Girolamo Mattioli, Maria Stella Cipriani, Stefano Avanzini, Michela Cing Yu Wong, Valentina Rossi, Maria Grazia Faticato
{"title":"Robot-assisted surgery for Hirschsprung disease in children: initial single-center experience.","authors":"Girolamo Mattioli, Maria Stella Cipriani, Stefano Avanzini, Michela Cing Yu Wong, Valentina Rossi, Maria Grazia Faticato","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2026.1797606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic surgery (RS) application to Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) is spreading. The aim of this study was to describe our series of children operated with RS for HSCR, focusing on surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case series of 20 children operated for HSCR disease with robotic approach over a 10-year period (October 2015 to July 2025). Preoperative characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected. A comparison with patients who underwent a laparoscopic surgery for HSCR disease was done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age at surgery was 1.3 years (IQR 0.6-4.8), with a mean weight of 16 kg. Seven-teen patients had rectosigmoid HSCR (85%), and three had long-segment HSCR (15%). The median total operative time was 253 minutes (IQR 188-402), while the median console operative time was 50 minutes (IQR 40-95). Postoperatively, five patients developed mild anastomotic stenosis, and one required redo ileoanal anastomosis (5%). Median follow-up was 11 months (IQ range 5-12). At last follow-up, two patients complained mild constipation with soiling episodes (12%); and two had experienced episodes of HAEC (12%). Comparative analysis with laparoscopy showed no significant differences in operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RS is a safe option for the management of HSCR. More multicentre studies are necessary to define clear indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"13 ","pages":"1797606"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13143961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1797606","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Robotic surgery (RS) application to Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) is spreading. The aim of this study was to describe our series of children operated with RS for HSCR, focusing on surgical outcomes.
Methods: Case series of 20 children operated for HSCR disease with robotic approach over a 10-year period (October 2015 to July 2025). Preoperative characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected. A comparison with patients who underwent a laparoscopic surgery for HSCR disease was done.
Results: The median age at surgery was 1.3 years (IQR 0.6-4.8), with a mean weight of 16 kg. Seven-teen patients had rectosigmoid HSCR (85%), and three had long-segment HSCR (15%). The median total operative time was 253 minutes (IQR 188-402), while the median console operative time was 50 minutes (IQR 40-95). Postoperatively, five patients developed mild anastomotic stenosis, and one required redo ileoanal anastomosis (5%). Median follow-up was 11 months (IQ range 5-12). At last follow-up, two patients complained mild constipation with soiling episodes (12%); and two had experienced episodes of HAEC (12%). Comparative analysis with laparoscopy showed no significant differences in operative outcomes.
Conclusion: RS is a safe option for the management of HSCR. More multicentre studies are necessary to define clear indications.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.