Development of a patient decision aid prototype on the decision to continue, reduce or discontinue antipsychotic medication following remission of first-episode psychosis.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Laurent Béchard, Olivier Corbeil, Maxime Huot-Lavoie, Olivier Roy, Sébastien Brodeur, Emmanuelle Bouchard, Joanne Martel, Natalie Pavey, Amélie M Achim, Matthew Menear, Marc-André Roy, Sophie Lauzier, Marie-France Demers
{"title":"Development of a patient decision aid prototype on the decision to continue, reduce or discontinue antipsychotic medication following remission of first-episode psychosis.","authors":"Laurent Béchard, Olivier Corbeil, Maxime Huot-Lavoie, Olivier Roy, Sébastien Brodeur, Emmanuelle Bouchard, Joanne Martel, Natalie Pavey, Amélie M Achim, Matthew Menear, Marc-André Roy, Sophie Lauzier, Marie-France Demers","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2026.11034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared decision-making is essential to patient-centred care, but remains underutilised in psychiatry, particularly when deciding whether to continue, reduce or stop antipsychotic medication after remission from first-episode psychosis (FEP). Existing decision aids do not fully address recovery goals such as autonomy, identity and social reintegration.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To co-develop a patient decision aid (PDA) prototype that supports individuals in making the decision to continue, reduce or stop antipsychotics following remission from FEP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used a patient-centred design process informed by International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS), User Centered Design (UCD-11) and the CHIME framework. A multidisciplinary steering group - including individuals with lived experience, clinicians, and researchers - co-developed the PDA. Iterative feedback was collected from an external advisory group of patient partners, caregivers and healthcare providers (<i>n</i> = 7). Acceptability was evaluated with structured questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final prototype, structured into five sections (decision overview, personal values, risks and benefits, planning and real-life experiences), demonstrated strong acceptability across stakeholders. Ratings improved with each iteration, with version 3 receiving near-perfect scores on clarity, usefulness and balance. Users described the tool as relatable and empowering. The inclusion of real-life stories and visual decision exercises were particularly valued. However, some clinicians expressed concerns about time constraints and workflow integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This recovery-oriented PDA prototype offers a practical, evidence-based resource to facilitate shared decision-making with respect to continuing, reducing or stopping antipsychotics after FEP. Although early feedback is promising, pilot testing is needed to evaluate its impact on decision quality, satisfaction and treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"12 3","pages":"e125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13150719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.11034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making is essential to patient-centred care, but remains underutilised in psychiatry, particularly when deciding whether to continue, reduce or stop antipsychotic medication after remission from first-episode psychosis (FEP). Existing decision aids do not fully address recovery goals such as autonomy, identity and social reintegration.

Aims: To co-develop a patient decision aid (PDA) prototype that supports individuals in making the decision to continue, reduce or stop antipsychotics following remission from FEP.

Method: We used a patient-centred design process informed by International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS), User Centered Design (UCD-11) and the CHIME framework. A multidisciplinary steering group - including individuals with lived experience, clinicians, and researchers - co-developed the PDA. Iterative feedback was collected from an external advisory group of patient partners, caregivers and healthcare providers (n = 7). Acceptability was evaluated with structured questionnaires.

Results: The final prototype, structured into five sections (decision overview, personal values, risks and benefits, planning and real-life experiences), demonstrated strong acceptability across stakeholders. Ratings improved with each iteration, with version 3 receiving near-perfect scores on clarity, usefulness and balance. Users described the tool as relatable and empowering. The inclusion of real-life stories and visual decision exercises were particularly valued. However, some clinicians expressed concerns about time constraints and workflow integration.

Conclusions: This recovery-oriented PDA prototype offers a practical, evidence-based resource to facilitate shared decision-making with respect to continuing, reducing or stopping antipsychotics after FEP. Although early feedback is promising, pilot testing is needed to evaluate its impact on decision quality, satisfaction and treatment outcomes.

开发患者决策辅助原型,帮助患者在首发精神病缓解后决定继续、减少或停止抗精神病药物治疗。
背景:共同决策对于以患者为中心的护理至关重要,但在精神病学中仍未得到充分利用,特别是在决定是否继续,减少或停止首次发作精神病(FEP)缓解后的抗精神病药物。现有的决策辅助工具不能完全解决自主、身份和重新融入社会等恢复目标。目的:共同开发患者决策辅助(PDA)原型,支持个体在FEP缓解后决定继续、减少或停止抗精神病药物。方法:我们采用以患者为中心的设计过程,采用国际患者决策辅助标准(IPDAS)、以用户为中心的设计(UCD-11)和CHIME框架。一个多学科指导小组——包括有生活经验的个人、临床医生和研究人员——共同开发了PDA。从由患者伴侣、护理人员和医疗保健提供者组成的外部咨询小组(n = 7)收集迭代反馈。可接受性通过结构化问卷进行评估。结果:最终的原型分为五个部分(决策概述、个人价值观、风险和利益、计划和现实生活经验),在利益相关者中表现出很强的可接受性。评分在每次迭代中都有所提高,版本3在清晰度、实用性和平衡性方面获得了近乎完美的分数。用户将该工具描述为具有相关性和授权。其中包含真实故事和视觉决策练习尤为重要。然而,一些临床医生表达了对时间限制和工作流程集成的担忧。结论:这种以恢复为导向的PDA原型提供了一种实用的、基于证据的资源,以促进在FEP后继续、减少或停止抗精神病药物的共同决策。虽然早期反馈很有希望,但需要进行试点测试,以评估其对决策质量、满意度和治疗结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书