Measurement Techniques and Properties of Single-item Measures for the Evaluation of Oropharyngeal Muscle Function in Adults with Dysphagia: A Systematic Review using the COSMIN Framework.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Eileen Kelly, Joelle Hako, Anna Creagh Chapman, Brigitta Fazzini, Timothy J Stephens, Renée Speyer, Anna-Liisa Sutt, Zudin Puthucheary
{"title":"Measurement Techniques and Properties of Single-item Measures for the Evaluation of Oropharyngeal Muscle Function in Adults with Dysphagia: A Systematic Review using the COSMIN Framework.","authors":"Eileen Kelly, Joelle Hako, Anna Creagh Chapman, Brigitta Fazzini, Timothy J Stephens, Renée Speyer, Anna-Liisa Sutt, Zudin Puthucheary","doi":"10.1007/s00455-026-10957-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Muscle dysfunction is a critical construct in dysphagia. Despite the availability of diverse techniques to evaluate muscle function, a comprehensive synthesis of measurement items and their properties is lacking. A systematic review of studies examining the measurement techniques used to directly evaluate oropharyngeal muscle function was performed. Studies investigating the use of surface electromyography, tongue dynamometry, ultrasound, high-resolution pharyngeal manometry, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography and reporting measurement properties in line with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement InstrumeNts (COSMIN) were included. Measurement outcomes derived from these techniques were operationalised as single-item measures. Methodological quality was evaluated using the QualSyst tool. From the 6279 records, 125 eligible studies were identified. The breakdown of techniques was surface electromyography (n = 33), tongue dynamometry (n = 34), ultrasound (n = 17), high-resolution pharyngeal manometry (n = 15), magnetic resonance imaging (n = 5), computed tomography (n = 4) and combined techniques (n = 17). Single-item measures were heterogenous, covering a range of domains including muscle activation, coordination, strength, endurance, composition, thickness, and kinematics. Studies focused predominantly on oral rather than pharyngeal musculature. Validity (n = 117) was widely reported, primarily via known-group validity or hypothesis testing. Fewer studies examined reliability (n = 20) and responsiveness (n = 25); however, where reported, results indicated excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability and responsiveness to therapeutic interventions. A diverse range of single-item measures were identified across included measurement techniques. Measurement properties were sparsely reported. Future research should focus on rigorous measurement instrument design and standardisation to comprehensively evaluate the underlying mechanisms of dysphagia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-026-10957-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Muscle dysfunction is a critical construct in dysphagia. Despite the availability of diverse techniques to evaluate muscle function, a comprehensive synthesis of measurement items and their properties is lacking. A systematic review of studies examining the measurement techniques used to directly evaluate oropharyngeal muscle function was performed. Studies investigating the use of surface electromyography, tongue dynamometry, ultrasound, high-resolution pharyngeal manometry, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography and reporting measurement properties in line with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement InstrumeNts (COSMIN) were included. Measurement outcomes derived from these techniques were operationalised as single-item measures. Methodological quality was evaluated using the QualSyst tool. From the 6279 records, 125 eligible studies were identified. The breakdown of techniques was surface electromyography (n = 33), tongue dynamometry (n = 34), ultrasound (n = 17), high-resolution pharyngeal manometry (n = 15), magnetic resonance imaging (n = 5), computed tomography (n = 4) and combined techniques (n = 17). Single-item measures were heterogenous, covering a range of domains including muscle activation, coordination, strength, endurance, composition, thickness, and kinematics. Studies focused predominantly on oral rather than pharyngeal musculature. Validity (n = 117) was widely reported, primarily via known-group validity or hypothesis testing. Fewer studies examined reliability (n = 20) and responsiveness (n = 25); however, where reported, results indicated excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability and responsiveness to therapeutic interventions. A diverse range of single-item measures were identified across included measurement techniques. Measurement properties were sparsely reported. Future research should focus on rigorous measurement instrument design and standardisation to comprehensively evaluate the underlying mechanisms of dysphagia.

成人吞咽困难患者口咽肌功能单项评估的测量技术和特性:使用COSMIN框架的系统评价。
肌肉功能障碍是吞咽困难的重要组成部分。尽管有多种评估肌肉功能的技术,但缺乏对测量项目及其特性的全面综合。系统的研究审查的测量技术,用于直接评估口咽肌功能进行了。包括调查使用表面肌电图、舌动力测量、超声、高分辨率咽测压、磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描的研究,并根据基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)报告测量特性。从这些技术中得出的测量结果作为单项测量进行操作。使用QualSyst工具评估方法学质量。从6279份记录中,确定了125份符合条件的研究。技术分类为表面肌电图(n = 33)、舌动力测量(n = 34)、超声(n = 17)、高分辨率咽压测量(n = 15)、磁共振成像(n = 5)、计算机断层扫描(n = 4)和综合技术(n = 17)。单项目测量是异质的,涵盖了一系列领域,包括肌肉激活、协调、力量、耐力、成分、厚度和运动学。研究主要集中在口腔而不是咽肌肉组织。效度(n = 117)被广泛报道,主要是通过已知组效度或假设检验。较少的研究考察了可靠性(n = 20)和响应性(n = 25);然而,在报道中,结果显示了出色的内部和内部可靠性和对治疗干预的反应性。在包括的测量技术中确定了不同范围的单项目测量。测量特性很少报道。未来的研究应着眼于严格的测量仪器设计和标准化,以全面评估吞咽困难的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书