Pediatric lung ground glass nodules: a real-world, large-scale CT cohort analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ya-Ni Duan, Yue-Fei Guo, Jun-Zhe Wen, Xue Lin, Yan-Qiu Zhu, Jie Qin
{"title":"Pediatric lung ground glass nodules: a real-world, large-scale CT cohort analysis.","authors":"Ya-Ni Duan, Yue-Fei Guo, Jun-Zhe Wen, Xue Lin, Yan-Qiu Zhu, Jie Qin","doi":"10.1186/s12880-026-02405-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing detection of pediatric ground-glass nodules (GGNs) presents a clinical dilemma lacking robust evidence and guidelines. We aimed to evaluate the short-term natural course of incidental pediatric GGNs through real-world observation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center, real-world study screened children (0-18 years) undergoing low-dose chest CT between January 1, 2010, and December 15, 2025. Patients with GGNs were included, excluding those with malignancy, immune dysfunction, specific infections, mean diameter < 3 mm or > 30 mm, artificial intelligence recognition failure, or poor image quality. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and CT imaging features were collected and analyzed, with subgroup analyses performed. For patients with follow-up CT, nodule evolution was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14,106 children, 901 (6.4%) had GGNs. After exclusions, 602 patients were included, with a median age of 15 (14, 17) years, 58.6% were male. From these patients, 602 most suspicious GGNs were analyzed, comprising 43 (7.1%) mixed GGNs and 559 (92.9%) pure GGNs. Mixed GGNs showed significantly larger size and higher attenuation than pure GGNs (P < 0.01). Children aged > 12 years had GGNs with larger volume and lower attenuation compared to younger children (P < 0.05). Among the follow-up subgroup (n = 78), with a median follow-up period of 268.5 days, 32 GGNs regressed, 45 remained stable, and only 1 increased in size (pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma in situ). Smaller GGNs at baseline were more likely to regress (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GGNs are not uncommon in children on chest CT. In our cohort, most GGNs remained stable or regressed over short-term follow-up. These observations suggest a relatively indolent short-term natural course and may support a conservative management strategy for incidentally detected GGNs in children. Given the limited follow-up duration, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further studies with longer follow-up durations and larger sample sizes are warranted to elucidate the long-term natural course of pediatric GGNs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02405-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing detection of pediatric ground-glass nodules (GGNs) presents a clinical dilemma lacking robust evidence and guidelines. We aimed to evaluate the short-term natural course of incidental pediatric GGNs through real-world observation.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center, real-world study screened children (0-18 years) undergoing low-dose chest CT between January 1, 2010, and December 15, 2025. Patients with GGNs were included, excluding those with malignancy, immune dysfunction, specific infections, mean diameter < 3 mm or > 30 mm, artificial intelligence recognition failure, or poor image quality. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and CT imaging features were collected and analyzed, with subgroup analyses performed. For patients with follow-up CT, nodule evolution was assessed.

Results: Among 14,106 children, 901 (6.4%) had GGNs. After exclusions, 602 patients were included, with a median age of 15 (14, 17) years, 58.6% were male. From these patients, 602 most suspicious GGNs were analyzed, comprising 43 (7.1%) mixed GGNs and 559 (92.9%) pure GGNs. Mixed GGNs showed significantly larger size and higher attenuation than pure GGNs (P < 0.01). Children aged > 12 years had GGNs with larger volume and lower attenuation compared to younger children (P < 0.05). Among the follow-up subgroup (n = 78), with a median follow-up period of 268.5 days, 32 GGNs regressed, 45 remained stable, and only 1 increased in size (pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma in situ). Smaller GGNs at baseline were more likely to regress (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: GGNs are not uncommon in children on chest CT. In our cohort, most GGNs remained stable or regressed over short-term follow-up. These observations suggest a relatively indolent short-term natural course and may support a conservative management strategy for incidentally detected GGNs in children. Given the limited follow-up duration, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further studies with longer follow-up durations and larger sample sizes are warranted to elucidate the long-term natural course of pediatric GGNs.

儿童肺磨砂玻璃结节:真实世界的大规模CT队列分析。
背景:儿童磨玻璃结节(ggn)的检测越来越多,这是一个缺乏有力证据和指南的临床困境。我们的目的是通过现实世界的观察来评估偶然发生的小儿ggn的短期自然过程。方法:这项回顾性、单中心、真实世界研究筛选了2010年1月1日至2025年12月15日期间接受低剂量胸部CT检查的儿童(0-18岁)。纳入ggn患者,排除恶性肿瘤、免疫功能障碍、特异性感染、平均直径30 mm、人工智能识别失败或图像质量差的患者。收集和分析基线特征、临床表现和CT成像特征,并进行亚组分析。对于随访CT的患者,评估结节的演变。结果:14106例患儿中有901例(6.4%)发生ggn。排除后,纳入602例患者,中位年龄15(14,17)岁,58.6%为男性。在这些患者中,分析了602例最可疑的ggn,其中混合ggn 43例(7.1%),纯ggn 559例(92.9%)。与单纯ggn相比,混合ggn的体积更大,衰减更高(P 12岁儿童的ggn体积更大,衰减更低)。结论:儿童胸部CT上ggn并不罕见。在我们的队列中,大多数ggn在短期随访中保持稳定或退化。这些观察结果表明,对于偶然发现的儿童ggn,短期自然病程相对缓慢,可能支持保守的管理策略。鉴于随访时间有限,这些发现应谨慎解释。进一步的研究需要更长的随访时间和更大的样本量来阐明儿童ggn的长期自然过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书