Implications of Cranial Arterial Stenosis and Dolichoectasia for Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease Etiopathogenesis: Findings From a Prospective Mild Stroke Cohort.

IF 38.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Fei Han, Una Clancy, Carmen Arteaga-Reyes, Michael J Thrippleton, Maria Del C Valdés Hernández, Daniela Jaime Garcia, Michael S Stringer, Ellen Backhouse, Francesca M Chappell, Yajun Cheng, Dillys Xiaodi Liu, Junfang Zhang, Angela C C Jochems, Eleni Sakka, Charlotte Jardine, Gayle Barclay, Donna McIntyre, Iona Hamilton, Rosalind Brown, Yi-Cheng Zhu, Fergus N Doubal, Joanna M Wardlaw
{"title":"Implications of Cranial Arterial Stenosis and Dolichoectasia for Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease Etiopathogenesis: Findings From a Prospective Mild Stroke Cohort.","authors":"Fei Han, Una Clancy, Carmen Arteaga-Reyes, Michael J Thrippleton, Maria Del C Valdés Hernández, Daniela Jaime Garcia, Michael S Stringer, Ellen Backhouse, Francesca M Chappell, Yajun Cheng, Dillys Xiaodi Liu, Junfang Zhang, Angela C C Jochems, Eleni Sakka, Charlotte Jardine, Gayle Barclay, Donna McIntyre, Iona Hamilton, Rosalind Brown, Yi-Cheng Zhu, Fergus N Doubal, Joanna M Wardlaw","doi":"10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.126.079493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stenosis and dolichoectasia of cranial arteries likely reflect distinct mechanisms. Their contributions to lacunar stroke and cerebral small-vessel disease (cSVD) remain contentious. We investigated the associations of large-artery stenosis (LAS) and arterial widening with stroke subtype, cSVD markers, incident infarcts, and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively recruited patients with lacunar or mild nonlacunar stroke, with demographic, stroke-related, cognitive, functional, and magnetic resonance imaging (index and incident infarcts, cSVD markers) assessments at baseline and 1 year. LAS was defined as ≥50% intracranial or cervical artery stenosis; basilar artery dolichoectasia was defined by basilar artery diameter, bifurcation height, and lateral displacement; and intracranial carotid and middle cerebral artery diameters were also measured. Associations were estimated from multivariable logistic, linear, and proportional odds regression models adjusted for age, sex, and vascular risk factors. We further conducted a systematic literature review to synthesize evidence on relationships between large-artery pathology and cSVD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 229 patients (mean age, 65.9±11.1 years; 131 [57.2% ] lacunar stroke), LAS and basilar artery dolichoectasia were present in 20.5% and 15.7%, respectively. After adjustment, LAS (odds ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.23-0.99]) and the presence of any embolic source were associated with lower odds of lacunar versus non-lacunar stroke, and not with cSVD markers or incident infarcts. In contrast, basilar artery dolichoectasia was strongly associated with lacunar stroke (odds ratio, 4.67 [95% CI, 1.87-13.14]), higher cSVD scores (ordinal analysis; odds ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.28-5.25]), incident infarcts (75% subcortical; odds ratio, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.01-5.14]), and greater progression of white matter hyperintensities over 1 year (β, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.01-0.29] per log10-transformed volume). Similar associations were observed for wider intracranial arteries. The systematic review supported these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>cSVD, including lacunar stroke, was unrelated to LAS but strongly associated with dolichoectasia and wider arteries. These findings support a nonatheromatous, intrinsic microvascular pathology, particularly segmental arteriolar disorganization, as the principal mechanism of lacunar stroke and cSVD. Mechanism-specific diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10331,"journal":{"name":"Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":38.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.126.079493","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stenosis and dolichoectasia of cranial arteries likely reflect distinct mechanisms. Their contributions to lacunar stroke and cerebral small-vessel disease (cSVD) remain contentious. We investigated the associations of large-artery stenosis (LAS) and arterial widening with stroke subtype, cSVD markers, incident infarcts, and clinical outcomes.

Methods: We prospectively recruited patients with lacunar or mild nonlacunar stroke, with demographic, stroke-related, cognitive, functional, and magnetic resonance imaging (index and incident infarcts, cSVD markers) assessments at baseline and 1 year. LAS was defined as ≥50% intracranial or cervical artery stenosis; basilar artery dolichoectasia was defined by basilar artery diameter, bifurcation height, and lateral displacement; and intracranial carotid and middle cerebral artery diameters were also measured. Associations were estimated from multivariable logistic, linear, and proportional odds regression models adjusted for age, sex, and vascular risk factors. We further conducted a systematic literature review to synthesize evidence on relationships between large-artery pathology and cSVD.

Results: Among 229 patients (mean age, 65.9±11.1 years; 131 [57.2% ] lacunar stroke), LAS and basilar artery dolichoectasia were present in 20.5% and 15.7%, respectively. After adjustment, LAS (odds ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.23-0.99]) and the presence of any embolic source were associated with lower odds of lacunar versus non-lacunar stroke, and not with cSVD markers or incident infarcts. In contrast, basilar artery dolichoectasia was strongly associated with lacunar stroke (odds ratio, 4.67 [95% CI, 1.87-13.14]), higher cSVD scores (ordinal analysis; odds ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.28-5.25]), incident infarcts (75% subcortical; odds ratio, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.01-5.14]), and greater progression of white matter hyperintensities over 1 year (β, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.01-0.29] per log10-transformed volume). Similar associations were observed for wider intracranial arteries. The systematic review supported these findings.

Conclusions: cSVD, including lacunar stroke, was unrelated to LAS but strongly associated with dolichoectasia and wider arteries. These findings support a nonatheromatous, intrinsic microvascular pathology, particularly segmental arteriolar disorganization, as the principal mechanism of lacunar stroke and cSVD. Mechanism-specific diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are warranted.

颅动脉狭窄和颈动脉扩张在脑血管病发病中的意义:来自一项前瞻性轻度卒中队列研究的发现。
背景:颅动脉狭窄和颈动脉扩张可能反映了不同的机制。它们在腔隙性卒中和脑血管病(cSVD)中的作用仍有争议。我们研究了大动脉狭窄(LAS)和动脉扩宽与卒中亚型、cSVD标志物、梗死事件和临床结果的关系。方法:我们前瞻性地招募腔隙性或轻度非腔隙性卒中患者,在基线和1年时进行人口统计学、卒中相关、认知、功能和磁共振成像(指数和梗死事件、cSVD标志物)评估。LAS定义为颅内或颈动脉狭窄≥50%;以基底动脉直径、分岔高度、外侧位移为标准判断基底动脉过度扩张;同时测量颅内颈动脉和大脑中动脉直径。通过调整年龄、性别和血管危险因素的多变量logistic、线性和比例odds回归模型来估计相关性。我们进一步进行了系统的文献综述,以综合大动脉病理与cSVD之间关系的证据。结果229例患者(平均年龄65.9±11.1岁;131例[57.2%]腔隙性脑卒中)中,LAS和基底动脉宽缩分别占20.5%和15.7%。调整后,LAS(优势比0.49 [95% CI, 0.23-0.99])和任何栓塞源的存在与腔隙性卒中与非腔隙性卒中的较低几率相关,而与cSVD标志物或突发梗死无关。相比之下,基底动脉血管扩张与腔隙性卒中(优势比,4.67 [95% CI, 1.87-13.14])、较高的cSVD评分(有序分析;优势比,2.57 [95% CI, 1.28-5.25])、梗死发生率(75%皮质下;优势比,2.29 [95% CI, 1.01-5.14])以及1年内白质高信号的更大进展(β, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.01-0.29] / log10转换体积)密切相关。颅内动脉较宽也有类似的关联。系统评价支持这些发现。结论:包括腔隙性卒中在内的cSVD与LAS无关,但与血管扩张和更宽的动脉密切相关。这些发现支持非动脉粥样硬化、内在微血管病理,特别是节段性小动脉紊乱,是腔隙性卒中和心血管疾病的主要机制。机制特异性诊断和治疗策略是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation
Circulation 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
45.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
1473
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Circulation is a platform that publishes a diverse range of content related to cardiovascular health and disease. This includes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other contributions spanning observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services, outcomes studies, and advancements in basic and translational research. The journal serves as a vital resource for professionals and researchers in the field of cardiovascular health, providing a comprehensive platform for disseminating knowledge and fostering advancements in the understanding and management of cardiovascular issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书