated with increased risk for diarrhea. In this cohort of older adults with early breast cancer, there was no significant association between pre-treatment EAA and overall grade 2+ chemotoxicity. Further research is needed to examine whether blood-based biomarkers of aging may identify older adults at high risk of chemotoxicity. NCT01472094, Hurria Older PatiEnts (HOPE) with Breast Cancer Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12730,"journal":{"name":"GeroScience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeroScience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-026-02298-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among older adults with early breast cancer, the risk of chemotoxicity can vary widely despite similar chronological age. Here, we evaluated whether epigenetic indicators of biological age can stratify the risk of chemotoxicity in this population. In a prospective study of 394 women age > 65 with stage I-III breast cancer treated with neo/adjuvant chemotherapy, we analyzed peripheral blood DNA methylation patterns to estimate epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) before chemotherapy. We tested five epigenetic clocks. The primary endpoint was grade 2+ chemotoxicity (yes/no, yes defined as any grade 2+ toxicity attributed to chemotherapy). Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the association between EAA and grade 2+ chemotoxicity, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and geriatric covariates. We also evaluated the relationship between EAA and individual grade 2+ toxicities. The median (range) pre-treatment chronological age was 70 years (65-85); 65% had stage II/III disease; 38% received anthracycline; and 75% received G-CSF prophylaxis. A total of 334 (84.8%) participants experienced a grade 2+ toxicity. After multivariable adjustment, there was no significant association between measures of EAA and grade 2+ chemotoxicity. For individual toxicities, EAA by GrimAge was associated with increased risk for infection without neutropenia, and EAA by DunedinPACE was associated with increased risk for diarrhea. In this cohort of older adults with early breast cancer, there was no significant association between pre-treatment EAA and overall grade 2+ chemotoxicity. Further research is needed to examine whether blood-based biomarkers of aging may identify older adults at high risk of chemotoxicity. NCT01472094, Hurria Older PatiEnts (HOPE) with Breast Cancer Study.

老年早期乳腺癌患者的表观遗传年龄加速措施和化学毒性。
在患有早期乳腺癌的老年人中,尽管年龄相似,但化学毒性的风险差异很大。在这里,我们评估了生物年龄的表观遗传指标是否可以对这一人群的化学毒性风险进行分层。在一项前瞻性研究中,研究人员分析了394名年龄在bb0 ~ 65岁之间接受新/辅助化疗的I-III期乳腺癌患者的外周血DNA甲基化模式,以估计化疗前的表观遗传年龄加速(EAA)。我们测试了五个表观遗传时钟。主要终点是2+级化学毒性(是/否,是定义为任何归因于化疗的2+级毒性)。使用多变量逻辑回归,我们检查了EAA和2+级化学毒性之间的关系,调整了人口统计学、临床和老年协变量。我们还评估了EAA与个体2+级毒性之间的关系。治疗前实足年龄中位数(范围)为70岁(65-85岁);65%为II/III期疾病;38%的患者接受蒽环类药物治疗;75%的人接受了G-CSF预防。共有334名(84.8%)参与者经历了2+级毒性。经多变量调整后,EAA测量值与2+级化学毒性之间无显著相关性。对于个体毒性,GrimAge的EAA与无中性粒细胞减少的感染风险增加相关,DunedinPACE的EAA与腹泻风险增加相关。在这个患有早期乳腺癌的老年人队列中,治疗前EAA和总体2+级化学毒性之间没有显着关联。需要进一步的研究来检验基于血液的衰老生物标志物是否可以识别具有化学毒性高风险的老年人。NCT01472094, Hurria老年乳腺癌患者(HOPE)研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GeroScience
GeroScience Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: GeroScience is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles related to research in the biology of aging and research on biomedical applications that impact aging. The scope of articles to be considered include evolutionary biology, biophysics, genetics, genomics, proteomics, molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, endocrinology, immunology, physiology, pharmacology, neuroscience, and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书