[Doping in recreational sports].

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Pavel Dietz, Rolf Ulrich, Perikles Simon
{"title":"[Doping in recreational sports].","authors":"Pavel Dietz, Rolf Ulrich, Perikles Simon","doi":"10.1007/s00103-026-04245-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Doping is commonly perceived as being primarily associated with professional sports rather than recreational sports. This article is a discussion paper and addresses doping in recreational sports from conceptual, methodological, and empirical perspectives. Established doping definitions, particularly those of the World Anti-Doping Agency, are only partially transferable to recreational sports contexts due to their strong focus on organizational affiliation and competitive settings. For large segments of recreational sport, the concept of performance-enhancing substance use therefore provides a more appropriate description.Assessing the prevalence of such use is methodologically challenging due to the sensitive nature of the topic and the lack of control mechanisms. Indirect survey techniques reduce socially desirable responding and yield more realistic estimates. The unrelated question model (UQM) is a randomized response technique that ensures full anonymity and enables robust prevalence estimates of sensitive behaviors at the population level.Empirical findings using the UQM among recreational athletes in endurance, fitness, and bodybuilding contexts indicate that the use of performance-enhancing substances is not a marginal phenomenon. Prevalence estimates suggest a relevant and stable level over time. Strong associations are observed with non-therapeutic use of pain medication and an increasing medicalization of performance optimization. Evidence of access via healthcare structures highlights the structural embedding of this phenomenon. Overall, the use of performance-enhancing substances in recreational sport represents a socially and medically relevant field of action that requires differentiated prevention strategies and greater integration into medical education and training.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-026-04245-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Doping is commonly perceived as being primarily associated with professional sports rather than recreational sports. This article is a discussion paper and addresses doping in recreational sports from conceptual, methodological, and empirical perspectives. Established doping definitions, particularly those of the World Anti-Doping Agency, are only partially transferable to recreational sports contexts due to their strong focus on organizational affiliation and competitive settings. For large segments of recreational sport, the concept of performance-enhancing substance use therefore provides a more appropriate description.Assessing the prevalence of such use is methodologically challenging due to the sensitive nature of the topic and the lack of control mechanisms. Indirect survey techniques reduce socially desirable responding and yield more realistic estimates. The unrelated question model (UQM) is a randomized response technique that ensures full anonymity and enables robust prevalence estimates of sensitive behaviors at the population level.Empirical findings using the UQM among recreational athletes in endurance, fitness, and bodybuilding contexts indicate that the use of performance-enhancing substances is not a marginal phenomenon. Prevalence estimates suggest a relevant and stable level over time. Strong associations are observed with non-therapeutic use of pain medication and an increasing medicalization of performance optimization. Evidence of access via healthcare structures highlights the structural embedding of this phenomenon. Overall, the use of performance-enhancing substances in recreational sport represents a socially and medically relevant field of action that requires differentiated prevention strategies and greater integration into medical education and training.

[在休闲运动中使用兴奋剂]。
兴奋剂通常被认为主要与职业运动有关,而不是娱乐运动。这篇文章是一篇讨论论文,从概念、方法和经验的角度阐述了休闲体育运动中的兴奋剂问题。既定的兴奋剂定义,特别是世界反兴奋剂机构的定义,由于其强烈关注组织关系和竞争环境,只能部分地转移到娱乐体育环境中。因此,对于休闲运动的大部分,使用提高成绩的物质的概念提供了一个更合适的描述。由于该专题的敏感性和缺乏控制机制,评估这种使用的普遍程度在方法上具有挑战性。间接调查技术减少了社会期望的回应,产生了更现实的估计。不相关问题模型(UQM)是一种随机响应技术,它确保了完全匿名性,并能够在人群水平上对敏感行为进行稳健的患病率估计。在耐力、健身和健美背景下使用UQM的休闲运动员的实证研究结果表明,使用提高成绩的物质并不是一个边缘现象。流行率估计表明,随着时间的推移,其水平是相关和稳定的。强关联观察到非治疗性使用止痛药和性能优化的日益医学化。通过卫生保健机构获取的证据突出了这一现象的结构性嵌入。总体而言,在娱乐运动中使用提高成绩的物质是一个与社会和医学相关的行动领域,需要有区别的预防战略,并进一步纳入医学教育和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书