Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic polytherapy on rehospitalization in psychotic disorders: A French nationwide cohort analysis.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Pierre-Michel Llorca, Bruno Falissard, Emmanuelle Baloche, Riad Bournane, Aurélie Schmidt, Mallory Cals-Maurette, Arnaud Panes, Philippe Nuss
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic polytherapy on rehospitalization in psychotic disorders: A French nationwide cohort analysis.","authors":"Pierre-Michel Llorca, Bruno Falissard, Emmanuelle Baloche, Riad Bournane, Aurélie Schmidt, Mallory Cals-Maurette, Arnaud Panes, Philippe Nuss","doi":"10.1016/j.comppsych.2026.152704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antipsychotic polytherapy (APP) is common in clinical practice for psychotic disorders. Previous studies suggest that APP may offer advantages over monotherapy (APM) regarding effectiveness and all-cause discontinuation. This nationwide study assessed the reproducibility and robustness of these findings. The primary objective was to compare psychiatric readmission rates between APP and APM in psychotic disorder patients METHODS: Data were extracted from the French National Health insurance database (SNDS). Patients aged 18 or older with at least one psychiatric hospitalization between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2020 were included. The primary outcome was time to psychiatric readmission. A within-individual study design was applied to limit confounding, by comparing periods with different treatment exposures within the same patient FINDINGS: A total of 234,959 adults with at least one hospitalization for a psychotic condition were included, with a median follow-up of 7 years. Antipsychotic treatment was associated with a (20%-50%) reduction in psychiatric readmission risk compared with no treatment. Rehospitalization remained common (71.6%). The median cumulative rehospitalization duration was 67 days, and 21.8% of patients had more than four admissions. Among the 71.1% exposed to APP, several combinations demonstrated distinct benefits. Clozapine-inclusive combinations (with risperidone or amisulpride) and loxapine-amisulpride combinations reduced rehospitalization risk. Quetiapine combinations also lowered risk by (10%- 20%) compared with quetiapine monotherapy INTERPRETATION: Derived from a large cohort, our findings corroborate previous evidence that APP's benefit reduces psychiatric rehospitalization and support its utility for psychotic specific patient subpopulations. This study confirms the reproducibility and robustness of APP's effectiveness in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10554,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychiatry","volume":"148 ","pages":"152704"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2026.152704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antipsychotic polytherapy (APP) is common in clinical practice for psychotic disorders. Previous studies suggest that APP may offer advantages over monotherapy (APM) regarding effectiveness and all-cause discontinuation. This nationwide study assessed the reproducibility and robustness of these findings. The primary objective was to compare psychiatric readmission rates between APP and APM in psychotic disorder patients METHODS: Data were extracted from the French National Health insurance database (SNDS). Patients aged 18 or older with at least one psychiatric hospitalization between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2020 were included. The primary outcome was time to psychiatric readmission. A within-individual study design was applied to limit confounding, by comparing periods with different treatment exposures within the same patient FINDINGS: A total of 234,959 adults with at least one hospitalization for a psychotic condition were included, with a median follow-up of 7 years. Antipsychotic treatment was associated with a (20%-50%) reduction in psychiatric readmission risk compared with no treatment. Rehospitalization remained common (71.6%). The median cumulative rehospitalization duration was 67 days, and 21.8% of patients had more than four admissions. Among the 71.1% exposed to APP, several combinations demonstrated distinct benefits. Clozapine-inclusive combinations (with risperidone or amisulpride) and loxapine-amisulpride combinations reduced rehospitalization risk. Quetiapine combinations also lowered risk by (10%- 20%) compared with quetiapine monotherapy INTERPRETATION: Derived from a large cohort, our findings corroborate previous evidence that APP's benefit reduces psychiatric rehospitalization and support its utility for psychotic specific patient subpopulations. This study confirms the reproducibility and robustness of APP's effectiveness in real-world settings.

抗精神病综合治疗对精神障碍患者再住院的实际有效性:法国全国队列分析。
背景:抗精神病综合治疗(APP)在精神障碍的临床实践中很常见。先前的研究表明,APP在有效性和全因停药方面可能优于单药治疗(APM)。这项全国性的研究评估了这些发现的可重复性和稳健性。主要目的是比较APP和APM在精神障碍患者中的再入院率。方法:数据取自法国国家健康保险数据库(SNDS)。纳入了2014年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间至少住院一次的18岁或以上患者。主要观察指标为再入院时间。通过比较同一患者接受不同治疗的时间段,采用个体内研究设计来限制混淆。研究发现:共有234,959名至少因精神疾病住院一次的成年人被纳入研究,中位随访时间为7年。与未治疗相比,抗精神病药物治疗与精神病再入院风险降低(20%-50%)相关。再次住院仍然很常见(71.6%)。中位累计再住院时间为67天,21.8%的患者住院次数超过4次。在71.1%暴露于APP的患者中,几种组合显示出明显的益处。氯氮平联合(利培酮或氨硫pride)和洛沙平-氨硫pride联合可降低再住院风险。与喹硫平单药治疗相比,喹硫平联合治疗的风险也降低了(10%- 20%)。解释:我们的研究结果来自一个大型队列,证实了先前的证据,即APP的益处减少了精神病患者再住院,并支持其对精神病特定患者亚群的效用。本研究证实了APP在现实世界中有效性的可重复性和稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comprehensive psychiatry
Comprehensive psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: "Comprehensive Psychiatry" is an open access, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the field of psychiatry and mental health. Its primary mission is to share the latest advancements in knowledge to enhance patient care and deepen the understanding of mental illnesses. The journal is supported by a diverse team of international editors and peer reviewers, ensuring the publication of high-quality research with a strong focus on clinical relevance and the implications for psychopathology. "Comprehensive Psychiatry" encourages authors to present their research in an accessible manner, facilitating engagement with clinicians, policymakers, and the broader public. By embracing an open access policy, the journal aims to maximize the global impact of its content, making it readily available to a wide audience and fostering scientific collaboration and public awareness beyond the traditional academic community. This approach is designed to promote a more inclusive and informed dialogue on mental health, contributing to the overall progress in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书