Four key things to know about the reliability of measurements.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Timothy P Hofer
{"title":"Four key things to know about the reliability of measurements.","authors":"Timothy P Hofer","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reliability is the most reported measurement characteristic used as evidence of the quality of a measurement. However, researchers often miss opportunities to design studies in a way that allows reliability to be calculated and report a calculation that is not germane to the purpose of the measurement.Reliability is a number that quantifies the ability of a measurement to distinguish between the members of a population with respect to a measured quantity. It is a simple function of the signal and noise in a measurement. In this paper, I review four key attributes. First, reliability has a single technical definition, but there are many statistics that purport to quantify reliability that do not fit this definition or obscure their relationship to it. This undermines the fundamental simplicity of the concept and its useful implications. Second, researchers sometimes do not appreciate that the relevant calculation of reliability changes with the purpose and conditions of measurement and then report the wrong number. Third, reliability is a summary measure with several components that may be as or more relevant to report than reliability. Fourth, reliability is specific to a population, for example, a patient satisfaction score that is highly reliable in one population could have abysmal reliability in a different population when using the same survey instrument.Reliability is an important part of evaluating and improving the measurements that form the foundations of scientific research in healthcare quality and safety. Understanding these four key attributes of reliability will improve the description and use of healthcare quality and safety measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018924","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliability is the most reported measurement characteristic used as evidence of the quality of a measurement. However, researchers often miss opportunities to design studies in a way that allows reliability to be calculated and report a calculation that is not germane to the purpose of the measurement.Reliability is a number that quantifies the ability of a measurement to distinguish between the members of a population with respect to a measured quantity. It is a simple function of the signal and noise in a measurement. In this paper, I review four key attributes. First, reliability has a single technical definition, but there are many statistics that purport to quantify reliability that do not fit this definition or obscure their relationship to it. This undermines the fundamental simplicity of the concept and its useful implications. Second, researchers sometimes do not appreciate that the relevant calculation of reliability changes with the purpose and conditions of measurement and then report the wrong number. Third, reliability is a summary measure with several components that may be as or more relevant to report than reliability. Fourth, reliability is specific to a population, for example, a patient satisfaction score that is highly reliable in one population could have abysmal reliability in a different population when using the same survey instrument.Reliability is an important part of evaluating and improving the measurements that form the foundations of scientific research in healthcare quality and safety. Understanding these four key attributes of reliability will improve the description and use of healthcare quality and safety measurements.

关于测量的可靠性,需要知道四个关键的事情。
可靠性是被报道最多的测量特性,用来作为测量质量的证据。然而,研究人员经常错过设计研究的机会,这种方法允许计算可靠性,并报告与测量目的无关的计算。可靠性是一个数字,它量化了测量在相对于测量量的总体成员之间区分的能力。它是测量中信号和噪声的简单函数。在本文中,我回顾了四个关键属性。首先,可靠性有一个单一的技术定义,但是有许多旨在量化可靠性的统计数据并不符合这个定义,或者模糊了它们与可靠性的关系。这破坏了这个概念的基本简单性及其有用的含义。其次,研究人员有时没有意识到相关的可靠性计算随着测量目的和条件的变化而变化,从而报告了错误的数字。第三,可靠性是一个总结性的度量,它包含了几个与报告的可靠性同样或更相关的组成部分。第四,可靠性是特定于人群的,例如,当使用相同的调查工具时,在一个人群中高度可靠的患者满意度评分在另一个人群中可能具有糟糕的可靠性。可靠性是评估和改进测量的重要组成部分,这些测量构成了医疗质量和安全科学研究的基础。了解可靠性的这四个关键属性将改进医疗保健质量和安全度量的描述和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书