Biological effects of a premixed calcium silicate pulp-capping material containing dimethyl sulphoxide as a vehicle: In vitro and in vivo study

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
European Journal of Oral Sciences Pub Date : 2026-09-17 Epub Date: 2026-05-06 DOI:10.1111/eos.70096
Min-Ji Choi, Eun-Sook Kang, Min-Kyeong Kim, Kenta Tsuchiya, Jukka P. Matinlinna, Kwang-Won Lee, Kyung-San Min
{"title":"Biological effects of a premixed calcium silicate pulp-capping material containing dimethyl sulphoxide as a vehicle: In vitro and in vivo study","authors":"Min-Ji Choi,&nbsp;Eun-Sook Kang,&nbsp;Min-Kyeong Kim,&nbsp;Kenta Tsuchiya,&nbsp;Jukka P. Matinlinna,&nbsp;Kwang-Won Lee,&nbsp;Kyung-San Min","doi":"10.1111/eos.70096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to compare the biological performance of a hydraulic calcium silicate cement (EndocemMTA Premixed) containing dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), developed to improve handling properties, in comparison with ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. Human dental pulp cells were used for in vitro evaluation of cytocompatibility, cell migration and cell–material interactions. Odontogenic differentiation was assessed using a 3D culture model designed to simulate the clinical environment. Pulp capping was performed in vivo on rat maxillary molars, and reparative dentin formation and pulpal inflammatory responses were evaluated using micro-computed tomography (<i>µ</i>CT) and histological analyses. In vitro, all investigated materials exhibited comparable cytocompatibility, cell migratory behaviour and odontogenic marker expression, with no significant differences among study groups. The <i>µ</i>CT analysis demonstrated significantly greater reparative dentin formation in all experimental groups compared with the control, with Biodentine producing a higher dentin volume than EndocemMTA Premixed. Histological evaluation revealed no significant differences among the experimental groups with respect to pulpal inflammation or dentin bridge continuity. These findings suggest that the incorporation of DMSO into premixed formulations would not adversely affect cytocompatibility or pulp healing. Moreover, the 3D model used in this study might serve as a clinically relevant platform for evaluating pulp–material interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"134 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.70096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the biological performance of a hydraulic calcium silicate cement (EndocemMTA Premixed) containing dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), developed to improve handling properties, in comparison with ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. Human dental pulp cells were used for in vitro evaluation of cytocompatibility, cell migration and cell–material interactions. Odontogenic differentiation was assessed using a 3D culture model designed to simulate the clinical environment. Pulp capping was performed in vivo on rat maxillary molars, and reparative dentin formation and pulpal inflammatory responses were evaluated using micro-computed tomography (µCT) and histological analyses. In vitro, all investigated materials exhibited comparable cytocompatibility, cell migratory behaviour and odontogenic marker expression, with no significant differences among study groups. The µCT analysis demonstrated significantly greater reparative dentin formation in all experimental groups compared with the control, with Biodentine producing a higher dentin volume than EndocemMTA Premixed. Histological evaluation revealed no significant differences among the experimental groups with respect to pulpal inflammation or dentin bridge continuity. These findings suggest that the incorporation of DMSO into premixed formulations would not adversely affect cytocompatibility or pulp healing. Moreover, the 3D model used in this study might serve as a clinically relevant platform for evaluating pulp–material interactions.

以二甲基亚砜为载体的硅酸钙浆盖料的生物效应:体外和体内研究。
本研究旨在比较含有二甲亚砜(DMSO)的水力硅酸钙水泥(EndocemMTA预混料)的生物性能,并与prooroot矿物三氧化物骨料和Biodentine进行比较。用人牙髓细胞体外评价细胞相容性、细胞迁移和细胞-物质相互作用。用三维培养模型模拟临床环境来评估牙源性分化。在大鼠上颌磨牙上进行牙髓盖盖,并通过显微计算机断层扫描(µCT)和组织学分析评估修复性牙本质形成和牙髓炎症反应。在体外,所有被研究的材料都表现出相似的细胞相容性、细胞迁移行为和牙源性标志物表达,实验组之间没有显著差异。微CT分析显示,与对照组相比,所有实验组的修复性牙本质形成显著增加,Biodentine产生的牙本质体积高于endocemta预混。组织学评价显示实验组之间在牙髓炎和牙本质桥连续性方面无显著差异。这些发现表明,将DMSO掺入预混制剂不会对细胞相容性或牙髓愈合产生不利影响。此外,本研究中使用的3D模型可能作为评估髓质相互作用的临床相关平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书