Circulating Level of Growth-Differentiation Factor 15 and Mortality of Patients With Acute Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pingkui Jin, Yanjie Geng, Erwei Huo, Yanhong Xue, Daofeng You, Qinghou Zheng
{"title":"Circulating Level of Growth-Differentiation Factor 15 and Mortality of Patients With Acute Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Pingkui Jin, Yanjie Geng, Erwei Huo, Yanhong Xue, Daofeng You, Qinghou Zheng","doi":"10.1002/clc.70338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is a stress-responsive biomarker implicated in inflammation and myocardial injury. Its prognostic value for mortality risk in acute heart failure (AHF) remains uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluated the association between elevated admission circulating GDF-15 levels and subsequent mortality in patients hospitalized with AHF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched for prospective or retrospective cohort studies and post-hoc trial analyses enrolling adult AHF patients with blood GDF-15 measured on admission. Risk ratios (RRs) for all-cause mortality comparing high versus low GDF-15 categories were pooled using random-effects models incorporating the influence of potential heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies with 3724 patients with AHF were included. Overall, high admission GDF-15 levels were significantly associated with increased mortality risk during follow-up (RR = 2.82, 95% CI: 2.39-3.32; p < 0.001), with no evidence of between-study inconsistency (I² = 0%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness (leave-one-out RR range: 2.73-3.00), and results remained consistent in high-quality studies (NOS ≥ 8; RR = 2.72, 95% CI: 2.26-3.27). Subgroup analyses demonstrated similar associations across Asian and Western cohorts, prospective and retrospective designs, different sampling times (at admission to within 48 h), assay methods (ELISA vs. ECLIA), cutoff definitions, follow-up duration, and adjustment for BNP/NT-proBNP (all p for subgroup differences >0.05). No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's p = 0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated circulating GDF-15 levels at admission are strongly associated with increased mortality risk in patients with AHF, supporting its potential role in early risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 5","pages":"e70338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13147355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is a stress-responsive biomarker implicated in inflammation and myocardial injury. Its prognostic value for mortality risk in acute heart failure (AHF) remains uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluated the association between elevated admission circulating GDF-15 levels and subsequent mortality in patients hospitalized with AHF.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched for prospective or retrospective cohort studies and post-hoc trial analyses enrolling adult AHF patients with blood GDF-15 measured on admission. Risk ratios (RRs) for all-cause mortality comparing high versus low GDF-15 categories were pooled using random-effects models incorporating the influence of potential heterogeneity.

Results: Ten studies with 3724 patients with AHF were included. Overall, high admission GDF-15 levels were significantly associated with increased mortality risk during follow-up (RR = 2.82, 95% CI: 2.39-3.32; p < 0.001), with no evidence of between-study inconsistency (I² = 0%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness (leave-one-out RR range: 2.73-3.00), and results remained consistent in high-quality studies (NOS ≥ 8; RR = 2.72, 95% CI: 2.26-3.27). Subgroup analyses demonstrated similar associations across Asian and Western cohorts, prospective and retrospective designs, different sampling times (at admission to within 48 h), assay methods (ELISA vs. ECLIA), cutoff definitions, follow-up duration, and adjustment for BNP/NT-proBNP (all p for subgroup differences >0.05). No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's p = 0.59).

Conclusions: Elevated circulating GDF-15 levels at admission are strongly associated with increased mortality risk in patients with AHF, supporting its potential role in early risk stratification.

急性心力衰竭患者循环生长分化因子15水平与死亡率的meta分析
背景:生长分化因子-15 (GDF-15)是一种应激反应性生物标志物,与炎症和心肌损伤有关。其对急性心力衰竭(AHF)死亡风险的预后价值仍不确定。本荟萃分析评估了AHF住院患者入院循环GDF-15水平升高与随后死亡率之间的关系。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science,纳入入院时血液GDF-15测量的成年AHF患者的前瞻性或回顾性队列研究和事后试验分析。采用纳入潜在异质性影响的随机效应模型,对高GDF-15与低GDF-15类别的全因死亡率风险比(rr)进行汇总。结果:纳入10项研究,共3724例AHF患者。总体而言,入院时GDF-15水平高与随访期间死亡风险增加显著相关(RR = 2.82, 95% CI: 2.39-3.32; p 0.05)。未发现显著的发表偏倚(Egger’s p = 0.59)。结论:入院时循环GDF-15水平升高与AHF患者死亡风险增加密切相关,支持其在早期风险分层中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书