Development of a patient decision aid prototype on the decision to continue, reduce or discontinue antipsychotic medication following remission of first-episode psychosis.
Laurent Béchard, Olivier Corbeil, Maxime Huot-Lavoie, Olivier Roy, Sébastien Brodeur, Emmanuelle Bouchard, Joanne Martel, Natalie Pavey, Amélie M Achim, Matthew Menear, Marc-André Roy, Sophie Lauzier, Marie-France Demers
{"title":"Development of a patient decision aid prototype on the decision to continue, reduce or discontinue antipsychotic medication following remission of first-episode psychosis.","authors":"Laurent Béchard, Olivier Corbeil, Maxime Huot-Lavoie, Olivier Roy, Sébastien Brodeur, Emmanuelle Bouchard, Joanne Martel, Natalie Pavey, Amélie M Achim, Matthew Menear, Marc-André Roy, Sophie Lauzier, Marie-France Demers","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2026.11034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared decision-making is essential to patient-centred care, but remains underutilised in psychiatry, particularly when deciding whether to continue, reduce or stop antipsychotic medication after remission from first-episode psychosis (FEP). Existing decision aids do not fully address recovery goals such as autonomy, identity and social reintegration.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To co-develop a patient decision aid (PDA) prototype that supports individuals in making the decision to continue, reduce or stop antipsychotics following remission from FEP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used a patient-centred design process informed by International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS), User Centered Design (UCD-11) and the CHIME framework. A multidisciplinary steering group - including individuals with lived experience, clinicians, and researchers - co-developed the PDA. Iterative feedback was collected from an external advisory group of patient partners, caregivers and healthcare providers (<i>n</i> = 7). Acceptability was evaluated with structured questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final prototype, structured into five sections (decision overview, personal values, risks and benefits, planning and real-life experiences), demonstrated strong acceptability across stakeholders. Ratings improved with each iteration, with version 3 receiving near-perfect scores on clarity, usefulness and balance. Users described the tool as relatable and empowering. The inclusion of real-life stories and visual decision exercises were particularly valued. However, some clinicians expressed concerns about time constraints and workflow integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This recovery-oriented PDA prototype offers a practical, evidence-based resource to facilitate shared decision-making with respect to continuing, reducing or stopping antipsychotics after FEP. Although early feedback is promising, pilot testing is needed to evaluate its impact on decision quality, satisfaction and treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"12 3","pages":"e125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13150719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.11034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Shared decision-making is essential to patient-centred care, but remains underutilised in psychiatry, particularly when deciding whether to continue, reduce or stop antipsychotic medication after remission from first-episode psychosis (FEP). Existing decision aids do not fully address recovery goals such as autonomy, identity and social reintegration.
Aims: To co-develop a patient decision aid (PDA) prototype that supports individuals in making the decision to continue, reduce or stop antipsychotics following remission from FEP.
Method: We used a patient-centred design process informed by International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS), User Centered Design (UCD-11) and the CHIME framework. A multidisciplinary steering group - including individuals with lived experience, clinicians, and researchers - co-developed the PDA. Iterative feedback was collected from an external advisory group of patient partners, caregivers and healthcare providers (n = 7). Acceptability was evaluated with structured questionnaires.
Results: The final prototype, structured into five sections (decision overview, personal values, risks and benefits, planning and real-life experiences), demonstrated strong acceptability across stakeholders. Ratings improved with each iteration, with version 3 receiving near-perfect scores on clarity, usefulness and balance. Users described the tool as relatable and empowering. The inclusion of real-life stories and visual decision exercises were particularly valued. However, some clinicians expressed concerns about time constraints and workflow integration.
Conclusions: This recovery-oriented PDA prototype offers a practical, evidence-based resource to facilitate shared decision-making with respect to continuing, reducing or stopping antipsychotics after FEP. Although early feedback is promising, pilot testing is needed to evaluate its impact on decision quality, satisfaction and treatment outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.