Optimal exercise prescription parameters in Schroth training for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2026-04-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2026.1796813
Daoquan Guan, Yahui Liu, Tongwu Yu, Wen Cheng
{"title":"Optimal exercise prescription parameters in Schroth training for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Daoquan Guan, Yahui Liu, Tongwu Yu, Wen Cheng","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2026.1796813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects 0.5%-5% of the adolescent population, representing the most common spinal deformity in this age group. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine optimal exercise prescription parameters for Schroth training in AIS by examining dose-response relationships between exercise frequency, duration, and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials examining Schroth interventions in adolescents aged 10-18 years with idiopathic scoliosis were included. Network meta-analysis was performed using MetaInsight platform for Cobb angle outcomes, with traditional pairwise meta-analyses conducted for all outcomes using standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 randomized controlled trials encompassing 620 participants were included. The overall meta-analysis demonstrated Schroth exercises produced statistically significant Cobb angle improvements (SMD = -0.52, <i>p</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Subgroup analysis revealed dose-response relationships favouring moderate exercise frequencies (3-4 sessions/week), which showed the largest pooled effect (SMD = -0.58, I<sup>2</sup> = 3%). Duration analysis demonstrated medium duration interventions (46-75 min) provided the most precise improvements (MD = -2.92°), while optimal frequency was the moderate (MD = -2.79°, 95% CI: -4.05, -1.48). Combined subgroup analysis identified moderate frequency plus medium duration as the most robust combination (SMD = -0.65, I<sup>2</sup> = 10%). Health-related quality of life outcomes showed non-significant improvements with substantial heterogeneity (SMD = 0.52, <i>p</i> = 0.43; I<sup>2</sup> = 93%). Secondary outcomes showed statistically significant improvements in trunk rotation (SMD = -0.86, <i>p</i> = 0.002; I<sup>2</sup> = 22%) and cosmetic appearance perception (SMD = -0.73, <i>p</i> = 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), while postural stability measures showed non-significant effects (SMD = 0.08; <i>p</i> = 0.81; I<sup>2</sup> = 68%). Publication bias assessment using Egger's test shows no statistically significant funnel plot asymmetry (<i>p</i> = 0.745).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exploratory subgroup and network meta-analyses suggest that moderate frequency Schroth exercises (3-4 sessions/week) combined with medium duration sessions (46-75 min) may represent optimal parameters for Cobb angle improvement in AIS. Non-linear dose-response patterns show diminishing returns at higher frequencies, challenging conventional exercise prescription assumptions. These findings require validation through prospective studies with pre-specified dose-stratification examining long-term effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and patient adherence across diverse healthcare contexts before broad clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"13 ","pages":"1796813"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13143934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1796813","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects 0.5%-5% of the adolescent population, representing the most common spinal deformity in this age group. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine optimal exercise prescription parameters for Schroth training in AIS by examining dose-response relationships between exercise frequency, duration, and clinical outcomes.

Methods: Systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials examining Schroth interventions in adolescents aged 10-18 years with idiopathic scoliosis were included. Network meta-analysis was performed using MetaInsight platform for Cobb angle outcomes, with traditional pairwise meta-analyses conducted for all outcomes using standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: 15 randomized controlled trials encompassing 620 participants were included. The overall meta-analysis demonstrated Schroth exercises produced statistically significant Cobb angle improvements (SMD = -0.52, p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis revealed dose-response relationships favouring moderate exercise frequencies (3-4 sessions/week), which showed the largest pooled effect (SMD = -0.58, I2 = 3%). Duration analysis demonstrated medium duration interventions (46-75 min) provided the most precise improvements (MD = -2.92°), while optimal frequency was the moderate (MD = -2.79°, 95% CI: -4.05, -1.48). Combined subgroup analysis identified moderate frequency plus medium duration as the most robust combination (SMD = -0.65, I2 = 10%). Health-related quality of life outcomes showed non-significant improvements with substantial heterogeneity (SMD = 0.52, p = 0.43; I2 = 93%). Secondary outcomes showed statistically significant improvements in trunk rotation (SMD = -0.86, p = 0.002; I2 = 22%) and cosmetic appearance perception (SMD = -0.73, p = 0.01; I2 = 0%), while postural stability measures showed non-significant effects (SMD = 0.08; p = 0.81; I2 = 68%). Publication bias assessment using Egger's test shows no statistically significant funnel plot asymmetry (p = 0.745).

Conclusions: Exploratory subgroup and network meta-analyses suggest that moderate frequency Schroth exercises (3-4 sessions/week) combined with medium duration sessions (46-75 min) may represent optimal parameters for Cobb angle improvement in AIS. Non-linear dose-response patterns show diminishing returns at higher frequencies, challenging conventional exercise prescription assumptions. These findings require validation through prospective studies with pre-specified dose-stratification examining long-term effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and patient adherence across diverse healthcare contexts before broad clinical implementation.

青少年特发性脊柱侧凸Schroth训练的最佳运动处方参数:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)影响了0.5%-5%的青少年人群,代表了这个年龄段最常见的脊柱畸形。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在通过检查运动频率、持续时间和临床结果之间的剂量-反应关系,确定AIS患者Schroth训练的最佳运动处方参数。方法:按照PRISMA 2020指南系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和SPORTDiscus。纳入了10-18岁特发性脊柱侧凸青少年施罗斯干预的随机对照试验。使用MetaInsight平台对Cobb角结果进行网络荟萃分析,使用95%置信区间的标准化平均差异对所有结果进行传统的两两荟萃分析。结果:纳入15项随机对照试验,共纳入620名受试者。整体荟萃分析表明,Schroth锻炼可显著改善Cobb角(SMD = -0.52, p 2 = 0%)。亚组分析显示,剂量-反应关系有利于中等运动频率(3-4次/周),其综合效应最大(SMD = -0.58, I2 = 3%)。持续时间分析表明,中等持续时间干预(46-75分钟)提供了最精确的改善(MD = -2.92°),而最佳频率是中等(MD = -2.79°,95% CI: -4.05, -1.48)。联合亚组分析发现,中等频率加中等持续时间是最稳健的组合(SMD = -0.65, I2 = 10%)。与健康相关的生活质量结果无显著改善,存在很大的异质性(SMD = 0.52, p = 0.43; I2 = 93%)。次要结果显示躯干旋转(SMD = -0.86, p = 0.002; I2 = 22%)和外观感知(SMD = -0.73, p = 0.01; I2 = 0%)有统计学意义上的改善,而姿势稳定性措施无显著影响(SMD = 0.08, p = 0.81; I2 = 68%)。用Egger’s检验进行发表偏倚评估,没有统计学上显著的漏斗图不对称(p = 0.745)。结论:探索性亚组和网络荟萃分析表明,中等频率的Schroth运动(3-4次/周)结合中等持续时间的运动(46-75分钟)可能是改善AIS患者Cobb角的最佳参数。非线性剂量-反应模式显示高频率下的收益递减,挑战了传统的运动处方假设。在广泛的临床应用之前,这些发现需要通过预先指定剂量分层的前瞻性研究来验证,检查不同医疗保健背景下的长期有效性、成本效益和患者依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书