Scientific trends in obstructive sleep apnea biological and clinical assessment indicators: a bibliometric analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Shudan Deng, Haixia Fan, Lu Zhai, Limantian Wang, Yan Li, Bomeng Zhao, Huiyan Niu, Xiaoling Gao
{"title":"Scientific trends in obstructive sleep apnea biological and clinical assessment indicators: a bibliometric analysis.","authors":"Shudan Deng, Haixia Fan, Lu Zhai, Limantian Wang, Yan Li, Bomeng Zhao, Huiyan Niu, Xiaoling Gao","doi":"10.1080/17520363.2026.2671003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by diverse biological and clinical disturbances, yet no study has systematically examined scientific developments related to its objective assessment measures. This study aimed to map the development, research hotspots, and emerging trends related to biological and clinical assessment indicators in OSA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus from 2000 to 2025 were reviewed. A total of 1,793 articles were analyzed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, the R bibliometrix package, and Python. The analysis assessed publication and citation trends, country contributions, keyword co-occurrence, and thematic evolution to map global research patterns in OSA assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of publications increased steadily over time, reflecting growing research interest in multidimensional assessment approaches. Research themes have evolved from general inflammatory and metabolic markers toward more mechanistic and clinically oriented indicators, including oxidative stress pathways, circulating biomarkers, and cerebrovascular or cognitive related measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current research increasingly emphasizes integrated biological and clinical assessment frameworks for better characterization of OSA. Future studies should focus on validation, methodological standardization, and the integration of multiple assessment domains to facilitate clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9182,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17520363.2026.2671003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by diverse biological and clinical disturbances, yet no study has systematically examined scientific developments related to its objective assessment measures. This study aimed to map the development, research hotspots, and emerging trends related to biological and clinical assessment indicators in OSA.

Materials and methods: Publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus from 2000 to 2025 were reviewed. A total of 1,793 articles were analyzed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, the R bibliometrix package, and Python. The analysis assessed publication and citation trends, country contributions, keyword co-occurrence, and thematic evolution to map global research patterns in OSA assessment.

Results: The number of publications increased steadily over time, reflecting growing research interest in multidimensional assessment approaches. Research themes have evolved from general inflammatory and metabolic markers toward more mechanistic and clinically oriented indicators, including oxidative stress pathways, circulating biomarkers, and cerebrovascular or cognitive related measures.

Conclusions: Current research increasingly emphasizes integrated biological and clinical assessment frameworks for better characterization of OSA. Future studies should focus on validation, methodological standardization, and the integration of multiple assessment domains to facilitate clinical translation.

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停生物学和临床评估指标的科学趋势:文献计量学分析。
目的:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)以多种生物学和临床障碍为特征,但尚未有研究系统地检查与其客观评估措施相关的科学进展。本研究旨在梳理OSA生物学及临床评价指标的发展、研究热点及新趋势。材料与方法:检索Web of Science Core Collection和Scopus 2000 - 2025年收录的文献。使用VOSviewer、CiteSpace、R bibliometrix包和Python分析了总共1793篇文章。该分析评估了出版和引用趋势、国家贡献、关键词共现和专题演变,以绘制OSA评估中的全球研究模式。结果:随着时间的推移,出版物的数量稳步增加,反映了对多维评估方法的研究兴趣日益浓厚。研究主题已经从一般的炎症和代谢标志物演变为更机械和临床导向的指标,包括氧化应激途径,循环生物标志物,脑血管或认知相关措施。结论:目前的研究越来越强调综合生物学和临床评估框架,以更好地表征OSA。未来的研究应侧重于验证、方法标准化和多个评估领域的整合,以促进临床翻译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomarkers in medicine
Biomarkers in medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomarkers are physical, functional or biochemical indicators of physiological or disease processes. These key indicators can provide vital information in determining disease prognosis, in predicting of response to therapies, adverse events and drug interactions, and in establishing baseline risk. The explosion of interest in biomarker research is driving the development of new predictive, diagnostic and prognostic products in modern medical practice, and biomarkers are also playing an increasingly important role in the discovery and development of new drugs. For the full utility of biomarkers to be realized, we require greater understanding of disease mechanisms, and the interplay between disease mechanisms, therapeutic interventions and the proposed biomarkers. However, in attempting to evaluate the pros and cons of biomarkers systematically, we are moving into new, challenging territory. Biomarkers in Medicine (ISSN 1752-0363) is a peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal delivering commentary and analysis on the advances in our understanding of biomarkers and their potential and actual applications in medicine. The journal facilitates translation of our research knowledge into the clinic to increase the effectiveness of medical practice. As the scientific rationale and regulatory acceptance for biomarkers in medicine and in drug development become more fully established, Biomarkers in Medicine provides the platform for all players in this increasingly vital area to communicate and debate all issues relating to the potential utility and applications. Each issue includes a diversity of content to provide rounded coverage for the research professional. Articles include Guest Editorials, Interviews, Reviews, Research Articles, Perspectives, Priority Paper Evaluations, Special Reports, Case Reports, Conference Reports and Company Profiles. Review coverage is divided into themed sections according to area of therapeutic utility with some issues including themed sections on an area of topical interest. Biomarkers in Medicine provides a platform for commentary and debate for all professionals with an interest in the identification of biomarkers, elucidation of their role and formalization and approval of their application in modern medicine. The audience for Biomarkers in Medicine includes academic and industrial researchers, clinicians, pathologists, clinical chemists and regulatory professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书